Access to a Responsiveness to Intervention Model

In this study, we tested the outcomes of access to a response to intervention (RtI) model in kindergarten or in first grade on end-of-Grade-2 reading achievement and placement in special education. Across five schools, 214 students who began having access to Tier 2 intervention in kindergarten or first grade were compared in Grades 1 and 2 with 208 cohort peers who were average readers and 102 historical control condition second grade poor readers who did not receive Tier 2 intervention. Results demonstrated significant effects on reading achievement for access to RtI in kindergarten at the end of first grade (effects averaged 0.48), but not in second grade, except for students who were English language learners (ELLs), who showed an advantage through the end of second grade. Students with access to RtI overall had significantly higher outcomes at the end of Grade 2 than students in the historical control, with no differences resulting from ELL status. No significant difference in the proportion of students placed in special education was noted; however, a greater proportion of the students found eligible as with learning disabilities had poor reading scores if they were placed after participating in RtI.

[1]  Benita A. Blachman,et al.  Effect of Phoneme Awareness Instruction on Kindergarten Children's Invented Spelling , 1992 .

[2]  Edward R. Sipay,et al.  Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers : Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific Reading disability , 1996 .

[3]  Alfredo J. Artiles,et al.  English Language Learners Who Struggle With Reading , 2006, Journal of learning disabilities.

[4]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Responding to Nonresponders: An Experimental Field Trial of Identification and Intervention Methods , 2005 .

[5]  Paul Muyskens,et al.  Problem‐Solving Model for Decision Making with High‐Incidence Disabilities: The Minneapolis Experience , 2003 .

[6]  D. Speece.  Hitting the Moving Target Known as Reading Development , 2005, Journal of learning disabilities.

[7]  English Language Learners Who Struggle with Reading: Language Acquisition or Learning Disabilities? , 2006 .

[8]  Jack M. Fletcher,et al.  Dimensions Affecting the Assessment of Reading Comprehension , 2005 .

[9]  L. Fuchs.  Assessing Intervention Responsiveness: Conceptual and Technical Issues , 2003 .

[10]  Deborah C. Simmons,et al.  Indexing Response to Intervention , 2008, Journal of learning disabilities.

[11]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Response to Instruction as a Means of Identifying Students with Reading/Learning Disabilities , 2003 .

[12]  Rollanda E. O'Connor.  Increasing the Intensity of Intervention in Kindergarten and First Grade , 2000 .

[13]  Amy C. Crosson,et al.  Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of fluent reading to comprehension: Spanish-speakers’ text-reading fluency in English , 2010 .

[14]  Esther Geva,et al.  The development of vocabulary in English as a second language children and its role in predicting word recognition ability , 2009 .

[15]  Daryl F. Mellard,et al.  Response to Intervention Screening and Progress-Monitoring Practices in 41 Local Schools , 2009 .

[16]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Monitoring Early Reading Development in First Grade: Word Identification Fluency versus Nonsense Word Fluency , 2004 .

[17]  Anne E. Cunningham,et al.  Explicit versus Implicit Instruction in Phonemic Awareness. , 1990 .

[18]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Is Reading Important in Reading-Readiness Programs? A Randomized Field Trial with Teachers as Program Implementers. , 2001 .

[19]  Jay R. Campbell,et al.  The Nation's Report Card: Reading, 2002. , 2003 .

[20]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  Ladders to Literacy: The Effects of Teacher-Led Phonological Activities for Kindergarten Children with and without Disabilities , 1996 .

[21]  S. Vaughn,et al.  The Response to Intervention of English Language Learners at Risk for Reading Problems , 2006, Journal of learning disabilities.

[22]  D. Oswald,et al.  Cultural Sensitivity in the Application of Behavior Principles to Education , 2008 .

[23]  Nonie K. Lesaux,et al.  The gap between Spanish speakers' word reading and word knowledge: a longitudinal study. , 2011, Child development.

[24]  Darlene M. Tangel,et al.  Developing phonological awareness and word recognition skills: A two-year intervention with low-income, inner-city children , 1999 .

[25]  Joseph C. Witt,et al.  A Multi-Year Evaluation of the Effects of a Response to Intervention (RTI) Model on Identification of Children for Special Education. , 2007 .

[26]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[27]  John O. Willis,et al.  Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Third Edition , 2008 .

[28]  T. Conway,et al.  Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. , 1999 .

[29]  C. Schatschneider,et al.  Identification of Reading Problems in First Grade Within a Response-to-Intervention Framework , 2011, The Elementary School Journal.

[30]  D. Fuchs,et al.  Implementing Research–Based Instruction to Prevent Reading Problems among Low–Income Students: Is Earlier Better? , 2010 .

[31]  M. Suzanne Donovan,et al.  Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. , 2002 .

[32]  Deborah C. Simmons,et al.  Beginning Reading Intervention as Inoculation or Insulin , 2004, Journal of learning disabilities.

[33]  Ruth A. Kaminski,et al.  Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. , 1996 .

[34]  John M. Hintze,et al.  Concurrent Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills and the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing , 2003 .

[35]  Elaine Bukowiecki,et al.  Teaching Children How to Read , 2007 .

[36]  J. Keenan,et al.  Reading Comprehension Tests Vary in the Skills They Assess: Differential Dependence on Decoding and Oral Comprehension , 2008 .

[37]  Michael J. Kieffer.  Socioeconomic Status, English Proficiency, and Late-Emerging Reading Difficulties , 2010 .

[38]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  The Effectiveness of One-to-One Tutoring by Community Tutors for at-Risk Beginning Readers , 1997 .

[39]  Terri L. Kurz,et al.  Effectiveness of a Supplemental Early Reading Intervention Scaled up in Multiple Schools , 2010 .

[40]  Janice M. Keenan,et al.  Comprehending the Gray Oral Reading Test Without Reading It: Why Comprehension Tests Should Not Include Passage-Independent Items , 2006 .

[41]  Patricia F. Vadasy,et al.  Effectiveness of Paraeducator-Supplemented Individual Instruction , 2007, Journal of learning disabilities.

[42]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Is a Three-Tier Reading Intervention Model Associated With Reduced Placement in Special Education? , 2011 .

[43]  J Bruce Tomblin,et al.  Prevalence and Nature of Late-Emerging Poor Readers. , 2012, Journal of educational psychology.

[44]  J. Torgesen,et al.  The Effectiveness of a Group Reading Instruction Program with Poor Readers in Multiple Grades , 2001 .

[45]  Christy S. Murray,et al.  Response to Early Reading Intervention Examining Higher and Lower Responders , 2009 .

[46]  Maureen W. Lovett,et al.  The Effectiveness of Remedial Programs for Reading Disabled Children of Different Ages: Does the Benefit Decrease for Older Children? , 1997 .

[47]  Nonie K. Lesaux,et al.  Predictors of Reading Comprehension for Struggling Readers: The Case of Spanish-speaking Language Minority Learners. , 2010, Journal of educational psychology.

[48]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  Responsiveness of Students With Language Difficulties to Early Intervention in Reading , 2010 .

[49]  K. Stanovich.  Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. , 1986 .

[50]  Laura A. Barquero,et al.  Selecting At-Risk First-Grade Readers for Early Intervention: Eliminating False Positives and Exploring the Promise of a Two-Stage Gated Screening Process. , 2010, Journal of educational psychology.

[51]  Frederick J. Morrison,et al.  A Second Chance in Second Grade: The Independent and Cumulative Impact of First- and Second-Grade Reading Instruction and Students' Letter-Word Reading Skill Growth , 2007 .

[52]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  Prediction of Reading Disabilities in Kindergarten and First Grade , 1999 .

[53]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Smart RTI: A Next-Generation Approach to Multilevel Prevention , 2012, Exceptional children.

[54]  Caroline Y. Walker,et al.  Identifying Children in Middle Childhood Who Are at Risk for Reading Problems , 2010, School psychology review.

[55]  Alicia Sandman,et al.  Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills , 2010 .

[56]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[57]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  EARLY IDENTIFICATION AND INTERVENTION FOR YOUNG CHILDREN WITH READING / LEARNING DISABILITIES , 2002 .

[58]  Virginia W. Berninger,et al.  Phonological Awareness and Beginning Reading in Spanish-Speaking ESL First Graders: Research into Practice , 2002 .

[59]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  Layers of Reading Intervention in Kindergarten Through Third Grade , 2005, Journal of learning disabilities.

[60]  C. Schatschneider,et al.  Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties , 2008 .

[61]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. , 1987 .

[62]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  Transfer among Phonological Tasks in Kindergarten: Essential Instructional Content. , 1995 .

[63]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  Teaching reading to poor readers in the intermediate grades: A comparison of text difficulty , 2002 .