Epistasis can facilitate the evolution of reproductive isolation by peak shifts: a two-locus two-allele model.

The influence of epistasis on the evolution of reproductive isolation by peak shifts is studied in a two-locus two-allele model of a quantitative genetic character under stabilizing selection. Epistasis is introduced by a simple multiplicative term in the function that maps gene effects onto genotypic values. In the model with only additive effects on the trait, the probability of a peak shift and the amount of reproductive isolation are always inversely related, i.e., the higher the peak shift rate, the lower the amount of reproductive isolation caused by the peak shift. With epistatic characters there is no consistent relationship between these two values. Interestingly, there are cases where both transition rates as well as the amount of reproductive isolation are increased relative to the additive model. This effect has two main causes: a shift in the location of the transition point, and the hybrids between the two alternative optimal genotypes have lower average fitness in the epistatic case. A review of the empirical literature shows that the fitness relations resulting in higher peak shift rates and more reproductive isolation are qualitatively the same as those observed for genes causing hybrid inferiority.

[1]  Reinhard Bu¨rger,et al.  Mutation-selection balance and continuum-of-alleles models , 1988 .

[2]  T. Dobzhansky.  Genetics of the Evolutionary Process , 1970 .

[3]  H. A. Orr,et al.  GENETICS OF STERILITY IN HYBRIDS BETWEEN TWO SUBSPECIES OF DROSOPHILA , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  H. Oka.  Analysis of genes controlling f(1) sterility in rice by the use of isogenic lines. , 1974, Genetics.

[5]  N. Barton.  The effects of linkage and density-dependent regulation on gene flow , 1986, Heredity.

[6]  A. Templeton,et al.  The molecular through ecological genetics of abnormal abdomen in Drosophila mercatorum. I. Basic genetics. , 1985, Genetics.

[7]  R. Bürger.  On the evolution of dominance modifiers I. A nonlinear analysis. , 1983, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  P. Foley.  Molecular clock rates at loci under stabilizing selection. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  A. Templeton,et al.  Genetic Revolutions in Relation to Speciation Phenomena: The Founding of New Populations , 1984 .

[10]  A. Gimelfarb.  Genotypic variation for a quantitative character maintained under stabilizing selection without mutations: epistasis. , 1989, Genetics.

[11]  A. Templeton.  Genetic architectures of speciation. , 1982, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[12]  W. Ewens.  Mathematical Population Genetics , 1980 .

[13]  J. Endler.  Natural selection in the wild , 1987 .

[14]  R. Lande.  Expected time for random genetic drift of a population between stable phenotypic states. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  M. Macnair,et al.  Reproductive isolation as a pleiotropic effect of copper tolerance in Mimulus guttatus? , 1983, Heredity.

[16]  W F Bodmer,et al.  Linkage and selection: theoretical analysis of the deterministic two locus random mating model. , 1967, Genetics.

[17]  N. Barton,et al.  The frequency of shifts between alternative equilibria. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Genetic Revolutions, Founder Effects, and Speciation , 1984 .

[19]  E. Mayr.  Systematics and the Origin of Species , 1942 .

[20]  S Karlin,et al.  Linkage and selection: two locus symmetric viability model. , 1970, Theoretical population biology.

[21]  R. Bürger.  Linkage and the maintenance of heritable variation by mutation-selection balance. , 1989, Genetics.

[22]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Selection in populations with overlapping generations. I. The use of Malthusian parameters in population genetics. , 1970, Theoretical population biology.

[23]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  The theory of evolution and dynamical systems , 1988 .

[24]  M. Schartl,et al.  Xiphophorus as an in vivo model for studies on normal and defective control of oncogenes. , 1984, Advances in cancer research.

[25]  M. Macnair,et al.  Complementary lethal factors in two North American populations of the yellow monkey flower , 1984 .

[26]  M. Kimura,et al.  An introduction to population genetics theory , 1971 .

[27]  H. A. Orr,et al.  Genetics of male and female sterility in hybrids of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. , 1987, Genetics.

[28]  M. Gordon,et al.  The Genetics of a Viviparous Top-Minnow Platypoecilus; the Inheritance of Two Kinds of Melanophores. , 1927, Genetics.

[29]  M. Schartl,et al.  Novel putative receptor tyrosine kinase encoded by the melanoma-inducing Tu locus in Xiphophorus , 1989, Nature.

[30]  H. A. Orr,et al.  PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  THE PROBABILITY OF PEAK SHIFTS IN A FOUNDER POPULATION. II. AN ADDITIVE POLYGENIC TRAIT , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  S. Wright.  The genetics of quantitative variability. , 1952 .

[33]  R. DeSalle,et al.  Drosophila Molecular Phylogenies and Their Uses , 1995 .

[34]  R. Bürger.  Dynamics of the classical genetic model for the evolution of dominance , 1983 .

[35]  N. Barton,et al.  The divergence of a polygenic system subject to stabilizing selection, mutation and drift. , 1989, Genetical research.