Explicating the design of overhead absorption procedures in UK organizations

This paper reports the findings of a postal questionnaire survey that examines the extent to which potential explanatory factors influence the level of complexity of product costing system design choices in UK companies. It is argued that because previous surveys have sought to classify costing systems by two discrete alternatives, either traditional or ABC systems, they do not adequately capture the diversity of practices that exist. The distinguishing feature of this paper is that it adopts a broader perspective and examines cost system design choices that vary along a continuum ranging from very simplistic to highly complex costing systems.

[1]  Maurice Gosselin.  The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing , 1997 .

[2]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[3]  Mike Tayles,et al.  Product costing in UK manufacturing organizations , 1994 .

[4]  Marinus J. Bouwman,et al.  The Association between Activity-Based Costing and Improvement in Financial Performance , 2002 .

[5]  Thomas H. Johnson,et al.  Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting , 1987 .

[6]  Falconer Mitchell,et al.  Activity-based costing in the U.K.’s largest companies: a comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey results , 2000 .

[7]  M. Aiken,et al.  The Organic Organization and Innovation , 1971 .

[8]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Size and Innovation , 1992 .

[9]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS 13.0 Guide to Data Analysis , 2000 .

[10]  Lisa Ann McManus,et al.  The incidence, perceived merit and antecedents of customer accounting: an exploratory note , 2002 .

[11]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[12]  Falconer Mitchell,et al.  The process of change in management accounting: some field study evidence , 1990 .

[13]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  Stock market reactions to activity-based costing adoptions , 1999 .

[14]  Markus Granlund,et al.  The fragmented communication structure within the accounting academia: the case of activity-based costing research genres , 2002 .

[15]  Andrew L. Friedman,et al.  Activity-Based Techniques: The Real Life Consequences , 1996 .

[16]  David Dugdale,et al.  How many companies use ABC for stock valuation? A comment on Innes and Mitchell's questionnaire findings , 1997 .

[17]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[18]  C. Perrow.  Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View , 1970 .

[19]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Activity-based Systems: Measuring the Costs of Resource Usage , 1992 .

[20]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[21]  Falconer Mitchell,et al.  A survey of activity-based costing in the U.K.'s largest companies , 1995 .

[22]  Michael D. Shields.  Research in management accounting by North Americans in the 1990s , 1997 .

[23]  Teemu Malmi,et al.  Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms , 1999 .

[24]  Zahirul Hoque,et al.  JUST-IN-TIME PRODUCTION, AUTOMATION, COST ALLOCATION PRACTICES AND IMPORTANCE OF COST INFORMATION: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION IN NEW ZEALAND-BASED MANUFACTURING ORGANIZATIONS , 2000 .

[25]  R. Chenhall.  Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future , 2003 .

[26]  Colin Drury,et al.  Research into product costing practice: a European perspective , 2001 .

[27]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Cost & Effect: Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance , 1997 .

[28]  Christopher John Guilding,et al.  Competitor-focused accounting: an exploratory note , 1999 .

[29]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[30]  William J. Bruns,et al.  Accounting and Management: Field Study Perspectives , 1987 .

[31]  Zahirul Hoque,et al.  Linking Balanced Scorecard Measures to Size and Market Factors: Impact on Organizational Performance , 2000 .

[32]  Eric W. Noreen,et al.  Conditions Under Which Activity-Based Cost Systems Provide Relevant Costs , 2005 .

[33]  Trond Bjørnenak.  Diffusion and accounting: the case of ABC in Norway , 1997 .

[34]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL AND COMPETITIVE BANDWAGONS: USING MATHEMATICAL MODELING AS A TOOL TO EXPLORE INNOVATION DIFFUSION , 1993 .

[35]  Judith R. Blau,et al.  Ideas, Complexity, and Innovation. , 1979 .

[36]  George Foster,et al.  Measuring the success of activity-based cost management and its determinants , 1997 .

[37]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[38]  Srikant M. Datar,et al.  Aggregation, Specification and Measurement Errors in Product Costing , 1994 .

[39]  Teemu Malmi,et al.  Towards explaining activity-based costing failure: accounting and control in a decentralized organization , 1997 .

[40]  Michael W. Maher,et al.  A field study on the limitations of activity-based costing when resources are provided on a joint and indivisible basis , 1998 .

[41]  W. Nord,et al.  Implementing Routine and Radical Inno-vation , 1986 .

[42]  Joan C. Woodward.  Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice , 1966 .

[43]  Kip R. Krumwiede.  The Implementation Steps of Activity-Based Costing and the Impact of Contextual and Organizational Factors , 1998 .

[44]  J. Bright,et al.  The deployment of costing techniques and practices: a UK study , 1992 .

[45]  Robert A. Simons.  The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New perspectives☆ , 1990 .

[46]  Kevin T. Stevens,et al.  ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING IN IRELAND: BARRIERS TO, AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR, CHANGE , 1999 .

[47]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[48]  P. Khandwalla.  The Effect of Different Types of Competition on the Use of Management Controls , 1972 .

[49]  Paul Carter,et al.  Product diversity and costing system design choice: field study evidence , 2001 .

[50]  Tom Kennedy,et al.  The Impact of Activity‐Based Costing Techniques on Firm Performance , 2001 .

[51]  Alnoor Bhimani,et al.  Mapping methodological frontiers in cross-national management control research , 1999 .

[52]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[53]  Duncan Cramer,et al.  Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS for Windows: A Guide for Social Scientists , 1997 .