Solving combinatorial exchanges: optimality via a few partial bids

Auctions have been studied in economics and game theory for a long time as important resource allocation mechanisms in distributed environments. In recent years, their role has grown with the emergence of Internet and electronic commerce, as businesses and corporations leverage the new medium to streamline their procurement process. Many businesses are moving to an auction-based purchase method where they issue a request for quotes for the goods and services needed, and let the suppliers bid for a piece of the business. Driven by these fundamentals, auctions and algorithms related to them have become important and popular research topics in computer science. An exchange generalizes the auction mechanism to the setting with multiple buyers and sellers. Some familiar examples are the exchanges for equities and commodities, transportation, electricity, and the businessto-business exchanges. A combinatorial exchange is an exchange where buyers and sellers can bid on bundles (subsets) of goods. Combinatorial markets are desirable because items often have complementarity, and combinatorial bidding minimizes bidders’ risk of getting stuck with only a partial subset. It also improves the overall economic efficiency.

[1]  Subhash Suri,et al.  BOB: Improved winner determination in combinatorial auctions and generalizations , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[2]  David Levine,et al.  Winner determination in combinatorial auction generalizations , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[3]  Ronald M. Harstad,et al.  Computationally Manageable Combinational Auctions , 1998 .

[4]  Craig Boutilier,et al.  Solving Combinatorial Auctions Using Stochastic Local Search , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[5]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions , 2000, EC '00.

[7]  David Levine,et al.  CABOB: A Fast Optimal Algorithm for Combinatorial Auctions , 2001, IJCAI.

[8]  Y. Shoham,et al.  Truth revelation in rapid, approximately efficient combinatorial auctions , 2001 .

[9]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Constrained multi-object auctions and b-matching , 2000, Inf. Process. Lett..

[10]  S. Rassenti,et al.  A Combinatorial Auction Mechanism for Airport Time Slot Allocation , 1982 .

[11]  J. Håstad Clique is hard to approximate withinn1−ε , 1999 .

[12]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Taming the Computational Complexity of Combinatorial Auctions: Optimal and Approximate Approaches , 1999, IJCAI.

[13]  Moshe Tennenholtz Some Tractable Combinatorial Auctions , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[14]  Arild Stubhaug Acta Mathematica , 1886, Nature.

[15]  Subhash Suri,et al.  Improved Algorithms for Optimal Winner Determination in Combinatorial Auctions and Generalizations , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[16]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  eMediator: A Next Generation Electronic Commerce Server , 1999, AGENTS '00.