Pedagogy in Computer-Based Sport Training

The central question addressed in this paper is the appropriate formal representation of learning outcomes in the motor skill domain so they can be interpreted and manipulated by computers as well as humans for the implementation of Computer based Sport Training (CBST). Instructional design usually begins with the specification of behavioural objectives or intended learning outcomes. The field of educational psychology has long been sensitive to the desirability of establishing learning objectives for instruction. Computer-processable learning outcomes in the motor skill domain, however, seem to have remained the silent partner of learning outcomes in both the cognitive and affective domains. This paper presents a conceptual model of learning outcomes in the motor skill domain for the implementation of CBST. The heart of this model is to treat athlete's skill as a contextualized space of capability either actual or potential. Rowing is the sport chosen as the study domain.

[1]  A. J. Romiszowski,et al.  Producing Instructional Systems: Lesson Planning for Individualized and Group Learning Activities , 1984 .

[2]  Seungyong Lee,et al.  Motion retargeting and evaluation for VR-based training of free motions , 2003, The Visual Computer.

[3]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model , 2002 .

[4]  Sara de Freitas,et al.  Review of e-learning theories, frameworks and models. JISC e-learning models study report , 2004 .

[5]  D. Krathwohl.  A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[6]  E. Simpson.  THE CLASSIFICATION OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES, PSYCHOMOTOR DOMAIN. , 1966 .

[7]  Constanze Loschner,et al.  Biomechanics feedback for rowing , 2002, Journal of sports sciences.

[8]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[9]  B. Bloom.  Taxonomy of educational objectives , 1956 .

[10]  M. Driscoll.  Psychology of Learning for Instruction , 1993 .

[11]  G. Kovacs,et al.  Procedural skills in medicine: linking theory to practice. , 1997, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[12]  Timothy L.J. Ferris,et al.  A PSYCHOMOTOR SKILLS EXTENSION TO BLOOM'S TAXONOMY OF EDUCATION OBJECTIVES FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION , 2005 .

[13]  Eric S. Wallace,et al.  From the double pendulum model to full‐body simulation: evolution of golf swing modeling , 2008 .

[14]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[15]  Alastair Campbell Ritchie.  Dynamic modeling of ergometer and on-water rowing , 2008 .

[16]  Lester Gilbert,et al.  Principles of E-Learning Systems Engineering , 2007 .

[17]  Bebe Speed,et al.  Reality exists O.K.? An argument against constructivism and social constructionism , 1991 .

[18]  R. Cumming.  Language play in the classroom: encouraging children's intuitive creativity with words through poetry , 2007 .

[19]  Martin Eriksson,et al.  A Wireless, Unobtrusive Kayak Sensor Network Enabling Feedback Solutions , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Body Sensor Networks.

[20]  Wim de Boer,et al.  A changing pedagogy in E-learning: From acquisition to contribution , 2002, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[21]  Gareth Irwin,et al.  The conceptual process of skill progression development in artistic gymnastics , 2005, Journal of sports sciences.

[22]  Judith E. Rink,et al.  Teaching Physical Education for Learning , 1985 .

[23]  Shah Alam,et al.  Instructional Design and Learning Theory on the Development of a Multimedia Courseware , 2013 .

[24]  T. Anderson,et al.  Using Constructivism in Technology-Mediated Learning: Constructing Order out of the Chaos in the Literature , 1999 .

[25]  Yongdong Zhang,et al.  Automatic Video-based Analysis of Athlete Action , 2007, 14th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing (ICIAP 2007).

[26]  Hugh C. Davis,et al.  An evaluation of pedagogically informed parameterised questions for self‐assessment , 2008 .

[27]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Predicting quality in educational software: Evaluating For Learning, Usability and the Synergy between Them , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[28]  Andrea Gregg,et al.  Learning From Doing: Lessons Learned From Designing and Developing an Educational Software Within a Heterogeneous Group , 2021, Int. J. Web Based Learn. Teach. Technol..

[29]  Declan Kennedy,et al.  Writing and using learning outcomes: a practical guide , 2006 .

[30]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments , 1999 .

[31]  B. Bloom.  Learning for Mastery. Instruction and Curriculum. Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1. , 1968 .

[32]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Designing Effective Instruction , 1997 .

[33]  M. E. Gredler,et al.  Learning and Instruction: Theory into Practice , 1986 .

[34]  Barry D. Wilson.  Development in video technology for coaching , 2008 .

[35]  Anita J. Harrow.  A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain : a guidefor developing behavioral objectives / by Anita J. Harrow , 1972 .

[36]  D Hawkins,et al.  A new instrumentation system for training rowers. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  Richard Kirby,et al.  Development of a real‐time performance measurement and feedback system for alpine skiers , 2009 .

[38]  Robert M. Gagné,et al.  The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction , 1985 .

[39]  Leslie J. Briggs,et al.  Principles of Instructional Design , 1974 .

[40]  Adrian Kirkwood.  Instructional Technology: A Systematic Approach to Education - F.G. Knirk, K.L. Gustafson , 1987 .

[41]  Patrick Lacouture,et al.  A method of providing accurate velocity feedback of performance on an instrumented kayak ergometer , 2008 .