Shifting Attention from Theory to Practice in Philosophy of Biology

Traditional approaches in philosophy of biology focus attention on biological concepts, explanations, and theories, on evidential support and inter-theoretical relations. Newer approaches shift attention from concepts to conceptual practices, from theories to practices of theorizing, and from theoretical reduction to reductive retooling. In this article, I describe the shift from theory-focused to practice-centered philosophy of science and explain how it is leading philosophers to abandon fundamentalist assumptions associated with traditional approaches in philosophy of science and to embrace scientific pluralism. This article comes in three parts, each illustrating the shift from theory-focused to practice-centered epistemology. The first illustration shows how shifting philosophical attention to conceptual practice reveals how molecular biologists succeed in identifying coherent causal strands within systems of bewildering complexity. The second illustration suggests that analyzing how a multiplicity of alternative models function in practice provides an illuminating approach for understanding the nature of theoretical knowledge in evolutionary biology. The third illustration demonstrates how framing reductionism in terms of the reductive retooling of practice offers an informative perspective for understanding why putting DNA at the center of biological research has been incredibly productive throughout much of biology. Each illustration begins by describing how traditional theory-focused philosophical approaches are laden with fundamentalist assumptions and then proceeds to show that shifting attention to practice undermines these assumptions and motivates a philosophy of scientific pluralism.

[1]  P. Godfrey‐Smith Darwinian populations and natural selection , 2009 .

[2]  Kenneth F. Schaffner The Watson-Crick Model and Reductionism , 1976 .

[3]  P. Portin,et al.  The Concept of the Gene: Short History and Present Status , 1993, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[4]  C. Kenneth Waters,et al.  Causes that Make a Difference , 2007 .

[5]  Marcel Weber,et al.  Philosophy of experimental biology , 2004 .

[6]  Evelyn Fox Keller,et al.  Keywords in evolutionary biology , 1994 .

[7]  R. Kohler, Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life. , 1995 .

[8]  P. Kleingeld,et al.  The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2013 .

[9]  Jamie Peck,et al.  Cycles of contingency , 2004 .

[10]  Russell D. Gray,et al.  Introduction: what Is developmental systems theory? , 2001 .

[11]  A. Love,et al.  Aspects of Reductive Explanation in Biological Science: Intrinsicality, Fundamentality, and Temporality , 2011, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[12]  Marc Ereshefsky Species Pluralism and Anti-Realism , 1998, Philosophy of Science.

[13]  D. Kirk,et al.  A twelve-step program for evolving multicellularity and a division of labor. , 2005, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[14]  M. Travisano,et al.  Experimental evolution of multicellularity , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  William C. Wimsatt Reductive Explanation: A Functional Account , 1974 .

[16]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Pluralism in evolutionary theory , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[17]  A. Hoffman,et al.  Neutral models in biology , 1987 .

[18]  J. Dupré Natural Kinds and Biological Taxa , 1981 .

[19]  Elliott Sober,et al.  The Nature of Selection , 1984 .

[20]  C. Waters,et al.  What was classical genetics? , 2004, Studies in history and philosophy of science.

[21]  P. Griffiths Genetic Information: A Metaphor in Search of a Theory , 2001, Philosophy of Science.

[22]  L. Darden,et al.  Interfield Theories , 1977, Philosophy of Science.

[23]  Alexander Rosenberg,et al.  The structure of biological science , 1986 .

[24]  Yvonne Herz,et al.  The Structure Of Science Problems In The Logic Of Scientific Explanation , 2016 .

[25]  C. Kenneth Waters,et al.  Tempered Realism about the Force of Selection , 1991, Philosophy of Science.

[26]  Thomas Fogle,et al.  The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution: The Dissolution of Protein Coding Genes in Molecular Biology , 2000 .

[27]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  The Scientific Image , 1980 .

[28]  K. Sterelny Explanatory pluralism in evolutionary biology , 1996 .

[29]  C. Waters What concept analysis in philosophy of science should be (and why competing philosophical analyses of gene concepts cannot be tested by polling scientists). , 2004, History and philosophy of the life sciences.

[30]  P. Griffiths,et al.  The many faces of the gene , 1999 .

[31]  W. Wimsatt Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality , 2007 .

[32]  P Kitcher,et al.  1953 and all that: a tale of two sciences. , 1984, The Philosophical review.

[33]  T. Nickles Scientific discovery, case studies , 1980 .

[34]  R. Michod,et al.  Evolution of Complexity in the Volvocine Algae: Transitions in Individuality Through Darwin's Eye , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  R. Burian On Conceptual Change in Biology: The Case of the Gene , 2004 .

[36]  C. Waters Okasha's Unintended Argument for Toolbox Theorizing , 2011 .

[37]  R. Giere Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach , 1991 .

[38]  Nancy L. Maull,et al.  Unifying science without reduction , 1977 .

[39]  Hans-Jörg Rheinberger,et al.  The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution , 2008 .

[40]  S. Okasha Evolution and the Levels of Selection , 2007 .

[41]  Mauricio Suárez,et al.  The Tool‐Box of Science , 1995 .

[42]  I. L. Heisler,et al.  Alternative formulations of multilevel selection , 1988 .

[43]  Karola Stotz,et al.  How biologists conceptualize genes: An empirical study , 2004 .

[44]  C. Waters Why Genic and Multilevel Selection Theories Are Here to Stay* , 2005, Philosophy of Science.

[45]  Robert A. Wilson Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays , 1999 .

[46]  R. Giere The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science , 2003 .

[47]  Sahotra Sarkar,et al.  Biological Information: A Skeptical Look at Some Central Dogmas of Molecular Biology , 1996 .

[48]  S. Sarkar The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives , 2001 .

[49]  C. Kenneth Waters,et al.  Genes Made Molecular , 1994, Philosophy of Science.

[50]  Gregory Radick,et al.  The Century of the Gene , 2001, Heredity.

[51]  Deborah G. Mayo,et al.  Models of Group Selection , 1987, Philosophy of Science.

[52]  C. Waters,et al.  Beyond Theoretical Reduction and Layer-Cake Antireduction: How DNA Retooled Genetics and Transformed Biological Practice , 2008 .

[53]  William C. Wimsatt,et al.  Reductionistic Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy , 1982 .

[54]  I. Hacking,et al.  Representing and Intervening. , 1986 .

[55]  R. Wojcicki,et al.  Theories and Models in Scientific Processes , 1995 .

[56]  Nancy Cartwright,et al.  Theories: Tools versus Models , 2008 .

[57]  Erik M. Jorgensen,et al.  Axons break in animals lacking β-spectrin , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.