Competition and control of smellmelon (Cucumis melo var. dudaim Naud.) in cotton

Abstract Smellmelon is becoming a problem weed in southern Texas and Louisiana cotton-producing areas. Experiments evaluating the density and duration of smellmelon competition are necessary for the recommendation of appropriate control practices to minimize yield loss. In 1999 and 2000, field experiments were initiated to determine the density, critical period of competition, and potential control measures for smellmelon in cotton. Although the degree of competition differed between the years, similar trends were observed with respect to smellmelon density. As few as 2 or 3 smellmelon plants 10 m−1 row reduced yield at least 17% each year. When densities were increased to 5 or 10 plants 10 m−1 row, yield reductions increased to at least 34%. Results from the duration of smellmelon competition in 1999 and 2000 indicated that cotton should remain smellmelon free for 1 to 7 wk after planting (WAP) and 2.5 to 6 WAP, respectively. Results from the control studies indicate that smellmelon size at application influences control. Early-season control strategies are necessary to reduce yield losses associated with smellmelon competition. Nomenclature: Bromoxynil; fluometuron; glyphosate; MSMA; pyrithiobac; smellmelon, Cucumis melo var. dudaim Naud. CUMMD; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘DPL 436 RR’.

[1]  Robert L. Zimdahl,et al.  Weed-Crop Competition: A Review , 2004 .

[2]  R. Zimdahl Weed-Crop Competition , 2004 .

[3]  J. Chandler,et al.  Devil's-Claw (Proboscidea louisianica) and Smellmelon (Cucumis melo var. dudaim) Control in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with Pyrithiobac , 1998, Weed Technology.

[4]  J. Chandler,et al.  The Critical Period of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Field Corn (Zea mays) , 1996, Weed Science.

[5]  James M. Chandler,et al.  Influence of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Density and Period of Competition on Cotton Yield , 1987, Weed Science.

[6]  K. A. Gomez,et al.  Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. , 1984 .

[7]  T. T. Bauman,et al.  Field Competition between Ivyleaf Morningglory (Ipomea hederacea) and Soybeans (Glycine max) , 1984, Weed Science.

[8]  G. Buchanan,et al.  Competition of Common Cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) , 1982, Weed Science.

[9]  G. Buchanan,et al.  Competition of Four Morningglory(Ipomoeaspp.) Species with Cotton(Gossypium hirsutum) , 1978 .

[10]  J. Chandler Competition of Spurred Anoda, Velvetleaf, Prickly Sida, and Venice Mallow in Cotton , 1977, Weed Science.

[11]  L. R. Oliver,et al.  Field Competition Between Tall Morningglory and Soybean. I. Growth Analysis , 1976, Weed Science.

[12]  J. Mcmahon,et al.  Growing degree days as a measure of temperature effects on cotton , 1972 .

[13]  Earl R. Burns,et al.  Weed Competition in Cotton. I. Sicklepod and Tall Morningglory , 1971, Weed Science.

[14]  W. Reese,et al.  Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas , 1971 .

[15]  R. Cole,et al.  Morningglory Competition in Soybeans , 1966 .

[16]  D. Staniforth Competitive Effects of Three Foxtail Species on Soybeans , 1965 .