Structured abstracts in information retrieval from biomedical databases: a literature survey

Clear guidelines have been provided for structuring the abstracts of original clinical research and review articles and, in the last 10 years, several major medical journals have adopted the policy of publishing all such articles with structured abstracts. Proponents claim that structured abstracts enhance peer review, improve information retrieval, and ease critical appraisal. However, some journals have not adopted them and their opponents claim they make articles longer and harder to read and restrict author originality. Previous research on structured abstracts has focused on how closely they follow prescribed structure and include the salient points of the full text, rather than their role in increasing the usefulness of the article.

[1]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Structured abstracts of proposals for clinical and epidemiological studies. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  M. Gardner,et al.  More informative abstracts revisited. , 1990, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[3]  B P Squires,et al.  Structured abstracts of original research and review articles. , 1990, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[4]  Chris D. Paice,et al.  Constructing literature abstracts by computer: Techniques and prospects , 1990, Inf. Process. Manag..

[5]  T R Einarson,et al.  Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. , 1994, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[6]  M. Heller Structured abstracts: a modest dissent. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  Françoise Salager-Meyer Medical English Abstracts: How Well Are They Structured?. , 1991 .

[8]  John A. Johnson Quality of abstracts of original research articles in CMAJ in 1989 , 1991 .

[9]  B L Humphreys,et al.  Structured abstracts in MEDLINE, 1989-1991. , 1995, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[10]  T R Einarson,et al.  Quality of abstracts of original research articles in CMAJ in 1989. , 1991, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[11]  Jack Froom,et al.  Presentation Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts , 1993 .

[12]  R. Brian Haynes Dissent more informative Abstracts: Current status and evaluation , 1993 .

[13]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Presentation structured abstracts of proposals for clinical and epidemiological studies , 1991 .

[14]  M Evans Structured abstracts: rationale and construction. , 1993, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[15]  S B Thacker,et al.  A proposal for more informative abstracts of review articles. , 1988, Annals of internal medicine.

[16]  H. Rubin,et al.  More Informative Abstracts of Articles Describing Clinical Practice Guidelines , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  J Froom,et al.  Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  E. Huth,et al.  Structured abstracts for papers reporting clinical trials. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[19]  Françoise Salager-Meyer Medical English abstracts: How well are they structured? , 1991, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..