Benefiting from Open Innovation: A Multidimensional Model of Absorptive Capacity *

While recent studies shed some light on the performance implications of open innovation, there is a gap in understanding how firms can translate their openness into innovation outcomes. In particular, it is unclear whether—and if so, how—firms can create a competitive advantage in product innovation by tapping into external sources of innovation. To address this gap, this study conceptualizes multidimensional components of absorptive capacity and develops a nomological network that explicates relationships between these components and competitive advantage in product innovation. By marrying the open innovation and absorptive capacity perspectives, higher-order models of absorptive capacity are proposed which delineate the underlying processes to recognize, assimilate, and exploit external sources of innovation. The empirical analysis of the nomological network based on original survey data reveals important findings. First, there is a positive indirect baseline association between external technological resource access and competitive advantage in product innovation, mediated by the firm's technology-related capabilities. Second, components of absorptive capacity modify this indirect baseline relationship. Recognition capacity is positively associated with external technological resource access and therefore, operates as an antecedent to the proposed baseline relationship. Assimilation capacity constitutes a relevant condition to the proposed baseline relationship. The indirect association between external technological resource access and competitive advantage in product innovation is dependent on the level of assimilation capacity. Exploitation capacity has an additional and independent direct positive association with competitive advantage in product innovation. This study contributes to the open innovation literature by delineating organizational processes that help to explain interfirm differences in benefiting from external sources of innovation. In addition, this study adds to the absorptive capacity literature by developing and validating a set of measures that captures, individually and in concert, three components of absorptive capacity.

[1]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[2]  James B. Wilcox,et al.  The Pretest in Survey Research: Issues and Preliminary Findings: , 1982 .

[3]  Ralf Wilden,et al.  A bibliometric review of open innovation: setting a research agenda , 2016 .

[4]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Creative Imitation: Exploring the Case of Cross-Industry Innovation , 2010 .

[5]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Open Versus Closed Innovation: A Model of Discovery and Divergence , 2010 .

[6]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[7]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .

[8]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[9]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Perspective: The Stage‐Gate® Idea‐to‐Launch Process—Update, What's New, and NexGen Systems* , 2008 .

[10]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[11]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[12]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[13]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[14]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective , 2007 .

[15]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Selection Capability: How Capability Gaps and Internal Social Frictions Affect Internal and External Strategic Renewal , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[17]  V. Chiesa,et al.  The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm , 2011 .

[18]  Mauro Caetano,et al.  Roadmapping for technology push and partnership: A contribution for open innovation environments , 2011 .

[19]  S. Dopson,et al.  When Does Search Openness Really Matter? A Contingency Study of Health‐Care Innovation Projects , 2013 .

[20]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Mining External R&D , 2011 .

[21]  Gabriel Szulanski Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[22]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[23]  Gianmario Verona,et al.  Unbundling Dynamic Capabilities: an Exploratory Study of Continuous Product Innovation , 2003 .

[24]  Eoin Whelan,et al.  Creating Employee Networks That Deliver Open Innovation , 2011 .

[25]  Chiara Verbano,et al.  Open innovation and new issues in R&D organization and personnel management , 2012 .

[26]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Jin Chen,et al.  The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms , 2011 .

[28]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[29]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[30]  Keld Laursen,et al.  Linking Customer Interaction and Innovation: The Mediating Role of New Organizational Practices , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[31]  Gianmario Verona A Resource-Based View of Product Development , 1999 .

[32]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models , 2012 .

[33]  Cristina Rossi-Lamastra,et al.  Open innovation and within-industry diversification in small and medium enterprises: The case of open source software firms , 2014 .

[34]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[35]  Erwin Danneels Trying to become a different type of company: dynamic capability at Smith Corona , 2011 .

[36]  M. Knudsen,et al.  Some immediate – but negative – effects of openness on product development performance , 2011 .

[37]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field , 2009 .

[38]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  C. Benedetto,et al.  Organizing for Inbound Open Innovation: How External Consultants and a Dedicated R&D Unit Influence Product Innovation Performance† , 2016 .

[40]  Gaby Odekerken-Schröder,et al.  Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchial construct models: guidelines and impirical illustration , 2009 .

[41]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[42]  Boris Durisin,et al.  Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization , 2007 .

[43]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[44]  D. Teece,et al.  Cross-border Market Co-creation, Dynamic Capabilities and the Entrepreneurial Theory of the Multinational Enterprise , 2010 .

[45]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Engaging with Startups to Enhance Corporate Innovation , 2015, Open Innovation Results.

[46]  Ammon Salter,et al.  No Soliciting: Strategies for Managing Unsolicited Innovative Ideas , 2011 .

[47]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Co-evolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities , 1999 .

[48]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[49]  Benjamin Hughes,et al.  Knowledge Arbitrage in Global Pharma: A Synthetic View of Absorptive Capacity and Open Innovation , 2010 .

[50]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Managing Unsolicited Ideas for R&D , 2012 .

[51]  Erwin Danneels Survey measures of first‐ and second‐order competences , 2016 .

[52]  Michael Song,et al.  Marketing and technology resource complementarity : An analysis of their Interaction Effect in two environmental contexts , 2005 .

[53]  Gregory N. Stock,et al.  Creating Dynamic Capability: The Role of Intertemporal Integration, Knowledge Retention, and Interpretation , 2006 .

[54]  Dovev Lavie The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-Based View , 2006 .

[55]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[56]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[57]  G. Day The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[58]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[59]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[60]  A. Albers,et al.  Open Innovation in the Automotive Industry , 2010 .

[61]  A. Groen,et al.  Open Innovation in Practice: Goal Complementarity and Closed NPD Networks to Explain Differences in Innovation Performance for SMEs in the Medical Devices Sector , 2012 .

[62]  S. Zahra,et al.  The Role of External Knowledge Sources and Organizational Design in the Process of Opportunity Exploitation , 2013 .

[63]  Palie Smart,et al.  Exploring Open Innovation Practice in Firm-Nonprofit Engagements: A Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective , 2009 .

[64]  Onno S. W. F. Omta,et al.  Identification of Competencies for Professionals in Open Innovation Teams , 2010 .

[65]  D. Faems,et al.  Book review: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm / by H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West. - Oxford University Press. - ISBN 978-0-19929072-7 , 2008 .

[66]  J. Spender,et al.  The Resource-Based View: A Review and Assessment of Its Critiques , 2009 .

[67]  Erwin Danneels The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[68]  Sandro Montresor,et al.  The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries , 2015 .

[69]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[70]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[71]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box , 2007 .

[72]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation , 2013 .

[73]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[74]  Helle Alsted Søndergaard,et al.  Neither invented nor shared here: The impact and management of attitudes for the adoption of open innovation practices , 2014 .

[75]  R. Bagozzi A Prospectus for Theory Construction in Marketing , 1984 .

[76]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[77]  E. Huizingh Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives , 2011 .

[78]  Erwin Danneels Organizational antecedents of second‐order competences , 2008 .

[79]  R. Rohrbeck Harnessing a Network of Experts for Competitive Advantage: Technology Scouting in the ICT Industry , 2010 .

[80]  Bart Clarysse,et al.  Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries , 2010 .

[81]  M. Dodgson,et al.  The Role of Technology in the Shift Towards Open Innovation: The Case of Procter & Gamble , 2006 .

[82]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Openness, knowledge, innovation and growth in UK business services , 2011 .

[83]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  Toward A Taxonomy of Multidimensional Constructs , 1998 .

[84]  Catherine L. Wang,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda , 2007 .

[85]  Wolfgang Sofka,et al.  Specialized Search and Innovation Performance – Evidence Across Europe , 2010 .

[86]  J. Edwards Multidimensional Constructs in Organizational Behavior Research: An Integrative Analytical Framework , 2001 .

[87]  V. Chiesa,et al.  Unravelling the Process from Closed to Open Innovation: Evidence from Mature, Asset-Intensive Industries , 2010 .

[88]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[89]  C. Benedetto Comment on 'is open innovation a field of study or a communication barrier to theory development?' , 2010 .

[90]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[91]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[92]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[93]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for ideation: individual-level openness and idea generation in R&D contexts , 2015 .

[94]  Udo Zander,et al.  The Inside Track: On the Important (But Neglected) Role of Customers in the Resource - Based View of Strategy and Firm Growth , 2005 .

[95]  W. Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners , 2014 .

[96]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[97]  David Jacobson,et al.  Managing open incremental process innovation : absorptive capacity and distributed learning , 2012 .

[98]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field , 2009 .

[99]  Kazuhiro Asakawa,et al.  Firms' Open Innovation Policies, Laboratories' External Collaborations, and Laboratories' R&D Performance , 2010 .

[100]  Jan Henrik Sieg,et al.  Managerial Challenges in Open Innovation: A Study of Innovation Intermediation in the Chemical Industry , 2010 .

[101]  Véronique Ambrosini,et al.  What are Dynamic Capabilities and are They a Useful Construct in Strategic Management? , 2009 .

[102]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[103]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[104]  Colin C.J. Cheng,et al.  When is open innovation beneficial? The role of strategic orientation , 2014 .