Online assessments: Exploring perspectives of university students

The United Arab Emirates is committed to integrating technology into higher education. In this study the researchers aim to explore the perspectives of university students on online assessments. An understanding of students’ views can help identify obstacles and promotors in embracing online assessments at the undergraduate level. The social constructivist epistemology has been used in this qualitative study to understand students’ preferences, apprehensions and acceptance of online assessments. Semi-structured focus group discussions were carried out after recruiting 41 university students, using convenience and snowball sampling methods. Thematic content analysis was applied to the data. This study highlighted that students did not comprehend the need for online assessments. Concerns regarding technological incompetence of students and teachers alongside distrust in the technology infrastructure were stressed. Students felt online assessments were restrictive for the science courses and had resulted in falling grades; probably due to the increasing dependence on multiple choice questions. Students also expressed the importance of constructive, timely and personalized feedback. Students need to be convinced of the usefulness of the transition to online assessment before they agree with it. It is evident through this study that student acceptance would increase with a gradual transition towards online assessments alongside technological training for both students and faculty. Active individualized interaction with instructors is important to students, furthermore preferences and concerns emphasized by students should be addressed to successfully integrate online assessments into higher education.

[1]  Sara Rojo,et al.  United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.) , 2000, Intellectual Property Laws of the Arab Countries.

[2]  Lauren J. Breen,et al.  Australian Community Psychologist , 2011 .

[3]  Dan Ş. Sîmpălean,et al.  Medical Students’ Acceptance of Online Assessment Systems , 2016 .

[4]  Niyi Awofeso,et al.  Learners’ perceptions of instructor feedback in e-learning courses – findings from HBMSU, United Arab Emirates , 2017 .

[5]  F. Dochy,et al.  Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review1 , 2005 .

[6]  Marsha C. Lovett,et al.  How learning works , 2010 .

[7]  D. Halpern,et al.  Applying the Science of Learning to the University and Beyond: Teaching for Long-Term Retention and Transfer , 2003 .

[8]  Piotr Betlej,et al.  E-Examinations from Student's Perspective - the Future of Knowledge Evaluation , 2013 .

[9]  Julie G. Nyquist,et al.  How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching , 2012 .

[10]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  The teacher as action researcher: using technology to capture pedagogic form , 2008 .

[11]  R. B. Kuriakose,et al.  Student Perceptions to the Use of Paperless Technology in Assessments–A Case Study Using Clickers , 2016 .

[12]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[13]  Michael F. Spivey,et al.  Classroom Versus Online Assessment , 2014 .

[14]  D. Nicol,et al.  Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice , 2006 .

[15]  Mansour Naser Alraja,et al.  E-Examinations for Management Students in Oman , 2017 .

[16]  Samuel Liyala,et al.  Theory of Reasoned Action as an Underpinning to Technological Innovation Adoption Studies , 2016 .

[17]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Gregory A. Brown,et al.  Online quizzes promote inconsistent improvements on in-class test performance in introductory anatomy and physiology. , 2015, Advances in physiology education.

[19]  Ünal Çakıroğlu,et al.  STUDENTS’ PREFERENCES IN ONLINE ASSESSMENT PROCESS: INFLUENCES ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCES , 2017 .

[20]  Raymond L. Debus,et al.  Effects of internally focused feedback and attributional feedback on enhancement of academic self-concept , 1991 .

[21]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  A. E. Ogletree,et al.  Transition to Online Assessments: A Personal Perspective of Meeting Common Core State Standards in an Elementary School in Georgia , 2014 .

[23]  Mary Annette Rose,et al.  Online education: needs assessment for faculty development. , 2005, Journal of continuing education in nursing.

[24]  A. Barusch,et al.  Rigor in Qualitative Social Work Research: A Review of Strategies Used in Published Articles , 2011 .