Recognizing disguised faces

Across three experiments, we evaluated the effects of “disguises” on observers’ face identification performance using naturalistic images in which individuals posed with a variety of wigs and eyeglasses. Experiment 1 tested recognition memory performance with and without disguises and showed that any changes in these facial attributes hindered performance, replicating previous findings. More interestingly, Experiment 1 revealed that a change in hairstyle or the removal of eyeglasses had more impact on performance than did the addition of eyeglasses. In Experiment 2, disguised and undisguised faces were presented upright or inverted to examine whether the performance decrements seen in Experiment 1 were attributable to disruption of processing strategies for faces. Despite showing an overall effect of disguise on performance, there was no interaction between inversion and disguise. This suggests that disguises are not directly affecting processing strategies, but instead disguises are likely encoded as part of the overall representation. Similarly, in Experiment 3, the composite face paradigm was used to examine whether the impact of disguises is attributable to disruption of holistic processing for faces. Again, we found an overall effect of disguise on performance, but here we also observed that the presence of disguises interacted with participants’ tendency to form holistic face representations.

[1]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Stimulus-specific effects in face recognition over changes in viewpoint , 1998, Vision Research.

[2]  A. Baddeley,et al.  When face recognition fails. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[3]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognition of unfamiliar faces , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing? , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  B. Rossion Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: the perceptual field hypothesis. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[7]  L. D. Harmon The recognition of faces. , 1973, Scientific American.

[8]  Michael J. Tarr,et al.  The role of surface pigmentation for recognition revealed by contrast reversal in faces and Greebles , 2005, Vision Research.

[9]  Paul Miller,et al.  Verification of face identities from images captured on video. , 1999 .

[10]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[12]  G. Hole Configurational Factors in the Perception of Unfamiliar Faces , 1994, Perception.

[13]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Role of Features and Second-order Spatial Relations in Face Discrimination, Face Recognition, and Individual Face Skills: Behavioral and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Should we reject the expertise hypothesis? , 2007, Cognition.

[16]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  B. Rossion Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[18]  B Julesz,et al.  Masking in Visual Recognition: Effects of Two-Dimensional Filtered Noise , 1973, Science.

[19]  Brad Duchaine,et al.  Dissociations of Face and Object Recognition in Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  S. Carey,et al.  Developmental changes in the representation of faces. , 1977, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[21]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[22]  R. L. Terry,et al.  How wearing eyeglasses affects facial recognition , 1993 .

[23]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Effects of facial transformations on accuracy of recognition. , 1994, The Journal of social psychology.

[25]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[26]  P. Schyns,et al.  Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition , 1997, Cognition.

[27]  J. Tanaka The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[29]  P. Sinha,et al.  Contribution of Color to Face Recognition , 2002, Perception.

[30]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[31]  G. Yovel,et al.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  W. L. Braje Illumination encoding in face recognition: effect of position shift. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[33]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[34]  Wendy L. Braje,et al.  Illumination effects in face recognition , 1998, Psychobiology.

[35]  G. Hole,et al.  Effects of Geometric Distortions on Face-Recognition Performance , 2002, Perception.

[36]  Differential Effects of Transformation on Facial Recognition in Young Children: A Pilot Study , 1999, Perceptual and motor skills.

[37]  M. Riesenhuber,et al.  Task effects, performance levels, features, configurations, and holistic face processing: a reply to Rossion. , 2009, Acta psychologica.