The influence of floral traits on specialization and modularity of plant-pollinator networks in a biodiversity hotspot in the Peruvian Andes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Modularity is a ubiquitous and important structural property of ecological networks which describes the relative strengths of sets of interacting species and gives insights into the dynamics of ecological communities. However, this has rarely been studied in species-rich, tropical plant-pollinator networks. Working in a biodiversity hotspot in the Peruvian Andes we assessed the structure of quantitative plant-pollinator networks in nine valleys, quantifying modularity among networks, defining the topological roles of species and the influence of floral traits on specialization. METHODS A total of 90 transects were surveyed for plants and pollinators at different altitudes and across different life zones. Quantitative modularity (QuanBiMo) was used to detect modularity and six indices were used to quantify specialization. KEY RESULTS All networks were highly structured, moderately specialized and significantly modular regardless of size. The strongest hubs were Baccharis plants, Apis mellifera, Bombus funebris and Diptera spp., which were the most ubiquitous and abundant species with the longest phenologies. Species strength showed a strong association with the modular structure of plant-pollinator networks. Hubs and connectors were the most centralized participants in the networks and were ranked highest (high generalization) when quantifying specialization with most indices. However, complementary specialization d' quantified hubs and connectors as moderately specialized. Specialization and topological roles of species were remarkably constant across some sites, but highly variable in others. Networks were dominated by ecologically and functionally generalist plant species with open access flowers which are closely related taxonomically with similar morphology and rewards. Plants associated with hummingbirds had the highest level of complementary specialization and exclusivity in modules (functional specialists) and the longest corollas. CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated that the topology of networks in this tropical montane environment was non-random and highly organized. Our findings underline that specialization indices convey different concepts of specialization and hence quantify different aspects, and that measuring specialization requires careful consideration of what defines a specialist.

[1]  R. Martins,et al.  Seasonal Abundance and Species Composition of Flower-Visiting Flies , 2001 .

[2]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  The macroecology of phylogenetically structured hummingbird–plant networks , 2015 .

[3]  M E J Newman,et al.  Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Ecological networks - foodwebs and beyond , 2009 .

[5]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Jochen Fründ,et al.  What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits? , 2008, Ecology.

[7]  Daniel B. Stouffer,et al.  Nestedness versus modularity in ecological networks: two sides of the same coin? , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[8]  Jens M. Olesen,et al.  Structure of a plant–flower‐visitor network in the high‐altitude sub‐alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands , 2003 .

[9]  R. Guimerà,et al.  The worldwide air transportation network: Anomalous centrality, community structure, and cities' global roles , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  Pollination Syndromes and Floral Specialization , 2004 .

[11]  J. Ghazoul,et al.  Determinants of the microstructure of plant–pollinator networks , 2014 .

[12]  J. Bosch,et al.  Plant-pollinator networks: adding the pollinator's perspective. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[13]  J. Manning,et al.  Matching floral and pollinator traits through guild convergence and pollinator ecotype formation. , 2014, Annals of botany.

[14]  D. Wege,et al.  Key Areas for Threatened Birds in the Neotropics , 1995 .

[15]  Ana M. Martín González,et al.  Specialization in Plant-Hummingbird Networks Is Associated with Species Richness, Contemporary Precipitation and Quaternary Climate-Change Velocity , 2011, PloS one.

[16]  Jens M. Olesen,et al.  Centrality measures and the importance of generalist species in pollination networks , 2010 .

[17]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Ecological networks : beyond food webs Ecological networks – beyond food webs , 2008 .

[18]  J. Olesen,et al.  The openness of a flower and its number of flower-visitor species , 2007 .

[19]  Species Richness and Pollen Loads of Hummingbirds Using Forest Fragments in Southern Costa Rica1 , 2001 .

[20]  L. Holdridge.  Life zone ecology. , 1967 .

[21]  A. Stattersfield,et al.  Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation , 1998 .

[22]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters , 1996 .

[23]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity , 2007 .

[24]  M. Newman,et al.  Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks , 2008, Nature.

[25]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[26]  J. Ollerton,et al.  How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals , 2011 .

[27]  Brody Sandel,et al.  Historical climate‐change influences modularity and nestedness of pollination networks , 2013 .

[28]  Achim Gathmann,et al.  Foraging ranges of solitary bees , 2002 .

[29]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Drivers of compartmentalization in a Mediterranean pollination network , 2012 .

[30]  Nico Blüthgen,et al.  Why network analysis is often disconnected from community ecology: A critique and an ecologist's guide , 2010 .

[31]  J. Ollerton,et al.  Is the notion that species interactions are stronger and more specialized in the tropics a zombie idea? , 2016 .

[32]  Jeff Ollerton,et al.  Latitudinal trends in plant‐pollinator interactions: are tropical plants more specialised? , 2002 .

[33]  J. Ollerton,et al.  Multiple meanings and modes: on the many ways to be a generalist flower , 2007 .

[34]  Steiner,et al.  Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  A. Tupayachi.  Flora de la Cordillera del Vilcanota , 2005 .

[36]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Ana M. Martín González,et al.  High proportion of smaller ranged hummingbird species coincides with ecological specialization across the Americas , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Measuring specialization in species interaction networks , 2006, BMC Ecology.

[39]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[40]  J. Ollerton,et al.  Pollinator effectiveness of native and non-native flower visitors to an apparently generalist Andean shrub, Duranta mandonii (Verbenaceae) , 2012 .

[41]  Rodolfo Dirzo,et al.  Analysis of a hyper-diverse seed dispersal network: modularity and underlying mechanisms. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[42]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Specialization of Mutualistic Interaction Networks Decreases toward Tropical Latitudes , 2012, Current Biology.

[43]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks , 2009 .

[44]  J. Olesen,et al.  Ecological modules and roles of species in heathland plant-insect flower visitor networks. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[45]  A. Dafni,et al.  The endangered Iris atropurpurea (Iridaceae) in Israel: honey-bees, night-sheltering male bees and female solitary bees as pollinators. , 2013, Annals of botany.

[46]  Rudolf Schmid,et al.  A field guide to the families and genera of woody plants of northwest South America (Colombia, Ecuador, Peru), with supplementary notes on herbaceous taxa , 1993 .

[47]  A. Klein,et al.  Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  A. Cosacov,et al.  Geographical differentiation in floral traits across the distribution range of the Patagonian oil-secreting Calceolaria polyrhiza: do pollinators matter? , 2014, Annals of botany.

[49]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions , 2002 .

[50]  Susanne A. Fritz,et al.  Ecological, historical and evolutionary determinants of modularity in weighted seed-dispersal networks. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[51]  John Skvoretz,et al.  Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[52]  F. Perfectti,et al.  Evolution of pollination niches and floral divergence in the generalist plant Erysimum mediohispanicum. , 2014, Annals of botany.

[53]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  A method for detecting modules in quantitative bipartite networks , 2013, 1304.3218.

[54]  J. Ollerton,et al.  Phenotype space and floral typology: towards an objective assessment of pollination syndromes , 2000 .

[55]  W. Patefield,et al.  An Efficient Method of Generating Random R × C Tables with Given Row and Column Totals , 1981 .

[56]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[57]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Habitat loss and the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. , 2006, Ecology letters.