Scenarios in user-centred design-setting the stage for reflection and action

This paper will discuss three examples of use of scenarios in user-centred design. The examples are from projects that the author has been involved with. Common to them are the use of scenarios to support the tensions between reflection and action, between typical and critical situations, and between plus and minus situations. The paper will illustrate how a variety of more specific scenarios emphasising, for example, critical situations, or even caricatures of situations are very useful for helping groups of users and designers being creative in design. Emphasising creativity in design is a very different view on the design process than normally represented in usability work or software/requirements engineering, where generalising users' actions are much more important than the, in this paper, suggested richness of and contradiction between actual use situations. In general the paper proposes to attune scenarios to the particular purposes of the situations that they are to be used in, and to be very selective based on these purposes.

[1]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Methods & tools: context: an active choice in usability work , 1998, INTR.

[2]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Object-Oriented Modeling and Design , 1991, TOOLS.

[3]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Toward a cooperative experimental system development approach , 1997 .

[4]  Kim Halskov Madsen.  Initiative in Participatory Design , 1996 .

[5]  T.M. Duffy,et al.  Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development [Book Review] , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[6]  Christiane Floyd,et al.  Outline of a Paradigm Change in Software Engineering , 1993 .

[7]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Applying Activity Theory to Video Analysis , 1996 .

[8]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[9]  Ellen Tove Christiansen,et al.  A conceptual toolbox for designing CSCW applications , 1994 .

[10]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[11]  Ron J. Patton,et al.  Methods for fault diagnosis in rail vehicle traction and braking systems , 1995 .

[12]  Julia Gardner.  Strengthening the focus on users' working practices , 1999, CACM.

[13]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Cognition and communication at work: Users and designers in mutual activity: An analysis of cooperative activities in systems design , 1996 .

[14]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Scenario-based design of cooperative systems , 2000 .

[15]  James E. Rumbaugh,et al.  Object-Oriented Modelling and Design , 1991 .

[16]  Christina Nielsen,et al.  Testing in the field , 1998, Proceedings. 3rd Asia Pacific Computer Human Interaction (Cat. No.98EX110).

[17]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Systemudvikling og systemudviklingsmetode , 1984 .

[18]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Cooperative design: techniques and experiences from the Scandinavian scene , 1995 .

[19]  Dan Shapiro,et al.  CSCW: Discipline or Paradigm? A Sociological Perspective , 1991, ECSCW.

[20]  S. Bødker,et al.  Scenarios as Springboards in Design , 1993 .

[21]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  The task-artifact cycle , 1991 .

[22]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The use-case construct in object-oriented software engineering , 1995 .

[23]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach To User Interface Design , 1990 .

[24]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Creating contexts for design , 1995 .

[25]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Understanding practice: video as a medium for reflection and design (excerpt) , 1992 .

[26]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  CSCW challenges: cooperative design in engineering projects , 1993, CACM.

[27]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Understanding Representation in Design , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..