CGM accuracy: Contrasting CE marking with the governmental controls of the USA (FDA) and Australia (TGA): A narrative review

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence updated guidance for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in 2022, recommending that CGM be available to all people living with type 1 diabetes. Manufacturers can trade in the UK with Conformité Européenne (CE) marking without an initial national assessment. The regulatory process for CGM CE marking, in contrast to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) process, is described. Manufacturers operating in the UK provided clinical accuracy studies submitted for CE marking. Critical appraisal of the studies shows several CGM devices have CE marking for wide‐ranging indications beyond available data, unlike FDA and TGA approval. The FDA and TGA use tighter controls, requiring comprehensive product‐specific clinical data evaluation. In 2018, the FDA published the integrated CGM (iCGM) criteria permitting interoperability. Applying the iCGM criteria to clinical data provided by manufacturers trading in the UK identified several study protocols that minimized glucose variability, thereby improving CGM accuracy on all metrics. These results do not translate into real‐life performance. Furthermore, for many CGM devices available in the UK, accuracy reported in the hypoglycaemic range is below iCGM standards, or measurement is absent. We offer a framework to evaluate CGM accuracy studies critically. The review concludes that FDA‐ and TGA‐approved indications match the available clinical data, whereas CE marking indications can have discrepancies. The UK can bolster regulation with UK Conformity Assessed marking from January 2025. However, balanced regulation is needed to ensure innovation and timely technological access are not hindered.

[1]  M. Phillip,et al.  Continuous glucose monitoring and metrics for clinical trials: an international consensus statement. , 2022, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[2]  Andreas Thomas,et al.  Diabetes Technology: Many Steps From an Idea to a Product , 2022, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[3]  G. Freckmann,et al.  A statistical approach for assessing the compliance of integrated continuous glucose monitoring systems with FDA accuracy requirements. , 2022, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[4]  G. Freckmann,et al.  Improving the Bias of Comparator Methods in Analytical Performance Assessments Through Recalibration. , 2022, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[5]  C. de Beaufort,et al.  Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice , 2022, Endocrine reviews.

[6]  B. Buckingham,et al.  Safety and Glycemic Outcomes With a Tubeless Automated Insulin Delivery System in Very Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Single-Arm Multicenter Clinical Trial , 2022, Diabetes care.

[7]  T. Bailey,et al.  Accuracy of a Seventh-Generation Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes , 2022, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[8]  S. Garg,et al.  Accuracy and Safety of Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Diabetes , 2022, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[9]  J. Mader,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen® Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study , 2021, Biosensors.

[10]  Sun Joon Moon,et al.  Current Advances of Artificial Pancreas Systems: A Comprehensive Review of the Clinical Evidence , 2021, Diabetes & metabolism journal.

[11]  T. Bailey,et al.  Landscape of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) and Integrated CGM: Accuracy Considerations. , 2021, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[12]  L. Ji,et al.  Multicenter Evaluation Study Comparing a New Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System to Existing Flash Glucose Monitoring System , 2021, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[13]  B. Buckingham,et al.  Multicenter Trial of a Tubeless, On-Body Automated Insulin Delivery System With Customizable Glycemic Targets in Pediatric and Adult Participants With Type 1 Diabetes , 2021, Diabetes Care.

[14]  R. Vigersky,et al.  Improved Glycemic Outcomes With Medtronic MiniMed Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Delivery: Results From a Randomized Crossover Trial Comparing Automated Insulin Delivery With Predictive Low Glucose Suspend in People With Type 1 Diabetes , 2021, Diabetes Care.

[15]  R. Beck,et al.  A comparison of two hybrid closed-loop systems in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes (FLAIR): a multicentre, randomised, crossover trial , 2021, The Lancet.

[16]  D. Klonoff,et al.  Standardization process of continuous glucose monitoring: traceability and performance. , 2020, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[17]  Ellen M Anderson,et al.  A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation of the C-CGM System , 2020, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[18]  Sybil A. McAuley,et al.  Six Months of Hybrid Closed-Loop Versus Manual Insulin Delivery With Fingerprick Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2020, Diabetes Care.

[19]  E. Budiman,et al.  Accuracy of a 14-Day Factory-Calibrated Continuous Glucose Monitoring System With Advanced Algorithm in Pediatric and Adult Population With Diabetes , 2020, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[20]  R. Beck,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  E. Wilmot,et al.  Effect of Flash Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control, Hypoglycemia, Diabetes-Related Distress, and Resource Utilization in the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD) Nationwide Audit , 2020, Diabetes Care.

[22]  T. Danne,et al.  Reduction in Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Severe Hypoglycemia in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes During the First Year of Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Multicenter Analysis of 3,553 Subjects From the DPV Registry , 2020, Diabetes Care.

[23]  L. Heinemann,et al.  Benefits and Limitations of MARD as a Performance Parameter for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Interstitial Space , 2020, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[24]  Eyal Dassau,et al.  Six-Month Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Type 1 Diabetes. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  F. Doyle,et al.  Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range , 2019, Diabetes Care.

[26]  D. Feig,et al.  Modelling potential cost savings from use of real‐time continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with Type 1 diabetes , 2019, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[27]  K. Turksoy,et al.  Lag Time Remains with Newer Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology During Aerobic Exercise in Adults Living with Type 1 Diabetes , 2019, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[28]  David M Maahs,et al.  State of Type 1 Diabetes Management and Outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016-2018. , 2019, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[29]  Janet M. Allen,et al.  Home Use of Day-and-Night Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Very Young Children: A Multicenter, 3-Week, Randomized Trial , 2019, Diabetes Care.

[30]  B. Buckingham,et al.  Safety Evaluation of the MiniMed 670G System in Children 7–13 Years of Age with Type 1 Diabetes , 2019, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[31]  G. Freckmann,et al.  Measures of Accuracy for Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Blood Glucose Monitoring Devices , 2018, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[32]  Janet M. Allen,et al.  Closed-loop insulin delivery in suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, 12-week randomised trial , 2018, The Lancet.

[33]  R. Wadwa,et al.  Performance of a Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Utilizing an Automated Sensor Applicator. , 2018, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[34]  Lori M Laffel,et al.  Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes. , 2018, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[35]  Eyal Dassau,et al.  International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring , 2017, Diabetes Care.

[36]  G. Freckmann,et al.  ISO 15197: 2013 Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System’s Measurement Accuracy , 2017, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[37]  Ronald Brazg,et al.  Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor , 2017, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[38]  Y. Bao,et al.  Performance of a new real‐time continuous glucose monitoring system: A multicenter pilot study , 2017, Journal of diabetes investigation.

[39]  Danielle Hessler,et al.  The Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Markers of Quality of Life in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Further Findings From the DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, Diabetes Care.

[40]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Day-and-night glycaemic control with closed-loop insulin delivery versus conventional insulin pump therapy in free-living adults with well controlled type 1 diabetes: an open-label, randomised, crossover study , 2017, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[41]  J. Edge,et al.  An alternative sensor-based method for glucose monitoring in children and young people with diabetes , 2017, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[42]  Janet M. Allen,et al.  Home Use of Day-and-Night Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Suboptimally Controlled Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A 3-Week, Free-Living, Randomized Crossover Trial , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[43]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Home Use of an Artificial Beta Cell in Type 1 Diabetes. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  T. Bailey,et al.  The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System , 2015, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[45]  T. Battelino,et al.  Routine use of continuous glucose monitoring in 10 501 people with diabetes mellitus , 2015, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[46]  Thira,et al.  International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) , 2007 .

[47]  D. Cox,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of continuous glucose-monitoring sensors: continuous glucose-error grid analysis illustrated by TheraSense Freestyle Navigator data. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[48]  Å. Lernmark,et al.  Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus , 2002, Diabetes Care.

[49]  B H Ginsberg,et al.  A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[50]  D. Cox,et al.  Evaluating Clinical Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose , 1987, Diabetes Care.

[51]  Sergio Sismondo,et al.  Industry sponsorship and research outcome. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[52]  About AusPARs About the Therapeutic Goods Administration ( TGA ) ∑ , 2011 .

[53]  JDRF randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in the management of type 1 diabetes: research design and methods. , 2008, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[54]  A. 510k 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY , 2008 .

[55]  Sofamor Danek,et al.  SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS DATA (SSED) , 2004 .