The Effect of Gender and Attractiveness of Motion on Proximity in Virtual Reality

In human interaction, people will keep different distances from each other depending on their gender. For example, males will stand further away from males and closer to females. Previous studies in virtual reality (VR), where people were interacting with virtual humans, showed a similar result. However, many other variables influence proximity, such as appearance characteristics of the virtual character (e.g., attractiveness). Our study focuses on proximity to virtual walkers, where gender could be recognised from motion only, since previous studies using point-light displays found walking motion is rich in gender cues. In our experiment, a walking wooden mannequin approached the participant embodied in a virtual avatar using the HTC Vive Pro HMD and controllers. The mannequin animation was motion captured from several male and female actors and each motion was displayed individually on the character. Participants used the controller to stop the approaching mannequin when they felt it was uncomfortably close to them. Based on previous work, we hypothesised that proximity will be affected by the gender of the character, but unlike previous research, the gender in our experiment could only be determined from character’s motion. We also expected differences in proximity according to the gender of the participant. We additionally expected some motions to be rated more attractive than others and that attractive motions would reduce the proximity measure. Our results show support for the last two assumptions, but no difference in proximity was found according to the gender of the character’s motion. Our findings have implications for the design of virtual characters in interactive virtual environments.

[1]  N Sekiya,et al.  The invariant relationship between step length and step rate during free walking , 1996 .

[2]  Jay Hewitt,et al.  Sex Differences in Reaction to Spatial Invasion , 1987 .

[3]  Boris M. Velichkovsky,et al.  The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments - A review , 2013, ACM Comput. Surv..

[4]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  Distance Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments, Revisited , 2006, IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR 2006).

[5]  G. Mather,et al.  Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Kerri L. Johnson,et al.  Compatibility of basic social perceptions determines perceived attractiveness , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Tabitha C. Peck,et al.  The Effect of Gender Body-Swap Illusions on Working Memory and Stereotype Threat , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  Ludovic Hoyet,et al.  Exploring the Effect of Motion Type and Emotions on the Perception of Gender in Virtual Humans , 2015, ACM Trans. Appl. Percept..

[9]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[10]  Mel Slater,et al.  Building Expression into Virtual Characters , 2006, Eurographics.

[11]  Yohei Otaka,et al.  Estimated lower speed boundary at which the walk ratio constancy is broken in healthy adults , 2017, Journal of physical therapy science.

[12]  Y. Coello,et al.  Body Space in Social Interactions: A Comparison of Reaching and Comfort Distance in Immersive Virtual Reality , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  George Banziger,et al.  Emotion, Attractiveness, and Interpersonal Space , 1984 .

[14]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Virtual shapers & movers: form and motion affect sex perception , 2007, APGV.

[15]  Carol O'Sullivan,et al.  Perceptually plausible formations for virtual conversers , 2012, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.

[16]  M. Walker,et al.  Interpersonal distance as a function of situationally induced anxiety. , 1978, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.

[17]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Comparing Behavioral and Self-Report Measures of Embodied Agents' Social Presence in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2004 .

[18]  N. Troje,et al.  Sex classification of point-light walkers: Viewpoint, structure, kinematics , 2007 .

[19]  Heiko Hecht,et al.  The shape of personal space. , 2019, Acta psychologica.

[20]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Evaluating the effect of motion and body shape on the perceived sex of virtual characters , 2009, TAP.

[21]  George Banziger,et al.  Attractiveness and Interpersonal Space , 1979 .

[22]  R. Unger Toward a redefinition of sex and gender. , 1979 .

[23]  L. Hayduk Personal space: Where we now stand. , 1983 .

[24]  J. Cutting,et al.  Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  D. Keltner,et al.  The Gender Stereotyping of Emotions , 2000 .

[26]  David R. Thomas Interaction Distances in Same-Sex and Mixed-Sex Groups , 1973 .

[27]  S. M. S. Ahmed Invasion of Personal Space: A Study of Departure Time as Affected by Sex of the Intruder, Sex of the Subject, and Saliency Condition , 1979 .

[28]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  First Person Experience of Body Transfer in Virtual Reality , 2010, PloS one.

[29]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[30]  Betty J. Mohler,et al.  The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments , 2006, APGV '06.

[31]  F. Galante,et al.  Peripersonal and interpersonal space in virtual and real environments: Effects of gender and age , 2016 .

[32]  Christoph Klimmt,et al.  Gender and Computer Games: Exploring Females' Dislikes , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[33]  William Ickes,et al.  The Role of Sex and Self-Monitoring in Unstructured Dyadic Interactions , 1977 .

[34]  Andrea Bönsch,et al.  Social VR: How Personal Space is Affected by Virtual Agents' Emotions , 2018, 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR).

[35]  Danu Anthony Stinson,et al.  Gender (mis)measurement: Guidelines for respecting gender diversity in psychological research , 2019, Social and Personality Psychology Compass.

[36]  Kerri L. Johnson,et al.  Perceiving Sex Directly and Indirectly , 2005, Psychological science.

[37]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  Attractiveness and Confidence in Walking Style of Male and Female Virtual Characters , 2020, 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW).

[38]  J. Loomis,et al.  Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[39]  J. Hodgins,et al.  Anthropomorphism influences perception of computer-animated characters' actions. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[40]  Antony S R Manstead,et al.  Gender and culture differences in emotion. , 2004, Emotion.

[41]  Leslie A. Hayduk,et al.  The permeability of personal space. , 1981 .

[42]  Nasser Nassiri,et al.  Human interactions and personal space in collaborative virtual environments , 2010, Virtual Reality.

[43]  Michael K McBeath,et al.  Gender differences in spatial perception of body tilt , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  Martin V. Butz,et al.  The Influence of Human Body Orientation on Distance Judgments , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[45]  C. Watling,et al.  A Framework for Integrating Implicit Bias Recognition Into Health Professions Education , 2018, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[46]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  The Effect of Viewing a Self-Avatar on Distance Judgments in an HMD-Based Virtual Environment , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[47]  Nikolaus F. Troje Cat walk and western hero - motion is expressive. , 2003 .

[48]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[49]  Michael E Cinelli,et al.  Does the passability of apertures change when walking through human versus pole obstacles? , 2015, Acta psychologica.

[50]  Ludovic Hoyet,et al.  Evaluating the distinctiveness and attractiveness of human motions on realistic virtual bodies , 2013, ACM Trans. Graph..

[51]  Ann Strong Anthony,et al.  Gender Bias and Discrimination in Nursing Education: Can We Change It? , 2004, Nurse educator.

[52]  Gerd Bruder,et al.  Virtual proxemics: Locomotion in the presence of obstacles in large immersive projection environments , 2015, 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[53]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  The effect of self-embodiment on distance perception in immersive virtual environments , 2008, VRST '08.

[54]  Mel Slater,et al.  Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.