Why does electron sharing lead to covalent bonding? A variational analysis

Ground state energy differences between related systems can be elucidated by a comparative variational analysis of the energy functional, in which the concepts of variational kinetic pressure and variational electrostatic potential pull are found useful. This approach is applied to the formation of the bond in the hydrogen molecule ion. A highly accurate wavefunction is shown to be the superposition of two quasiatomic orbitals, each of which consists to 94% of the respective atomic 1s orbital, the remaining 6% deformation being 73% spherical and 27% nonspherical in character. The spherical deformation can be recovered to 99.9% by scaling the 1s orbital. These results quantify the conceptual metamorphosis of the free‐atom wavefunction into the molecular wavefunction by orbital sharing, orbital contraction, and orbital polarization. Starting with the 1s orbital on one atom as the initial trial function, the value of the energy functional of the molecule at the equilibrium distance is stepwise lowered along several sequences of wavefunction modifications, whose energies monotonically decrease to the ground state energy of H  2+ . The contributions of sharing, contraction and polarization to the overall lowering of the energy functional and their kinetic and potential components exhibit a consistent pattern that can be related to the wavefunction changes on the basis of physical reasoning, including the virial theorem. It is found that orbital sharing lowers the variational kinetic energy pressure and that this is the essential cause of covalent bonding in this molecule. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 28: 391‐410, 2007

[1]  Werner Kutzelnigg.  Was ist Chemische Bindung , 1973 .

[2]  B. N. Dickinson.  The Normal State of the Hydrogen Molecule‐Ion , 1933 .

[3]  G. Richards.  Diatomic molecules , 1978, Nature.

[4]  Klaus Ruedenberg,et al.  The Physical Nature of the Chemical Bond , 1962 .

[5]  V. Guillemin,et al.  HYDROGEN-ION WAVE FUNCTION. , 1929, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  G. Frenking,et al.  The nature of the chemical bond revisited: an energy-partitioning analysis of nonpolar bonds. , 2005, Chemistry.

[7]  K. Ruedenberg,et al.  Heteropolar One‐Electron Bond , 1971 .

[8]  G. Schwarz.  Francis K. Fong: Theory of Molecular Relaxation, Applications in Chemistry and Biology, John Wiley and Sons, Baffins Lane 1975, 314 Seiten, Preis: £ 8.25. , 1976 .

[9]  André Julg,et al.  The concept of the chemical bond , 1984 .

[10]  K. Ruedenberg,et al.  Toward a physical understanding of electron‐sharing two‐center bonds. I. General aspects , 2007, Journal of computational chemistry.

[11]  Per-Olov Löwdin,et al.  Scaling problem, virial theorem, and connected relations in quantum mechanics , 1959 .

[12]  Klaus Ruedenberg,et al.  Paradoxical Role of the Kinetic‐Energy Operator in the Formation of the Covalent Bond , 1971 .

[13]  Werner Kutzelnigg,et al.  The Physical Mechanism of the Chemical Bond , 1973 .

[14]  W. Pauli,et al.  Die allgemeinen Prinzipien der Wellenmechanik , 1990 .

[15]  J. Lennard-jones,et al.  Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure , 1929, Nature.

[16]  L. Muñoz,et al.  ”QUANTUM THEORY OF SOLIDS” , 2009 .

[17]  J. C. Slater.  The Virial and Molecular Structure , 1933 .

[18]  E. Baerends,et al.  Kohn-Sham Density Functional Theory: Predicting and Understanding Chemistry , 2007 .

[19]  L. Pauling.  The application of the quantum mechanics to the structure of the hydrogen molecule and hydrogen molecule-ion and to related problems. , 1928 .

[20]  W. Kutzelnigg,et al.  Formation of the chemical bond and orbital contraction , 1982 .

[21]  W. Kutzelnigg.  The ‘‘primitive’’ wave function in the theory of intermolecular interactions , 1980 .

[22]  J. P. Malrieu,et al.  Localization and Delocalization in Quantum Chemistry , 1975 .

[23]  Gilbert N. Lewis,et al.  The Atom and the Molecule , 1916, Resonance.

[24]  F. London,et al.  Wechselwirkung neutraler Atome und homöopolare Bindung nach der Quantenmechanik , 1927 .

[25]  Zur Rolle der kinetischen Elektronenenergie für die zwischenatomaren Kräfte , 1933 .

[26]  Werner Kutzelnigg,et al.  Does the polarization approximation converge for large R to a primitive or a symmetry-adapted wavefunction? , 1992 .

[27]  C Z Wang,et al.  Molecule intrinsic minimal basis sets. I. Exact resolution of ab initio optimized molecular orbitals in terms of deformed atomic minimal-basis orbitals. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[28]  Tony C. Scott,et al.  New approach for the electronic energies of the hydrogen molecular ion , 2006, physics/0607081.

[29]  Frank Jensen,et al.  Polarization consistent basis sets: Principles , 2001 .

[30]  Dieter Cremer,et al.  The Concept of the Chemical Bond , 1990 .

[31]  G. Herzberg.  Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure IV. Constants of Diatomic Molecules , 1939 .

[32]  E. Hylleraas.  Über die Elektronenterme des Wasserstoffmoleküls , 1931 .