SAF values for internal photon emitters calculated for the RPI-P pregnant-female models using Monte Carlo methods.

Estimates of radiation absorbed doses from radionuclides internally deposited in a pregnant woman and her fetus are very important due to elevated fetal radiosensitivity. This paper reports a set of specific absorbed fractions (SAFs) for use with the dosimetry schema developed by the Society of Nuclear Medicine's Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) Committee. The calculations were based on three newly constructed pregnant female anatomic models, called RPI-P3, RPI-P6, and RPI-P9, that represent adult females at 3-, 6-, and 9-month gestational periods, respectively. Advanced Boundary REPresentation (BREP) surface-geometry modeling methods were used to create anatomically realistic geometries and organ volumes that were carefully adjusted to agree with the latest ICRP reference values. A Monte Carlo user code, EGS4-VLSI, was used to simulate internal photon emitters ranging from 10 keV to 4 MeV. SAF values were calculated and compared with previous data derived from stylized models of simplified geometries and with a model of a 7.5-month pregnant female developed previously from partial-body CT images. The results show considerable differences between these models for low energy photons, but generally good agreement at higher energies. These differences are caused mainly by different organ shapes and positions. Other factors, such as the organ mass, the source-to-target-organ centroid distance, and the Monte Carlo code used in each study, played lesser roles in the observed differences in these. Since the SAF values reported in this study are based on models that are anatomically more realistic than previous models, these data are recommended for future applications as standard reference values in internal dosimetry involving pregnant females.

[1]  R. Sparks,et al.  Radiation absorbed dose to the embryo/fetus from radiopharmaceuticals. , 1997, Health physics.

[2]  A. Preece,et al.  Model-based comparison of maternal and foetal organ doses from 99mTc pertechnetate, DMSA, DTPA, HDP, MAA and MAG3 diagnostic intakes during pregnancy , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  X. Xu,et al.  Specific absorbed fractions from the image-based VIP-Man body model and EGS4-VLSI Monte Carlo code: internal electron emitters. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Les A. Piegl,et al.  On NURBS: A Survey , 2004 .

[5]  Keith F. Eckerman,et al.  Mathematical models and specific absorbed fractions of photon energy in the nonpregnant adult female and at the end of each trimester of pregnancy , 1995 .

[6]  A. Bozkurt,et al.  VIP-MAN: AN IMAGE-BASED WHOLE-BODY ADULT MALE MODEL CONSTRUCTED FROM COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE VISIBLE HUMAN PROJECT FOR MULTI-PARTICLE MONTE CARLO CALCULATIONS , 2000, Health physics.

[7]  W. S. Snyder,et al.  Estimates of absorbed fractions for monoenergetic photon sources uniformly distributed in various organs of a heterogeneous phantom. , 1974, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  P. Mountford Risk assessment of the nuclear medicine patient. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  M. Podgorsak,et al.  Technical management of a pregnant patient undergoing radiation therapy to the head and neck. , 1999, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[10]  Chengyu Shi,et al.  A boundary-representation method for designing whole-body radiation dosimetry models: pregnant females at the ends of three gestational periods—RPI-P3, -P6 and -P9 , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  P. Dimbylow,et al.  Development of pregnant female, hybrid voxel-mathematical models and their application to the dosimetry of applied magnetic and electric fields at 50 Hz , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  N Leitgeb,et al.  Fetal exposure to low frequency electric and magnetic fields , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  K. F. Eckerman,et al.  Specific absorbed fractions of energy at various ages from internal photon sources: 6, Newborn , 1987 .

[14]  Jing Chen,et al.  MATHEMATICAL MODELS OF THE EMBRYO AND FETUS FOR USE IN RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION , 2004, Health physics.

[15]  W. Kainz,et al.  Calculation of induced current densities and specific absorption rates (SAR) for pregnant women exposed to hand-held metal detectors. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Chengyu Shi,et al.  Development of a 30-week-pregnant female tomographic model from computed tomography (CT) images for Monte Carlo organ dose calculations. , 2004, Medical physics.

[17]  Michael G Stabin,et al.  OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  Equivalent dose to the fetus from occupational exposure of pregnant staff in diagnostic radiology. , 2001, British Journal of Radiology.

[19]  Michael G Stabin,et al.  Uncertainties in Internal Dose Calculations for Radiopharmaceuticals , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  X. Xu,et al.  SPECIFIC ABSORBED FRACTIONS FOR INTERNAL PHOTON EMITTERS CALCULATED FOR A TOMOGRAPHIC MODEL OF A PREGNANT WOMAN , 2004, Health physics.

[21]  D. Manocha,et al.  Development and application of the new dynamic Nurbs-based Cardiac-Torso (NCAT) phantom. , 2001 .

[22]  Koichi Ogawa,et al.  Simple Modeling of an Abdomen of Pregnant Women and Its Application to SAR Estimation , 2006, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[23]  Doses and risks from the ingestion of Dounreay fuel fragments. , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.