Why language acquisition is a snap

Abstract Nativists inspired by Chomsky are apt to provide arguments with the following general form: languages exhibit interesting generalizations that are not suggested by casual (or even intensive) examination of what people actually say; correspondingly, adults (i.e., just about anyone above the age of four) know much more about language than they could plausibly have learned on the basis of their experience; so absent an alternative account of the relevant generalizations and speakers' (tacit) knowledge of them, one should conclude that there are substantive “universal” principles of human grammar and, as a result of human biology, children can only acquire languages that conform to these principles. According to Pullum and Scholz, linguists need not suppose that children are innately endowed with “specific contingent facts about natural languages.” But Pullum and Scholz don't consider the kinds of facts that really impress nativists. Nor do they offer any plausible acquisition scenarios that would culminate in the acquisition of languages that exhibit the kinds of rich and interrelated generalizations that are exhibited by natural languages. As we stress, good poverty-of-stimulus arguments are based on specific principles – confirmed by drawing on (negative and crosslinguistic) data unavailable to children – that help explain a range of independently established linguistic phenomena. If subsequent psycholinguistic experiments show that very young children already know such principles, that strengthens the case for nativism; and if further investigation shows that children sometimes “try out” constructions that are unattested in the local language, but only if such constructions are attested in other human languages, then the case for nativism is made stronger still. We illustrate these points by considering an apparently disparate – but upon closer inspection, interestingly related – cluster of phenomena involving: negative polarity items, the interpretation of ‘or’, binding theory, and displays of Romance and Germanic constructions in Child-English.

[1]  C. L. Baker,et al.  The Logical problem of language acquisition , 1984 .

[2]  Samuel David Epstein,et al.  A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations , 1998 .

[3]  M. Braine,et al.  Development of comprehension of “or”: Evidence for a sequence of competencies☆ , 1981 .

[4]  I. Laka Negation in syntax--on the nature of functional categories and projections , 1990 .

[5]  Dana McDaniel,et al.  Conditions on wh-chains , 1986 .

[6]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  Negation and polarity : syntactic and semantic perspectives , 2000 .

[7]  S. Crain Investigations In Universal Grammar , 1998 .

[8]  L. Rizzi The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[9]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  Explanation in Linguistics: The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition , 1982 .

[10]  Ljiljana Progovac,et al.  Negative and Positive Polarity: A Binding Approach , 1994 .

[11]  R. Thornton,et al.  Adventures in long-distance moving: The acquisition of complex Wh-questions , 1990 .

[12]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[13]  Paul M. Pietroski,et al.  Nature, Nurture And Universal Grammar , 2001 .

[14]  Dana McDaniel,et al.  Methods for assessing children's syntax , 2000 .

[15]  Stephen Crain,et al.  Navigating negative quantificational space , 2000 .

[16]  S. Crain,et al.  The Acquisition of Logical Words , 2000 .

[17]  Laurence R. Horn A Natural History of Negation , 1989 .

[18]  M. Tomasello Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , 2000, Cognition.

[19]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  Linguistics: An Introduction to Linguistic Theory , 2001 .

[20]  Rosalind Thornton,et al.  Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics , 1998 .

[21]  S. Crain Language acquisition in the absence of experience , 1991, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[22]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Elements of Grammar: Handbook In Generative Syntax , 1998 .

[23]  David Lightfoot,et al.  How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change , 1991 .

[24]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[25]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .