Foot preference across the lifespan: Effects of target location and task complexity

This study was designed to determine the factor(s) that influence the choice of the foot throughout the lifespan. To achieve this purpose, 86 right-footed participants (young children (5– 8), adolescents (10–14), young adults (18–25) and older adults (over 50) were tested on two tasks of different levels of difficulty, performed in three spatial locations (left, right, and midline) according to two levels of body posture: sitting and standing. Results revealed that the participants favored their preferred foot when the object was located in the ipsilateral hemispace and at the midline. They selected their non-preferred foot when the object was located in the contralateral hemispace. The participants used their preferred foot to a greater extent during the most complex task than during the easiest one and more often while standing rather than sitting. Finally, we have found a significant age effect. Young children often used the preferred foot more frequently than the other age groups. In conclusion, the findings of this study suggest that foot selection depends on task demand, environmental constraints, and a biological factor associated with motor dominance.

[1]  Ralf F A Cox,et al.  Action‐selection perseveration in young children: Advances of a dynamic model , 2018, Developmental psychobiology.

[2]  L. A. Teixeira,et al.  Footedness across ages: Distinction between mobilization and stabilization tasks , 2015, Laterality.

[3]  P. Bryden,et al.  Hand preference, performance abilities, and hand selection in children , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[4]  L. A. Teixeira,et al.  Leg Preference and Interlateral Asymmetry of Balance Stability in Soccer Players , 2011, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[5]  Vassilia Hatzitaki,et al.  Investigating the stabilising and mobilising features of footedness , 2009, Laterality.

[6]  L. A. Teixeira,et al.  Leg preference and interlateral performance asymmetry in soccer player children. , 2008, Developmental psychobiology.

[7]  E. Nalçaci,et al.  Aspects of foot preference: Differential relationships of skilled and unskilled foot movements with motor asymmetry , 2008, Laterality.

[8]  P. Bryden,et al.  Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children. , 2006, Developmental psychobiology.

[9]  J. Fagard,et al.  Which factors affect hand selection in children’s grasping in hemispace? Combined effects of task demand and motor dominance , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  Jacqueline Fagard,et al.  Influence of object spatial location and task complexity on children's use of their preferred hand depending on their handedness consistency. , 2004, Developmental psychobiology.

[11]  C. Gabbard,et al.  What Determines Limb Selection for Reaching? , 2004, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[12]  C. Gabbard,et al.  What drives children’s limb selection for reaching in hemispace? , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Carl Gabbard,et al.  TASK COMPLEXITY AND LIMB SELECTION IN REACHING , 2003, The International journal of neuroscience.

[14]  M. Dittmar.  Functional and Postural Lateral Preferences in Humans: Interrelations and Life-Span Age Differences , 2002, Human biology.

[15]  C. Gabbard,et al.  Imagined and actual limb selection: A test of preference , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[16]  Eric A. Roy,et al.  A Performance Measure of the Degree of Hand Preference , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[17]  L. Harris,et al.  Handedness and footedness in Korean college students. , 2000, Brain and cognition.

[18]  C. Gabbard,et al.  What Determines Choice of Limb for Unimanual Reaching Movements? , 2000, The Journal of general psychology.

[19]  J. Bell,et al.  Foot Preference Changes Through Adulthood , 2000, Laterality.

[20]  C. Gabbard,et al.  Attentional stimuli and programming hand selection: a developmental perspective. , 1998, The International journal of neuroscience.

[21]  G. Calvert,et al.  Quantifying hand preference using a behavioural continuum. , 1998, Laterality.

[22]  C. Gabbard,et al.  Examining the Mobilizing Feature of Footedness , 1998, Perceptual and motor skills.

[23]  L. Elias,et al.  Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  L S Mark,et al.  Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  C. Gabbard,et al.  A question of foot dominance. , 1996, The Journal of general psychology.

[26]  C. Gabbard,et al.  Foot Performance of Right- and Left-Handers: A Question of Environmental Influence , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  C. Gabbard,et al.  Foot laterality during childhood: a review. , 1993, The International journal of neuroscience.

[28]  Mounir Mesbah,et al.  Foot and Eye Preferences in Adults: Relationship with Handedness, Sex and Age , 1992, Cortex.

[29]  F H Previc,et al.  A general theory concerning the prenatal origins of cerebral lateralization in humans. , 1991, Psychological review.

[30]  M. Peters,et al.  Neuropsychological identification of motor problems: Can we learn something from the feet and legs that hands and arms will not tell us? , 1990, Neuropsychology Review.

[31]  M. Peters,et al.  Footedness: asymmetries in foot preference and skill and neuropsychological assessment of foot movement. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  J. Whittington,et al.  THE STABILITY OF CHILDREN'S LATERALITY PREVALENCES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE , 1987 .

[33]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  L. Elias,et al.  Footedness is a better predictor of language lateralisation than handedness. , 1998, Laterality.

[35]  C. Gabbard,et al.  A lateralized comparison of handedness and object proximity. , 1997, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[36]  E. Roy,et al.  On the genetics and measurement of human handedness. , 1997, Laterality.

[37]  C. Gabbard,et al.  Examining the stabilising characteristics of footedness. , 1997, Laterality.

[38]  C. Gabbard,et al.  Brief communication: bilateral footedness and task complexity. , 1996, The International journal of neuroscience.

[39]  C. Gabbard,et al.  Foot laterality in children, adolescents, and adults. , 1996, Laterality.

[40]  C. Gabbard,et al.  Foot-preference behavior: a developmental perspective. , 1995, The Journal of general psychology.

[41]  S. Coren.  The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: Norms for young adults , 1993 .

[42]  P. Jallon,et al.  Mesure de la préférence manuelle par autoquestionnaire dans la population française adulte , 1988 .

[43]  S. Coren,et al.  Lateral preferences and human behavior , 1981 .