Approximate interval estimation of the ratio of binomial parameters: a review and corrections for skewness.

Various methods for finding confidence intervals for the ratio of binomial parameters are reviewed and evaluated numerically. It is found that the method based on likelihood scores (Koopman, 1984, Biometrics 40, 513-517; Miettinen and Nurminen, 1985, Statistics in Medicine 4, 213-226) performs best in achieving the nominal confidence coefficient, but it may distribute the tail probabilities quite disparately. Using general theory of Bartlett (1953, Biometrika 40, 306-317; 1955, Biometrika 42, 201-203), we correct this method for asymptotic skewness. Following Gart (1985, Biometrika 72, 673-677), we extend this correction to the case of estimating the common ratio in a series of two-by-two tables. Computing algorithms are given and applied to numerical examples. Parallel methods for the odds ratio and the ratio of Poisson parameters are noted.

[1]  D G Thomas,et al.  The performance of three approximate confidence limit methods for the odds ratio. , 1982, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  Gottfried E. Noether,et al.  Two Confidence Intervals for the Ratio of Two Probabilities and Some Measures of Effectiveness , 1957 .

[3]  J. Gart.  The analysis of ratios and cross-product ratios of poisson variates with application to incidence rates , 1978 .

[4]  S. Walter.  The distribution of Levin's measure of attributable risk , 1975 .

[5]  R. Tarone,et al.  On summary estimators of relative risk. , 1981, Journal of chronic diseases.

[6]  S P Azen,et al.  OBTAINING CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE RISK RATIO IN COHORT STUDIES , 1978 .

[7]  Mark Bartlett,et al.  Approximate confidence intervals. III. A bias correction , 1955 .

[8]  Timothy R. C. Read,et al.  Multinomial goodness-of-fit tests , 1984 .

[9]  Homogeneity score tests with nuisance parameters , 1988 .

[10]  M Nurminen,et al.  Comparative analysis of two rates. , 1985, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  E J Bedrick,et al.  A family of confidence intervals for the ratio of two binomial proportions. , 1987, Biometrics.

[12]  Walter W. Hauck,et al.  On the asymptotic inefficiency of certain noniterative estimators of a common relative risk or odds ratio , 1983 .

[13]  J. Gart.  Approximate tests and interval estimation of the common relative risk in the combination of 2×2 tables , 1985 .

[14]  W. G. Cochran.  Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests , 1954 .

[15]  J. Gart,et al.  A Table of Exact Confidence Limits for Differences and Ratios of Two Proportions and Their Odds Ratios , 1977 .

[16]  S. Walter.  The estimation and interpretation of attributable risk in health research. , 1976, Biometrics.

[17]  M. Bartlett,et al.  APPROXIMATE CONFIDENCE INTERVALS , 1953 .

[18]  John J. Gart,et al.  The bias and higher cumulants of the logarithm of a binomial variate , 1986 .

[19]  S. Radhakrishna,et al.  Combination of results from several 2 X 2 contingency tables , 1965 .

[20]  B. Bailey,et al.  Confidence limits to the risk ratio. , 1987, Biometrics.