A cautionary note on the use of hypervolume kernel density estimators in ecological niche modelling

Blonder et al. (2014, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23, 595–609) introduced a new multivariate kernel density estimation (KDE) method to infer Hutchinsonian hypervolumes in the modelling of ecological niches. The authors argued that their KDE method matches or outperforms several methods for estimating hypervolume geometries and for conducting species distribution modelling. Further clarification, however, is appropriate with respect to the assumptions and limitations of KDE as a method for species distribution modelling. Using virtual species and controlled environmental scenarios, we show that KDE both under- and overestimates niche volumes depending on the dimensionality of the dataset and the number of occurrence records considered. We suggest that KDE may be a viable approach when dealing with large sample sizes, limited sampling bias and only a few environmental dimensions.

[1]  W. Godsoe.  Inferring the similarity of species distributions using Species’ Distribution Models , 2014 .

[2]  M. Austin,et al.  New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures , 1984 .

[3]  B. Silverman.  Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[4]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications , 2015 .

[5]  J. Drake.  Range bagging: a new method for ecological niche modelling from presence-only data , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[6]  James H. Brown.  On the Relationship between Abundance and Distribution of Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[7]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  Correlation between genetic diversity and environmental suitability: taking uncertainty from ecological niche models into account , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[8]  P. Jaccard.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FLORA IN THE ALPINE ZONE.1 , 1912 .

[9]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[10]  William Godsoe,et al.  I can't define the niche but I know it when I see it: a formal link between statistical theory and the ecological niche , 2010 .

[11]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions , 2011 .

[12]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Hutchinson's duality: The once and future niche , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  J. Franklin,et al.  The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction , 2005 .

[14]  Bassett Maguire,,et al.  Niche Response Structure and the Analytical Potentials of Its Relationship to the Habitat , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[15]  B. Enquist,et al.  The n‐dimensional hypervolume , 2014 .

[16]  G. Hutchinson,et al.  An Introduction to Population Ecology , 1978 .

[17]  M. Araújo,et al.  Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling. , 2012, Ecology.

[18]  C. Stern.  CONCLUDING REMARKS OF THE CHAIRMAN , 1950 .

[19]  L. Birch,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY OF THE DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF INSECTS: III. The relation between innate capacity for increase and survival of different species of beetles living together on the same food , 1953 .

[20]  A. Peterson,et al.  No silver bullets in correlative ecological niche modelling: insights from testing among many potential algorithms for niche estimation , 2015 .

[21]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.