Multidisciplinary Sport Science Teams in Elite Sport: Comprehensive Servicing or Conflict and Confusion?

Elite sport is following in the footsteps of other human service industries with the flurried development of multidisciplinary support teams. It is increasingly common for elite level teams to have several assistant coaches, team doctors (and medical specialist network), physiotherapists, physiologists, rehabilitation trainers, psychologists, and even more recently ACE (Athlete Career and Education) officers. While the potential for comprehensive athlete servicing is obvious, the potential for working at cross-purposes has also become apparent. This paper will reflect on the authors' experiences of developing multidisciplinary sport science teams at the elite sporting level. Systems Theory is used as a framework for considering some of the pitfalls and challenges that confront "off-field teams" in facilitating excellence in sporting performance.

[1]  Michael G. Aamodt.  Applied Industrial/Organizational Psychology , 1995 .

[2]  Primary health care teams re-engineered , 1998 .

[3]  C. Kell.  Confidentiality and the counsellor in general practice , 1999 .

[4]  L. Berg-Cross.  Basic concepts in family therapy : an introductory text , 1987 .

[5]  P. Lacey.  Interdisciplinary training for staff working with people with profound and multiple learning disabilities , 1998 .

[6]  P. Corrigan,et al.  Building teams and programs for effective psychiatric rehabilitation , 1998 .

[7]  Training professionals for rehabilitation teams. , 1998, New directions for mental health services.

[8]  S. Dobson,et al.  Problem solving in small multidisciplinary teams: a means of improving the quality of the communication environment for people with profound learning disability , 2000 .

[9]  R. Albin,et al.  Essential Elements of Inservice Training in Positive Behavior Support , 2000 .

[10]  W. Widmeyer,et al.  The Influence of the Group and Its Cohesiveness on Perceptions of Group Goal-Related Variables , 1993 .

[11]  H. Rutenberg.  Group processes. , 1974, Hospital progress.

[12]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Group Cohesiveness and Quality of Decision Making , 1994 .

[13]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Counselors + Educators + Families as a Transdisciplinary Team = More Effective Inclusion for Students with Disabilities. , 1998 .

[14]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[15]  M. Worden.  Family Therapy Basics , 1996 .

[16]  L Bell,et al.  Patterns of interactions in multidisciplinary child protection teams in New Jersey. , 2001, Child abuse & neglect.

[17]  H. McConachie,et al.  How do Child Development Teams work? Findings from a UK national survey. , 1999, Child: care, health and development.