Fluctuating epistemic uncertainty in a design team as a metacognitive driver for creative cognitive processes

Abstract Previous design research has demonstrated how epistemic uncertainty engenders localised, creative reasoning, including analogising and mental simulation. We analysed not just the short-term, localised effects of epistemic uncertainty on creative processing and information selection, but also its long-term impact on downstream creative processes. Our hypothesis was that heightened levels of uncertainty associated with a particular cognitive referent would engender: (1) immediate creative elaboration of that referent aimed at resolving uncertainty and determining information selection; and (2) subsequent attentive returns to that cognitive referent at later points in time, aimed at resolving lingering uncertainty and determining information selection. Findings: First—contrary to expectations—we observed that increased epistemic certainty (rather than increased epistemic uncertainty) in relation to cognitive referents triggered immediate, creative reasoning and information elaboration. Second, epistemic uncertainty was, as predicted, found to engender subsequent attentive returns to cognitive referents. Third, although epistemic uncertainty did not predict the selection of information, both immediate creative elaboration and subsequent attentive returns did predict information selection, with subsequent attentive returns being the stronger predictor. Our findings hold promise for identifying more global impacts of epistemic uncertainty on creative design cognition possibly mediated through the establishment of lasting associations with cognitive referents.

[1]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  How Do Engineering Scientists Think? Model-Based Simulation in Biomedical Engineering Research Laboratories , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Valerie A. Thompson,et al.  Intuition, reason, and metacognition , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  Analysing Design Thinking: Studies of Cross-Cultural Co-Creation , 2017 .

[4]  Stuart G. Shanker,et al.  The nature of insight , 1995, Minds and Machines.

[5]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  Spontaneous Access and Analogical Incubation Effects , 2005 .

[6]  Monica W. Tracey,et al.  Uncertainty, Reflection, and Designer Identity Development , 2016 .

[7]  Janet McDonnell Gifts to the Future: Design Reasoning, Design Research, and Critical Design Practitioners , 2016 .

[8]  Susannah B. F. Paletz,et al.  Psychological factors surrounding disagreement in multicultural design team meetings , 2018 .

[9]  Robin Adams,et al.  Problem Structuring as Co-Inquiry , 2017 .

[10]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking , 2013, Cognition.

[11]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  Meta-reasoning: What can we learn from meta-memory? , 2014 .

[12]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[13]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing , 1992 .

[14]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[15]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[16]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature , 2008 .

[18]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  Susan Bell Trickett,et al.  "I Don't Know What's Going on There": The Use of Spatial Transformations to Deal With and Resolve Uncertainty in Complex Visualizations , 2007 .

[20]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1996 .

[21]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Analogy as a strategy for supporting complex problem solving under uncertainty , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[22]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Studying Design Cognition in the Real World Using the 'In Vivo' Methodology , 2014 .

[23]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Grouping notes through nodes: The functions of Post-It notes in design team cognition , 2018, Design Studies.

[24]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[25]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Analogical Reasoning and Mental Simulation in Design: Two Strategies Linked to Uncertainty Resolution , 2009 .

[26]  D. Houghton Historical Analogies and the Cognitive Dimension of Domestic Policymaking , 1998 .

[27]  Jochim Hansen,et al.  Relative Processing Fluency , 2015 .

[28]  D. Newton,et al.  “Comfy” Cars for the “Awesomely Humble”: Exploring Slang and Jargons in a Cross-Cultural Design Process , 2017 .

[29]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  Inside the DTRS11 Dataset: Background, Content, and Methodological Choices , 2017 .

[30]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Ut Na Sio,et al.  Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  K. Lewin,et al.  Untersuchungen zur Handlungs- und Affektpsychologie , 1927 .

[33]  Gülden Ülkümen,et al.  Two dimensions of subjective uncertainty: Clues from natural language. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The role and impact of mental simulation in design , 2009 .

[35]  K. Gilhooly Incubation, problem solving and creativity , 2017 .

[36]  K. Dunbar How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. , 1997 .

[37]  Jack Sidnell,et al.  Introduction: Multimodal interaction , 2005 .

[38]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Thinking in design teams - an analysis of team communication , 2002 .

[39]  Jose Antonio Diego-Mas,et al.  An exploratory study on the use of digital sculpting in conceptual product design , 2013 .

[40]  K. Dunbar HOW SCIENTISTS REALLY REASON: SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN REAL-WORLD LABORATORIES , 1995 .

[41]  Reza Beheshti,et al.  Design decisions and uncertainty , 1993 .

[42]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  Collaborative problem–solution co-evolution in creative design , 2013 .

[43]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Design requirements, epistemic uncertainty and solution development strategies in software design , 2010 .

[44]  Colleen Seifert,et al.  Demystification of Cognitive Insight : Opportunistic Assimilation and the Prepared-Mind Perspective , 1995 .

[45]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[46]  B. Zeigarnik Das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen , 1927 .

[47]  D E Meyer,et al.  Activation and metacognition of inaccessible stored information: potential bases for incubation effects in problem solving. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.