Fluctuating epistemic uncertainty in a design team as a metacognitive driver for creative cognitive processes
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Nancy J. Nersessian,et al. How Do Engineering Scientists Think? Model-Based Simulation in Biomedical Engineering Research Laboratories , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[2] Valerie A. Thompson,et al. Intuition, reason, and metacognition , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.
[3] Bo T. Christensen,et al. Analysing Design Thinking: Studies of Cross-Cultural Co-Creation , 2017 .
[4] Stuart G. Shanker,et al. The nature of insight , 1995, Minds and Machines.
[5] Bo T. Christensen,et al. Spontaneous Access and Analogical Incubation Effects , 2005 .
[6] Monica W. Tracey,et al. Uncertainty, Reflection, and Designer Identity Development , 2016 .
[7] Janet McDonnell. Gifts to the Future: Design Reasoning, Design Research, and Critical Design Practitioners , 2016 .
[8] Susannah B. F. Paletz,et al. Psychological factors surrounding disagreement in multicultural design team meetings , 2018 .
[9] Robin Adams,et al. Problem Structuring as Co-Inquiry , 2017 .
[10] Rakefet Ackerman,et al. The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking , 2013, Cognition.
[11] Rakefet Ackerman,et al. Meta-reasoning: What can we learn from meta-memory? , 2014 .
[12] K. A. Ericsson,et al. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .
[13] Donald A. Schön,et al. Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing , 1992 .
[14] R. J. Bogumil,et al. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[15] Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al. Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
[16] Bo T. Christensen,et al. The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design , 2007, Memory & cognition.
[17] Thomas J. Howard,et al. Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature , 2008 .
[18] Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al. Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[19] Susan Bell Trickett,et al. "I Don't Know What's Going on There": The Use of Spatial Transformations to Deal With and Resolve Uncertainty in Complex Visualizations , 2007 .
[20] Steven M. Smith,et al. Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1996 .
[21] Christian D. Schunn,et al. Analogy as a strategy for supporting complex problem solving under uncertainty , 2012, Memory & cognition.
[22] Linden J. Ball,et al. Studying Design Cognition in the Real World Using the 'In Vivo' Methodology , 2014 .
[23] Kim Halskov,et al. Grouping notes through nodes: The functions of Post-It notes in design team cognition , 2018, Design Studies.
[24] Nigel Cross,et al. Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .
[25] Linden J. Ball,et al. Analogical Reasoning and Mental Simulation in Design: Two Strategies Linked to Uncertainty Resolution , 2009 .
[26] D. Houghton. Historical Analogies and the Cognitive Dimension of Domestic Policymaking , 1998 .
[27] Jochim Hansen,et al. Relative Processing Fluency , 2015 .
[28] D. Newton,et al. “Comfy” Cars for the “Awesomely Humble”: Exploring Slang and Jargons in a Cross-Cultural Design Process , 2017 .
[29] Bo T. Christensen,et al. Inside the DTRS11 Dataset: Background, Content, and Methodological Choices , 2017 .
[30] D. A. Kenny,et al. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[31] Ut Na Sio,et al. Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.
[32] K. Lewin,et al. Untersuchungen zur Handlungs- und Affektpsychologie , 1927 .
[33] Gülden Ülkümen,et al. Two dimensions of subjective uncertainty: Clues from natural language. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[34] Bo T. Christensen,et al. The role and impact of mental simulation in design , 2009 .
[35] K. Gilhooly. Incubation, problem solving and creativity , 2017 .
[36] K. Dunbar. How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. , 1997 .
[37] Jack Sidnell,et al. Introduction: Multimodal interaction , 2005 .
[38] Petra Badke-Schaub,et al. Thinking in design teams - an analysis of team communication , 2002 .
[39] Jose Antonio Diego-Mas,et al. An exploratory study on the use of digital sculpting in conceptual product design , 2013 .
[40] K. Dunbar. HOW SCIENTISTS REALLY REASON: SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN REAL-WORLD LABORATORIES , 1995 .
[41] Reza Beheshti,et al. Design decisions and uncertainty , 1993 .
[42] Bo T. Christensen,et al. Collaborative problem–solution co-evolution in creative design , 2013 .
[43] Linden J. Ball,et al. Design requirements, epistemic uncertainty and solution development strategies in software design , 2010 .
[44] Colleen Seifert,et al. Demystification of Cognitive Insight : Opportunistic Assimilation and the Prepared-Mind Perspective , 1995 .
[45] D. Schoen,et al. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .
[46] B. Zeigarnik. Das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen , 1927 .
[47] D E Meyer,et al. Activation and metacognition of inaccessible stored information: potential bases for incubation effects in problem solving. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.