DELIVERING THE TUBE TO THE TARGET : GETTING AROUND THE CURVATURE OF THE TONGUE TO THE GLOTTIC OPENING

Intubation research on both direct laryngoscopy and alternative intubation devices has focused on laryngeal exposure and not the mechanics of actual endotracheal tube delivery or insertion. Although there are subtleties to tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy, the path of tube insertion and the direct line of sight are relatively congruent. With alternative intubation devices, this is not the case. Video or optical elements in alternative intubation devices permit looking around the curve of the tongue, without a direct line of sight to the glottic opening. With these devices, laryngeal exposure is generally the simple part of the procedure, and conversely, tube delivery to the glottic opening and advancement into the trachea are sometimes not straightforward. This article presents the mechanical and optical complexities of endotracheal tube insertion in both direct laryngoscopy and alternative devices. An understanding of these complexities is critical to facilitate rapid tracheal intubation and to minimize unsuccessful attempts. [Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57:240-247.]

[1]  R. Walls,et al.  A new maneuver for endotracheal tube insertion during difficult GlideScope intubation. , 2010, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[2]  Ruben A. Lee,et al.  A Comparison of Three Videolaryngoscopes: The Macintosh Laryngoscope Blade Reduces, but Does Not Replace, Routine Stylet Use for Intubation in Morbidly Obese Patients , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  D. Ball,et al.  Palatal perforation associated with McGrath® videolaryngoscope , 2009, Anaesthesia.

[4]  W. Brampton,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists. , 2009, British journal of anaesthesia.

[5]  R. Amathieu,et al.  Optimising tracheal intubation success rate using the Airtraq laryngoscope , 2009, Anaesthesia.

[6]  K. Greenland,et al.  Differences in two new rigid indirect laryngoscopes , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[7]  L. Pott,et al.  Endotracheal tube as a guide for an Eschmann gum elastic bougie to aid tracheal intubation using the McGrath or GlideScope videolaryngoscopes. , 2008, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[8]  T. Kunisawa,et al.  Pentax-AWS (Airway Scope) and Airtraq: big difference between two similar devices , 2008, Journal of Anesthesia.

[9]  D. Parsons,et al.  ‘Reverse loading’ to facilitate Glidescope® intubation , 2007, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[10]  R. Cooper Complications associated with the use of the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope , 2007, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[11]  R. Levitan,et al.  Stylet bend angles and tracheal tube passage using a straight-to-cuff shape. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[12]  Stephen O. Bader,et al.  Tracheal intubation with the glidesSope® videolaryngoscope, using a “J” shaped endotracheal tube , 2006, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[13]  J. W. Heitz,et al.  The use of a gum elastic bougie in combination with a videolaryngoscope. , 2005, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[14]  S. McCluskey,et al.  Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope®) in 728 patients , 2005, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.