Robustness and precision of an automatic marker detection algorithm for online prostate daily targeting using a standard V-EPID.

An algorithm for the daily localization of the prostate using implanted markers and a standard video-based electronic portal imaging device (V-EPID) has been tested. Prior to planning, three gold markers were implanted in the prostate of seven patients. The clinical images were acquired with a BeamViewPlus 2.1 V-EPID for each field during the normal course radiotherapy treatment and are used off-line to determine the ability of the automatic marker detection algorithm to adequately and consistently detect the markers. Clinical images were obtained with various dose levels from ranging 2.5 to 75 MU. The algorithm is based on marker attenuation characterization in the portal image and spatial distribution. A total of 1182 clinical images were taken. The results show an average efficiency of 93% for the markers detected individually and 85% for the group of markers. This algorithm accomplishes the detection and validation in 0.20-0.40 s. When the center of mass of the group of implanted markers is used, then all displacements can be corrected to within 1.0 mm in 84% of the cases and within 1.5 mm in 97% of cases. The standard video-based EPID tested provides excellent marker detection capability even with low dose levels. The V-EPID can be used successfully with radiopaque markers and the automatic detection algorithm to track and correct the daily setup deviations due to organ motions.

[1]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Daily CT localization for correcting portal errors in the treatment of prostate cancer. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  D L McShan,et al.  Automated determination of patient setup errors in radiation therapy using spherical radio-opaque markers. , 1993, Medical physics.

[3]  K Lam,et al.  Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Evaluation of changes in the size and location of the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum during a course of external beam radiation therapy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  J. Crook,et al.  Prostate motion during standard radiotherapy as assessed by fiducial markers. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  K. Langen,et al.  Organ motion and its management. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  M van Herk,et al.  3-D portal image analysis in clinical practice: an evaluation of 2-D and 3-D analysis techniques as applied to 30 prostate cancer patients. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  John D. Austin,et al.  Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations , 1987 .

[9]  Jean Pouliot,et al.  (Non)-migration of radiopaque markers used for on-line localization of the prostate with an electronic portal imaging device. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  S L Schoeppel,et al.  Treatment planning issues related to prostate movement in response to differential filling of the rectum and bladder. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Randall K Ten Haken,et al.  Daily prostate targeting using implanted radiopaque markers. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  P. Munro,et al.  Clinical use of electronic portal imaging: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 58. , 2001, Medical physics.

[13]  S Shalev,et al.  A quality control test for electronic portal imaging devices. , 1996, Medical physics.

[14]  H Alasti,et al.  Portal imaging for evaluation of daily on-line setup errors and off-line organ motion during conformal irradiation of carcinoma of the prostate. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  K L Lam,et al.  Automated localization of the prostate at the time of treatment using implanted radiopaque markers: technical feasibility. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  P Hofman,et al.  Feasibility of automatic marker detection with an a-Si flat-panel imager. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  B Pickett,et al.  Forward or inversely planned segmental multileaf collimator IMRT and sequential tomotherapy to treat multiple dominant intraprostatic lesions of prostate cancer to 90 Gy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  Measurements and clinical consequences of prostate motion during a radiotherapy fraction. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  H M Sandler,et al.  Localization of the prostatic apex for radiation therapy using implanted markers. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  P Hofman,et al.  Detection of fiducial gold markers for automatic on-line megavoltage position verification using a marker extraction kernel (MEK). , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  J Pouliot,et al.  Electronic portal imaging device detection of radioopaque markers for the evaluation of prostate position during megavoltage irradiation: a clinical study. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  A comparison of daily CT localization to a daily ultrasound-based system in prostate cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  R K Ten Haken,et al.  The effect of patient position and treatment technique in conformal treatment of prostate cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.