Estimating prehistoric earthquake magnitude from point measurements of surface rupture

Abstract We have developed a method for estimating the magnitude of prehistoric earthquakes using displacement data that usually can be collected from paleoseismic investigations. This method is necessary because essentially all current magnitude estimates for prehistoric events rely on determining the total length of coseismic surface rupture, which is rarely measurable, or rely on segmentation scenarios, for which uncertainties cannot be quantified. Although surface rupture length is a better predictor of magnitude than displacement for historic earthquakes, paleoseismic investigations are better at providing measurements of the amount of displacement at a site along a fault. The key to our method is to incorporate the variability in displacement observed in 14 modern events, which allows a formal uncertainty in magnitude to be assigned to prehistoric ruptures. We show how multiple measurements along a preserved fraction of a rupture can be combined to reduce the uncertainty in the estimate of magnitude. Our analysis shows that uncertainty asymptotically approaches the natural variability of ruptures, so 5 to 10 displacement measurements are sufficient to characterize paleomagnitude. We conclude that sampling of scarps with lengths of even 10% of the original rupture can provide magnitude values that reasonably estimate the earthquake. Tests of the method, using randomly sampled data from the 1992 M w 7.3 Landers and 1954 M s 6.8 Dixie Valley earthquakes, provide close approximations of the actual magnitudes.

[1]  Robert V. Sharp,et al.  Surface faulting in the central Imperial Valley: in The Imperial Valley, California Earthquake of October 15, 1979 , 1982 .

[2]  W. Thatcher,et al.  Seismic and aseismic deformation associated with the 1952 Kern County, California, earthquake and relationship to the quaternary history of the White Wolf fault , 1981 .

[3]  S. Ward,et al.  Comparison of the 1959 Hebgen Lake, Montana and the 1983 Borah Peak, Idaho, earthquakes from geodetic observations , 1987 .

[4]  D. Wells,et al.  New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[5]  Jerome A. Treiman,et al.  Near-Field Investigations of the Landers Earthquake Sequence, April to July 1992 , 1993, Science.

[6]  D. P. Schwartz,et al.  The Wasatch fault zone, utah—segmentation and history of Holocene earthquakes , 1991 .

[7]  D. P. Schwartz,et al.  A 100-Year Average Recurrence Interval for the San Andreas Fault at Wrightwood, California , 1993, Science.

[8]  H. J. Arnold Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990 .

[9]  Kerry E Sieh,et al.  Slip along the San Andreas fault associated with the great 1857 earthquake , 1984 .

[10]  Steven G. Wesnousky,et al.  Earthquakes, quaternary faults, and seismic hazard in California , 1986 .

[11]  Peizhen Zhang,et al.  Surface faulting of the 1954 Fairview Peak (MS 7.2) and Dixie Valley (MS 6.8) earthquakes, central Nevada , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[12]  A. Barka,et al.  Slip distribution along the North Anatolian fault associated with the large earthquakes of the period 1939 to 1967 , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[13]  H. Philip,et al.  Ruptures of Major Earthquakes and Active Deformation in Mongolia and Its Surroundings , 1993 .

[14]  T. D. Rubin,et al.  Relationship of the kickapoo fault to the Johnson Valley and Homestead Valley faults, San Bernardino County, California , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[15]  D. P. Schwartz,et al.  Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes: Examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas Fault Zones , 1984 .

[16]  Robert S. Yeats,et al.  The geology of earthquakes , 1997 .