Control of cell morphology and differentiation by substrates with independently tunable elasticity and viscous dissipation

The mechanical properties of extracellular matrices can control the function of cells. Studies of cellular responses to biomimetic soft materials have been largely restricted to hydrogels and elastomers that have stiffness values independent of time and extent of deformation, so the substrate stiffness can be unambiguously related to its effect on cells. Real tissues, however, often have loss moduli that are 10 to 20% of their elastic moduli and behave as viscoelastic solids. The response of cells to a time-dependent viscous loss is largely uncharacterized because appropriate viscoelastic materials are lacking for quantitative studies. Here we report the synthesis of soft viscoelastic solids in which the elastic and viscous moduli can be independently tuned to produce gels with viscoelastic properties that closely resemble those of soft tissues. Systematic alteration of the hydrogel viscosity demonstrates the time dependence of cellular mechanosensing and the influence of viscous dissipation on cell phenotype.Purely elastic biomimetic soft materials are used to characterize the mechanical response of cells, but do not resemble real tissues. Here the authors develop a viscoelastic solid hydrogel, based on polyacrylamide, that can be tuned to closely resemble soft tissue, and show the influence of viscous dissipation on cellular mechanical sensing.

[1]  E. Fama,et al.  Migration , 2007 .

[2]  S. Roseman,et al.  Specific adhesion of rat hepatocytes to beta-galactosides linked to polyacrylamide gels. , 1978, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[3]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  Focal adhesion size controls tension-dependent recruitment of α-smooth muscle actin to stress fibers , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  Ali Othmane,et al.  Evaluation of endothelial cell adherence onto collagen and fibronectin: A comparison between jet impingement and flow chamber techniques , 2006 .

[5]  P. Janmey,et al.  A simple indentation device for measuring micrometer-scale tissue stiffness , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[6]  Aleksandra K. Denisin,et al.  Tuning the Range of Polyacrylamide Gel Stiffness for Mechanobiology Applications. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[7]  G C Lee,et al.  On nonlinear viscoelastic properties of arterial tissue. , 1984, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[8]  Victor Steinberg,et al.  Concentration dependence of the longest relaxation times of dilute and semi-dilute polymer solutions , 2009 .

[9]  J. Saver,et al.  A Quantitative Study , 2005 .

[10]  K. Anseth,et al.  Biophysically Defined and Cytocompatible Covalently Adaptable Networks as Viscoelastic 3D Cell Culture Systems , 2014, Advances in Materials.

[11]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[12]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[13]  P. Janmey,et al.  Hepatic stellate cells require a stiff environment for myofibroblastic differentiation. , 2011, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.

[14]  T. Aoyagi,et al.  Substrate Fluidity Regulates Cell Adhesion and Morphology on Poly(ε-caprolactone)-Based Materials. , 2016, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.

[15]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Tianfu Wang,et al.  Quantification of liver viscoelasticity with acoustic radiation force: a study of hepatic fibrosis in a rat model. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  Sergey V. Plotnikov,et al.  Force Fluctuations within Focal Adhesions Mediate ECM-Rigidity Sensing to Guide Directed Cell Migration , 2012, Cell.

[18]  David J Odde,et al.  Traction Dynamics of Filopodia on Compliant Substrates , 2008, Science.

[19]  M. Lacouture,et al.  A Comparison of Type I Collagen, Fibronectin, and Vitronectin in Supporting Adhesion of Mechanically Strained Osteoblasts , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  L. Bilston,et al.  On the viscoelastic character of liver tissue: experiments and modelling of the linear behaviour. , 2000, Biorheology.

[21]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity , 2015, Nature materials.

[22]  B. Geiger,et al.  Assembly and mechanosensory function of focal contacts. , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.

[23]  D. G. T. Strange,et al.  Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. , 2012, Nature materials.

[24]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Substrate stress relaxation regulates cell spreading , 2015, Nature Communications.

[25]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[26]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  M. Abdouss,et al.  Viscoelastic Properties of Human Tracheal Tissues. , 2017, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[28]  G. Gabbiani Faculty Opinions recommendation of Focal adhesion size controls tension-dependent recruitment of alpha-smooth muscle actin to stress fibers. , 2006 .

[29]  P. Janmey,et al.  Normal and Fibrotic Rat Livers Demonstrate Shear Strain Softening and Compression Stiffening: A Model for Soft Tissue Mechanics , 2016, PloS one.

[30]  Joe Tien,et al.  Mechanotransduction at cell-matrix and cell-cell contacts. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[31]  Anant Chopra,et al.  Cardiac myocyte remodeling mediated by N-cadherin-dependent mechanosensing. , 2011, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[32]  Lynne E Bilston,et al.  Rheological properties of the tissues of the central nervous system: a review. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[33]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of human bladder tumours. , 2016, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[34]  Ovijit Chaudhuri,et al.  Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells. , 2016, Biophysical journal.

[35]  P. Janmey,et al.  A comparison of hyperelastic constitutive models applicable to brain and fat tissues , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[36]  T. Aminabhavi,et al.  Some Solution Properties of Polyacrylamide , 1980 .

[37]  Justin Cooper-White,et al.  The influence of substrate creep on mesenchymal stem cell behaviour and phenotype. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[38]  Cees W J Oomens,et al.  Linear viscoelastic behavior of subcutaneous adipose tissue. , 2008, Biorheology.

[39]  Guillermo A. Gomez,et al.  The effect of time-dependent deformation of viscoelastic hydrogels on myogenic induction and Rac1 activity in mesenchymal stem cells. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[40]  S. Della Bella,et al.  Comparison of Fibronectin and Collagen in Supporting the Isolation and Expansion of Endothelial Progenitor Cells from Human Adult Peripheral Blood , 2013, PloS one.

[41]  Yu Suk Choi,et al.  Interplay of Matrix Stiffness and Protein Tethering in Stem Cell Differentiation , 2014, Nature materials.

[42]  N. Balaban,et al.  Calculation of forces at focal adhesions from elastic substrate data: the effect of localized force and the need for regularization. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[43]  Christopher K. Glass,et al.  Myofibroblasts revert to an inactive phenotype during regression of liver fibrosis , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  P. Janmey,et al.  Compression stiffening of brain and its effect on mechanosensing by glioma cells , 2014, New journal of physics.

[45]  Dieter Klatt,et al.  Non‐invasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance elastography , 2008, NMR in biomedicine.

[46]  G. Forgacs,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of living embryonic tissues: a quantitative study. , 1998, Biophysical journal.