The acceptance of blockchain technology in meat traceability and transparency

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate meat traceability by outlining the different perspectives and opinions of meat supply chain stakeholders (SCSs); it also evaluates potential of acceptance of blockchain technology (BCT) as a viable transparency and traceability system (TTS). Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire survey of 141 consumers reveals their opinions about TTSs. In addition, semi-structured interviews with seven retail managers, four government officials and one blockchain service provider (Project Provenance Ltd) provide expert insights. Findings The results demonstrate that consumers are overwhelmed by the amount and complexity of certification labels. As a TTS, BCT implementation appears to have significant positive influences on consumers’ purchasing decisions, mediated by consumers’ quality perceptions. This study reveals the discordant perspectives of different stakeholders with regard to the importance of a BCT-based TTS. Originality/value This study investigates current TTSs and certification labels, and probes customer perception of a potential BCT-based solution for meat traceability. Changes to supply chains’ mentality and the active establishment of trust in BCT applications are needed. Firms should take both holistic and altruistic views to deal with the challenges of TTSs in the meat supply chain. The adoption of BCT, in combination with DNA coding, seems promising as a solution to many of the issues that currently plague TTSs.

[1]  Peter J. Stavroulakis,et al.  The Impact of Time on Product-Harm Crises in the Food Industry : The Case of IKEA ’ s Meatballs , 2013 .

[2]  Victoria L. Lemieux,et al.  Trusting records: is Blockchain technology the answer? , 2016 .

[3]  L. Frewer,et al.  Consumer perceptions of traceability: A cross-national comparison of the associated benefits , 2008 .

[4]  Lisa F. Clark.  The current status of DNA barcoding technology for species identification in fish value chains , 2015 .

[5]  Jacqueline M. Bloemhof,et al.  Systems for sustainability and transparency of food supply chains - Current status and challenges , 2011, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[6]  D. Dickinson,et al.  Meat Traceability: Are U.S. Consumers Willing to Pay for It? , 2002 .

[7]  Adrie J. M. Beulens,et al.  Transparency in complex dynamic food supply chains , 2012, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[8]  Linhai Wu,et al.  The acceptability of certified traceable food among Chinese consumers , 2011 .

[9]  B. Pérez-Villarreal,et al.  Misdescription incidents in seafood sector , 2016 .

[10]  W. Verbeke,et al.  Consumer interest in information cues denoting quality, traceability and origin: An application of ordered probit models to beef labels , 2006 .

[11]  Nga T. T. Mai,et al.  Benefits of traceability in fish supply chains – case studies , 2010 .

[12]  Waldemar Toporowski,et al.  CSR failures in food supply chains – an agency perspective , 2013 .

[13]  Gyan Prakash,et al.  A Framework for Traceability and Transparency in the Dairy Supply Chain Networks , 2015 .

[14]  David Boddy,et al.  The expertise of the change agent: Public performance and backstage activity , 1992 .

[15]  Samuel O. Idowu,et al.  Corporate social responsibility : challenges, opportunities and strategies for 21st century leaders , 2013 .

[16]  Jay P. Graham,et al.  Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health. , 2008, Annual review of public health.

[17]  Feng Tian,et al.  An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology , 2016, 2016 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM).

[18]  Zetian Fu,et al.  Development and evaluation on a RFID-based traceability system for cattle/beef quality safety in China , 2013 .

[19]  Jeffrey Alun Jones,et al.  Food supply chain , 2016 .

[20]  Bedir Tekinerdogan,et al.  Realizing chain-wide transparency in meat supply chains based on global standards and a reference architecture , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[21]  Karen Brunsø,et al.  Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector-a review. , 2004, Meat science.

[22]  ChiaCheng Chao,et al.  Determining technology trends and forecasts of RFID by a historical review and bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2005 , 2007 .

[23]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Pathways to increase consumer trust in meat as a safe and wholesome food. , 2006, Meat science.

[24]  T. Davenport.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[25]  A. Beulens,et al.  Enabling chain-wide transparency in meat supply chains based on the EPCIS global standard and cloud-based services , 2014 .

[26]  S. Mann.  Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach , 2013 .

[27]  T. Vukasović.  Consumer perception of poultry meat and the importance of country of origin in a purchase making process , 2009 .