Spatial and temporal characterization of the focusing of ultrashort pulses by high-NA objectives for ultrafast multiphoton microscopy

As ultrafast multiphoton microscopes become more useful for biological imaging, a major challenge for researchers is to determine the exposure conditions that provide the best combination of image resolution, contrast and specimen viability. To do this requires an accurate understanding of the spatial and temporal evolution of ultrashort pulses at the focus produced by a microscope objective. The objective itself, however, can significantly alter the pulses. Some effects, such as the broadening of pulses due to group delay dispersion in materials along the path, are understood and partial compensation for them can be made. Other effects, such as radial variations in the propagation time and variations in the pulse width, are less well understood. In this work, we investigate the radially dependent propagation and focusing of ultrashort pulses through a Zeiss CP- Achromat 100X, 1.25 NA, infinity-corrected, oil immersion microscope objective. We also extend to this high numerical aperture case the technique of collinear type II second harmonic generation frequency-resolved optical grating which has previously been used to measure the temporal intensity and phase of ultrashort pulses at the focus of air objectives with lower numerical aperture.

[1]  U. Stamm,et al.  Spatial and temporal transformation of femtosecond laser pulses by lenses with annular aperture , 1992 .

[2]  Z. Bor,et al.  Distortion of femtosecond laser pulses in lenses and lens systems. , 1988 .

[3]  Rick Trebino,et al.  Measuring ultrashort laser pulses in the time-frequency domain using frequency-resolved optical gating , 1997 .

[4]  P. So,et al.  Cellular response to near-infrared femtosecond laser pulses in two-photon microscopes. , 1997, Optics letters.

[5]  D N Fittinghoff,et al.  Collinear type II second-harmonic-generation frequency-resolved optical gating for use with high-numerical-aperture objectives. , 1998, Optics letters.

[6]  Jeffrey A. Squier,et al.  Radially varying dispersion in high-numerical-aperture focusing , 1998, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[7]  Vladislav V. Yakovlev,et al.  Measurement and modeling of the focusing of 15 femtosecond optical pulses with a high-numerical-aperture objective , 1998 .

[8]  David N. Fittinghoff,et al.  Frequency-resolved optical gating measurement of ultrashort pulses passing through a high numerical aperture objective , 1999 .

[9]  D. Kleinfeld,et al.  Anatomical and functional imaging of neurons using 2-photon laser scanning microscopy , 1994, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[10]  M Kempe,et al.  Impact of chromatic and spherical aberration on the focusing of ultrashort light pulses by lenses. , 1993, Optics letters.

[11]  D. Kane,et al.  Using phase retrieval to measure the intensity and phase of ultrashort pulses: frequency-resolved optical gating , 1993 .

[12]  Rudolph,et al.  Femtosecond pulses in the focal region of lenses. , 1993, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[13]  J. Squier,et al.  Measurement of femtosecond pulses in the focal point of a high-numerical-aperture lens by two-photon absorption. , 1995, Optics letters.

[14]  D. Kane,et al.  Characterization of arbitrary femtosecond pulses using frequency-resolved optical gating , 1993 .

[15]  Andrew M. Weiner,et al.  Effect of group velocity mismatch on the measurement of ultrashort optical pulses via second harmonic generation , 1983 .

[16]  D. Kleinfeld,et al.  In vivo dendritic calcium dynamics in neocortical pyramidal neurons , 1997, Nature.

[17]  J. Squier,et al.  Dispersion pre‐compensation of 15 femtosecond optical pulses for high‐numerical‐aperture objectives , 1998, Journal of microscopy.