Prevalence, specificity, and clinical association of anti-phospholipid antibodies in COVID-19 patients: are the antibodies really guilty?

Background. Critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have a profound hypercoagulable state and often develop coagulopathy which leads to organ failure and death. Because of a prolonged activated partial-thromboplastin time (aPTT), a relationship with anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL) has been proposed, but results are controversial. Functional assays for aPL (i.e., lupus anticoagulant) can be influenced by concomitant anticoagulation and/or high levels of C reactive protein. The presence of anti-cardiolipin (aCL), anti-beta2-glycoprotein I (anti-{beta}2GPI and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies was not investigated systematically. Epitope specificity of anti-{beta}2GPI antibodies was not reported. Aim. To evaluate the prevalence and the clinical association of aPL in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients, and to characterize the epitope specificity of anti-{beta}2GPI antibodies. Methods. ELISA and chemiluminescence assays were used to test 122 sera of patients suffering from severe COVID-19. Of them, 16 displayed major thrombotic events. Results. Anti-{beta}2GPI IgG/IgA/IgM were the most frequent in 15.6/6.6/9.0% of patients, while aCL IgG/IgM were detected in 5.7/6.6% by ELISA. Comparable values were found by chemiluminescence. aPS/PT IgG/IgM were detectable in 2.5 and 9.8% by ELISA. No association between thrombosis and aPL was found. Reactivity against domain 1 and 4-5 of {beta}2GPI was limited to 3/58 (5.2%) tested sera for each domain and did not correlate with aCL/anti-{beta}2GPI nor with thrombosis. Conclusion. aPL show a low prevalence in COVID-19 patients and are not associated with major thrombotic events. aPL in COVID-19 patients are mainly directed against {beta}2GPI but display an epitope specificity different from antibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome.

[1]  Z. Amoura,et al.  High frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill COVID‐19 patients: a link with hypercoagulability? , 2020, Journal of internal medicine.

[2]  Zhiwei Chen,et al.  The J-elongated conformation of β2-glycoprotein I predominates in solution: implications for our understanding of antiphospholipid syndrome , 2020, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  E. Ferrazzi,et al.  EUREKA algorithm predicts obstetric risk and response to treatment in women with different subsets of anti-phospholipid antibodies. , 2020, Rheumatology.

[4]  F. Blasi,et al.  Complement activation in patients with COVID-19: A novel therapeutic target , 2020, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[5]  S. Sivapalaratnam,et al.  Lupus Anticoagulant and Abnormal Coagulation Tests in Patients with Covid-19 , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  J. Fichet,et al.  Venous Thrombosis Among Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) , 2020, JAMA network open.

[7]  S. Farmer,et al.  Characteristics of ischaemic stroke associated with COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[8]  B. Drénou,et al.  Lupus anticoagulant is frequent in patients with Covid‐19 , 2020, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[9]  L. Beenen,et al.  Incidence of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 , 2020, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[10]  D. Gommers,et al.  Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19 , 2020, Thrombosis Research.

[11]  S. Antinori,et al.  Pulmonary post-mortem findings in a large series of COVID-19 cases from Northern Italy , 2020, medRxiv.

[12]  Xiaowei Yan,et al.  Coagulopathy and Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Patients with Covid-19 , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Dengju Li,et al.  Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia , 2020, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[14]  V. Pengo,et al.  Tetra positive thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: Major contribution of anti‐phosphatidyl‐serine/prothrombin antibodies to lupus anticoagulant activity , 2020, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[15]  Qin Ning,et al.  Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019 , 2020 .

[16]  P. D. de Groot,et al.  New insight into antiphospholipid syndrome: antibodies to β2glycoprotein I-domain 5 fail to induce thrombi in rats , 2018, Haematologica.

[17]  A. Tincani,et al.  Beyond thrombosis: Anti-β2GPI domain 1 antibodies identify late pregnancy morbidity in anti-phospholipid syndrome. , 2018, Journal of autoimmunity.

[18]  D. Roccatello,et al.  Prevalence and Thrombotic Risk Assessment of Anti-β2 Glycoprotein I Domain I Antibodies: A Systematic Review , 2017, Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis.

[19]  M. Mahler,et al.  A Clinical Approach for Defining the Threshold between Low and Medium Anti-Cardiolipin Antibody Levels for QUANTA Flash Assays , 2016, Antibodies.

[20]  A. Tincani,et al.  Clinical Characterization of Antiphospholipid Syndrome by Detection of IgG Antibodies Against β2‐Glycoprotein I Domain 1 and Domain 4/5: Ratio of Anti–Domain 1 to Anti–Domain 4/5 As a Useful New Biomarker for Antiphospholipid Syndrome , 2015, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[21]  H. Kaasjager,et al.  When to screen for lupus anticoagulant? Influence of testing during acute phase and consequences for clinical practise , 2015, Lupus.

[22]  M. Giménez,et al.  Frequent False‐positive results of lupus anticoagulant tests in plasmas of patients receiving the new oral anticoagulants and enoxaparin , 2014, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[23]  J. Delanghe,et al.  Lupus Anticoagulant (LAC) testing in patients with inflammatory status: does C-reactive protein interfere with LAC test results? , 2010, Thrombosis research.

[24]  M. García-Carrasco,et al.  Infections and the Antiphospholipid Syndrome , 2009, Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology.

[25]  A. Tincani,et al.  Are the current attempts at standardization of antiphospholipid antibodies still useful? Emerging technologies signal a shift in direction. , 2008, Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis.

[26]  A. Tincani,et al.  Antiprothrombin antibodies: a comparative analysis of homemade and commercial methods. A collaborative study by the Forum Interdisciplinare per la Ricerca nelle Malattie Autoimmuni (FIRMA). , 2007, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[27]  Wendy Kehl-Pruett Deep Vein Thrombosis in Hospitalized Patients , 2006 .

[28]  K. Laczika,et al.  Frequent development of lupus anticoagulants in critically ill patients treated under intensive care conditions , 2002, Critical care medicine.

[29]  E. Harris,et al.  Diagnosis and management of antiphospholipid syndrome. , 1994, Hospital practice.