Creative Machine Performance: Computational Creativity and Robotic Art

The invention of machine performers has a long tradition as a method of philosophically probing the nature of creativity. Robotic art practices in the 20th Century have continued in this tradition, playfully engaging the public in questions of autonomy and agency. In this position paper, we explore the potential synergies between robotic art practice and computational creativity research through the development of robotic performances. This interdisciplinary approach permits the development of significantly new modes of interaction for robotic artworks, and potentially opens up computational models of creativity to rich social and cultural environments through interaction with audiences. We present our exploration of this potential with the development of Zwischenr¨ (In-between Spaces), an artwork that embeds curious robots into the walls of a gallery. The installation extends the traditional relationship between the audience and artwork such that visitors to the space become performers for the machine.

[1]  Australian Centre for Field Robotics , 2022 .

[2]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Learning from delayed rewards , 1995, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[3]  Jakob von Uexküll,et al.  A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds , 1992 .

[4]  D. Berlyne.  Conflict, arousal, and curiosity , 2014 .

[5]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Elephants don't play chess , 1990, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[6]  Ryoji Ikeda.  Digital Art , 2010 .

[7]  Ingeborg Reichle.  Art in the Age of Technoscience: Genetic Engineering, Robotics, and Artificial Life in Contemporary Art , 2009 .

[8]  Hong Hong,et al.  Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology , 2001, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[9]  Rob Saunders,et al.  Curious Design Agents and Artificial Creativity - A Synthetic Approach to the Study of Creative Behaviour , 2001 .

[10]  K. Hultén,et al.  Jean Tinguely: A Magic Stronger Than Death , 1961 .

[11]  E. Thompson,et al.  Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience , 2005 .

[12]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organization and Associative Memory , 1988 .

[13]  P. Humphreys.  Convergence: The Journal of Research into New Media Technologies , 2002 .

[14]  Stuart Mealing.  Computers and Art , 2007 .

[15]  Jan Lazardzig.  The Machine as Spectacle: Function and Admiration in Seventeenth-Century Perspectives on Machines , 2008 .

[16]  Eduardo Kac.  Towards a Chronology of Robotic Art , 2001 .

[17]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[18]  Guy Hoffman,et al.  Interactive improvisation with a robotic marimba player , 2011, Auton. Robots.

[19]  Andy Clark,et al.  Where brain, body, and world collide , 1998, Cognitive Systems Research.

[20]  H. Maturana,et al.  The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding , 2007 .

[21]  S. Penny.  15. Agents as Artworks and Agent Design as Artistic Practice , 2000 .

[22]  E. Kac.  Foundation and Development of Robotic Art , 1997 .

[23]  Karen Barad.  Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[24]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology , 2000 .

[25]  칼빈 톰킨스.  장 팅글리(Jean Tinguely) , 2000 .

[26]  Jean Tinguely.  A Magic Stronger Than Death , 1992 .