Effects of Reform-Based Mathematics Instruction on Low Achievers in Five Third-Grade Classrooms

In this study we examined the responses of 16 low-achieving students to reform-based mathematics instruction in 5 elementary classrooms for 1 year. We used qualitative methods at 2 schools to identify the needs of low achievers in these classrooms, which were using an innovative curriculum. Through classroom observations and interviews with teachers, we studied the involvement of low achievers in whole-class discussions and pair work. Results suggested that both the organization and task demands of the reform classrooms presented verbal and social challenges to low achievers that need to be addressed if these students are to benefit from reform-based mathematics instruction.

[1]  I. Seidman.  Interviewing as qualitative research , 1991 .

[2]  C. Hirsch.  Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics , 1988 .

[3]  N. Zigmond,et al.  Are Regular Education Classes Equipped to Accommodate Students with Learning Disabilities? , 1990, Exceptional children.

[4]  Lynne S. Arnault.  Teaching Advanced Skills to At-Risk Students , 1993 .

[5]  T. Good.  Teacher Expectations and Student Perceptions: A Decade of Research. , 1981 .

[6]  Thomas L. Good,et al.  Grouping for instruction in mathematics: A call for programmatic research on small-group processes. , 1992 .

[7]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[8]  Catherine M. Mulryan.  Fifth and Sixth Graders' Involvement and Participation in Cooperative Small Groups in Mathematics , 1995, The Elementary School Journal.

[9]  Alice F. Artz,et al.  Development of a Cognitive-Metacognitive Framework for Protocol Analysis of Mathematical Problem Solving in Small Groups , 1992 .

[10]  D. Ball.  With an Eye on the Mathematical Horizon: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary School Mathematics , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[11]  Edward A. Silver,et al.  Many Voices, Many Views , 1985, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

[12]  Cognitive Instruction and Mathematics: Implications for Students with Learning Disorders. , 1995 .

[13]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[14]  Leonard H. King.  High and Low Achievers' Perceptions and Cooperative Learning in Two Small Groups , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[15]  B. Wong.  Pursuing an Elusive Goal: Molding Strategic Teachers and Learners , 1993, Journal of learning disabilities.

[16]  P. Peterson.  Using Children's Mathematical Knowledge. , 1991 .

[17]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Teacher Perceptions of Mainstreaming/Inclusion, 1958–1995: A Research Synthesis , 1996 .

[18]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[19]  J. Woodward,et al.  The Effects of an Innovative Approach to Mathematics on Academically Low-Achieving Students in Inclusive Settings , 1997 .

[20]  K. Fuson,et al.  Advancing children's mathematical thinking in everyday mathematics classrooms , 1999 .

[21]  E. Jones,et al.  Mathematics: Educational Tools for Diverse Learners. , 1994 .

[22]  Elizabeth Fennema,et al.  Using Children’s Mathematical Knowledge in Instruction , 1993 .

[23]  Daniel Solomon,et al.  Interaction Processes and Student Outcomes in Cooperative Learning Groups , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[24]  R. Elmore.  Getting to Scale with Good Educational Practice , 1996 .

[25]  B. Glaser.  Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[26]  Juliet A. Baxter,et al.  Dilemmas of Discourse-Oriented Teaching in One Middle School Mathematics Classroom , 1996, The Elementary School Journal.

[27]  A. Hofmeister.  Elitism and Reform in School Mathematics , 1993 .

[28]  Lauren B. Resnick,et al.  Thinking in Arithmetic Class. , 1991 .

[29]  P. Cobb,et al.  Characteristics of Classroom Mathematics Traditions: An Interactional Analysis , 1992 .

[30]  P. Cobb,et al.  Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. , 1993 .

[31]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  General Education Teacher Planning: What Can Students with Learning Disabilities Expect? , 1995 .

[32]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[33]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[34]  M. Montague,et al.  The Effects of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Instruction on the Mathematical Problem Solving of Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities , 1992, Journal of learning disabilities.