Comparisons of computational fluid dynamics solutions of static and manoeuvring fighter aircraft with flight test data

Abstract As the capabilities of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to model full aircraft configurations improve, and the speeds of massively parallel machines increase, it is expected that CFD simulations will be used more and more to steer or in some cases even replace traditional flight test analyses. The mission of the US Air Force SEEK EAGLE office is to clear any new weapon configurations and loadings for operational use. As more complex weapons are developed and highly asymmetric loadings are requested, the SEEK EAGLE office is tasked with providing operational clearances for literally thousands of different flight configurations. High-fidelity CFD simulations employing the turbulent Navier—Stokes equations are in a prime position to help reduce some of the required wind-tunnel and/or flight test workload. However, these types of CFD simulations are still too time consuming to populate a full stability and control parameter database in a brute-force manner. This article reviews results previously published by the authors, which validate the ability of high-fidelity CFD techniques to compute static force and moment characteristics of aircraft configurations. A methodology to generate efficient but non-linear reduced-order aerodynamic loads models from dynamic CFD solutions, which in-turn may be used to quickly analyse various stability and control characteristics at a particular flight condition, is introduced, and the results based on the US Air Force F-16C fighter aircraft that exemplify the process are discussed.

[1]  Scott M. Murman,et al.  Automated Parameter Studies Using a Cartesian Method , 2004 .

[2]  Scott M. Murman,et al.  Computation of F/A-18 tail buffet , 1996 .

[3]  Scott L. Lawrence,et al.  Generation of Aerodynamic Data using a Design of Experiment and Data Fusion Approach , 2005 .

[4]  Scott M. Murman,et al.  Computational investigation of slot blowing for fuselage forebody flow control , 1999 .

[5]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[6]  G. Redeker,et al.  A new vortex flow experiment for computer code validation , 2001 .

[7]  Farhad Ghaffari,et al.  Navier-Stokes, flight, and wind tunnel flow analysis for the F/A-18 aircraft , 1994 .

[8]  Ralph D. Kimberlin,et al.  Flight testing of fixed-wing aircraft , 2003 .

[9]  John E. Lamar,et al.  Review of Cranked-Arrow Wing Aerodynamics Project: Its International Aeronautical Community Role , 2007 .

[10]  Northrop Grumman,et al.  RESIDUAL PITCH OSCILLATION (RPO) FLIGHT TEST AND ANALYSIS ON THE B-2 BOMBER , 1998 .

[11]  Robert Tomaro,et al.  Cobalt: a parallel, implicit, unstructured Euler/Navier-Stokes solver , 1998 .

[12]  Eugene A. Morelli,et al.  Application of System Identification to Aircraft at NASA Langley Research Center , 2005 .

[13]  Syta Saephan,et al.  Determination of Dynamic Stability Information Through Simulation of a Tumbling Tailless Aircraft , 2006 .

[14]  B.H.K. Lee,et al.  Vertical tail buffeting of fighter aircraft , 2000 .

[15]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Computational Aircraft and Armament Stability and Control Techniques Applied to the F-16 , 2006 .

[16]  George Karypis,et al.  Parmetis parallel graph partitioning and sparse matrix ordering library , 1997 .

[17]  Russell M. Cummings,et al.  F- 16XL Unsteady Simulations for the CAWAPI Facet of RTO Task Group AVT- 113 , 2007 .

[18]  Stefan Goertz,et al.  Efficient High Resolution Modeling of Fighter Aircraft with Stores for Stability and Control Clearance , 2007 .

[19]  D. Liu,et al.  State-of-the-art of unsteady aerodynamics for high performance aircraft , 2001 .

[20]  Larry A. Meyn,et al.  Full-scale wind-tunnel studies of F/A-18 tail buffet , 1996 .

[21]  R. Cummings,et al.  Detached-eddy simulation with compressibility corrections applied to a supersonic axisymmetric base flow , 2002 .

[22]  Lakshmi N. Sankar,et al.  An implicit algorithm for solving time dependent flows on unstructured grids , 1997 .

[23]  Ravindra Jategaonkar,et al.  Aerodynamic Modeling and System Identification from Flight Data , 2005, Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies.

[24]  P. Spalart,et al.  A New Version of Detached-eddy Simulation, Resistant to Ambiguous Grid Densities , 2006 .

[25]  Russell M. Cummings,et al.  DES GRID RESOLUTION ISSUES FOR VORTICAL FLOWS ON A DELTA WING AND AN F-18C , 2003 .

[26]  Ismet Gursul,et al.  Review of Unsteady Vortex Flows Over Delta Wings , 2003 .

[27]  Donald T. Ward Introduction To Flight Test Engineering , 1993 .

[28]  Scott A. Morton,et al.  Analysis of Delta-Wing Vortical Substructures Using Detached-Eddy Simulation , 2006 .

[29]  Essam F. Sheta,et al.  Alleviation of Vertical Tail Buffeting of F/A-18 Aircraft , 2004 .

[30]  E. Morelli Global nonlinear parametric modelling with application to F-16 aerodynamics , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207).

[31]  Eugene A. Morelli,et al.  Aircraft system identification : theory and practice , 2006 .

[32]  Ken Gee,et al.  Development of Intelligent Agents for the Generation of Aerodynamic Data , 2003 .

[33]  Eugene A. Morelli,et al.  System IDentification Programs for AirCraft (SIDPAC) , 2002 .

[34]  Scott M. Murman,et al.  Reduced-Frequency Approach for Calculating Dynamic Derivatives , 2007 .

[35]  Darrol Stinton,et al.  Flying qualities and flight testing of the airplane , 1996 .

[36]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Aircraft Control and Simulation , 1992 .

[37]  P. Spalart,et al.  Detached-Eddy Simulation of the F-15E at High Alpha , 2004 .

[38]  Scott A. Morton,et al.  Detached-Eddy Simulations and Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations of Delta Wing Vortical Flowfields , 2002 .

[39]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Towards an Efficient Aircraft Stability and Control Analysis Capability Using High-Fidelity CFD , 2007 .

[40]  Robert Tomaro,et al.  The defining methods of Cobalt-60 - A parallel, implicit, unstructured Euler/Navier-Stokes flow solver , 1999 .

[41]  E Lamar John,et al.  Flight, Wind-Tunnel, and Computational Fluid Dynamics Comparison for Cranked Arrow Wing (F-16XL-1) at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds , 2001 .

[42]  David F. Fisher,et al.  Summary of in-flight flow visualization obtained from the NASA high alpha research vehicle , 1991 .

[43]  James R. Forsythe,et al.  Detached-eddy simulation of fighter aircraft at high alpha , 2002 .

[44]  D. McLean Performance, Stability, Dynamics, and Control of Airplanes, B. N. Pamadi, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1801 Alexnader Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191, USA. 1998. 766pp. Illustrated. $69.95 (AIAA Members), $94.94 (Non-Members). , 1999 .

[45]  Russell M. Cummings,et al.  DES Turbulence Modeling on the C-130 Comparison between Computational and Experimental Results , 2005 .

[46]  Scott A. Morton,et al.  Detached-Eddy Simulations of Full Aircraft Experiencing Massively Separated Flows , 2005 .

[47]  Stuart E. Rogers,et al.  Automated CFD Parameter Studies on Distributed Parallel Computers , 2003 .

[48]  Scott A. Morton,et al.  HIGH RESOLUTION TURBULENCE TREATMENT OF F/A-18 TAIL BUFFET , 2004 .

[49]  J. Forsythe,et al.  Unsteady Computations of Abrupt Wing Stall Using Detached-Eddy Simulation , 2005 .