Design and evaluation of an augmented reality welding helmet

The article describes the development and ergonomic evaluation of an augmented reality (AR) welding helmet. The system provides an augmented user interface with supporting information relevant to the welding process. The experimental studies focused on hand–eye coordination of welders and nonwelders with two prototypes of the augmented reality welding helmet. The first prototype operated at 16 frames per second, whereas the second, improved version had 20 frames per second. In addition, the hand–eye coordination while wearing the welding helmet with video see-through head-mounted display was compared to a performance with natural vision, without any helmet. Experimental results showed significant influence of helmet and occupation on hand–eye coordination. Subjective assessment revealed better rating for stereo perception for the system with the higher frame rate, whereas no significant difference in performance was found between the two frame rates. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Hum Factors Man 17: 317–330, 2007.

[1]  Axel Gräser,et al.  TEREBES : welding helmet with AR capabilities , 2004 .

[2]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Space teleoperation through time delay: review and prognosis , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[3]  Masahiko Inami,et al.  Improvement of Temporal Quality of HMD for Rotational Motion , 1998 .

[4]  William G. Rippey,et al.  THE NIST AUTOMATED ARC WELDING TESTBED , 1997 .

[5]  Robert C. Williges,et al.  An application of augmented reality to thickness inspection , 1999 .

[6]  Markku Mattila,et al.  Effects of the work environment and safety activities on occupational accidents in eight wood‐processing companies , 2002 .

[7]  Peter Alan Howarth,et al.  The Maintenance of Habituation to Virtual Simulation Sickness , 1999, HCI.

[8]  C. Wickens.  Human Factors in Vector Map Design: The Importance of Task-Display Dependence , 2000, Journal of Navigation.

[9]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  Evaluation of the Effects of a Head-mounted Display on Ocular Accommodation , 1998, Presence.

[10]  Klaus Radermacher,et al.  Stereoscopic Visualization in Endoscopic Surgery: Problems, Benefits, and Potentials , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Health and Safety Implications of Virtual Environments: Measurement Issues , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  Olaf Oehme,et al.  Augmented Reality (AR) for Assembly Processes Design and Experimental Evaluation , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  P A Howarth,et al.  The nauseogenicity of two methods of navigating within a virtual environment. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Virtual Eyes Can Rearrange Your Body: Adaptation to Visual Displacement in See-Through, Head-Mounted Displays , 1998, Presence.

[15]  Bernard D. Adelstein,et al.  Discriminability of Prediction Artifacts in a Time-Delayed Virtual Environment , 2000 .

[16]  T B Sheridan,et al.  Teleoperator Performance with Varying Force and Visual Feedback , 1994, Human factors.