A Perspective for the Implementation of a Path Towards the Factory of the Future: The Italian Case

This work presents a case study analysis aiming at depicting a perspective for the implementation of a path towards the Factory of the Future (FoF) and Industry 4.0 (14.0) in organizations of the Italian manufacturing value chain. Starting from the presentation and framing of related supporting initiatives at national and regional level and a review of current literature on digitalization of manufacturing, the paper analyses and discusses good and best practices along three specific dimensions: investments in FoF/14.0 technologies, ability in perceiving and facing the path towards FoF/14.0, knowledge transfer. A set of business cases addressing different actors of the manufacturing supply chain (large companies and SMEs, technology providers and research and innovation players) has been selected for investigating the challenges related to the implementation of the FoF/14.0 paradigm. The main contribution of this work relates to the identification of best practices highlighting enablers and barriers for the adoption of FoF/14.0 technologies based on a theoretical framework on three dimensions, which have to be considered in close connection for an integrated vision of the digital transformation path.

[1]  K. Turowski,et al.  A Survey of Current Challenges in Manufacturing Industry and Preparation for Industry 4.0 , 2016 .

[2]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[3]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Case research in operations management , 2002 .

[4]  Jan Henrik Sieg,et al.  Managerial Challenges in Open Innovation: A Study of Innovation Intermediation in the Chemical Industry , 2010 .

[5]  J. Müller,et al.  What Drives the Implementation of Industry 4.0? The Role of Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Sustainability , 2018 .

[6]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[7]  C. Freeman.  The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[8]  Alessandro Nuvolari,et al.  The Ghost in the Attic?: The Italian National Innovation System in Historical Perspective, 1861–2011 , 2015 .

[9]  António Grilo,et al.  Factories of the future: challenges and leading innovations in intelligent manufacturing , 2017, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[10]  Andreas Schumacher,et al.  A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises , 2016 .

[11]  H. Rush,et al.  Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer , 1995 .

[12]  Frank Teuteberg,et al.  Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry , 2016, Comput. Ind..

[13]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[14]  J. Howells.  Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation , 2006 .

[15]  K. Voigt,et al.  Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0 , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[16]  Bernhard R. Katzy,et al.  Matchmaking as multi-sided market for open innovation , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[17]  Bernhard R. Katzy,et al.  Innovation intermediaries: a process view on open innovation coordination , 2013, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[19]  Michael Möhring,et al.  Industry 4.0 - Potentials for Creating Smart Products: Empirical Research Results , 2015, BIS.

[20]  Krishnan Umachandran,et al.  Industry 4.0 , 2019, Advances in Civil and Industrial Engineering.