Personal Liability and Human Free Will in the Background of Emerging Neuroethical Issues: Some Remarks Arising From Recent Case Law

In this paper, the author analyses the issues connected to emerging neurotechnologies, in particular their effects on legal concepts like capacity, liability, testimony, and evidence, and also on fundamental constitutional rights and freedoms like the right to autonomy and the right not to be treated without consent in the general framework of the principle of human dignity. Starting from preliminary remarks on the key-concepts of neuroethics/technoethics, neurolaw/technolaw, the author investigates how personal liability is changing in the framework of new scientific developments. The paper underlines that neurolaw challenges some of the traditional legal institutions in the field of law e.g., criminal law. From the point of view of ethics, the paper concludes that neuroethics is not challenged by the data coming from the use of emerging neurotechnologies, but human self-perception is strongly affected by it.

[1]  M. Reivich,et al.  Limbic activation during cue-induced cocaine craving. , 1999, The American journal of psychiatry.

[2]  Lizzie Buchen Science in court: Arrested development , 2012, Nature.

[3]  P. Rossini,et al.  Double nerve intraneural interface implant on a human amputee for robotic hand control , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  B. van den Berg,et al.  The influence of neuroscientific evidence on legal decision-making : The effect of presentation mode , 2011 .

[5]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  S. Morse The Non-Problem of Free Will in Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology , 2007, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[7]  Verso un'etica... molecolare? , 2010 .

[8]  O. Goodenough,et al.  Law and Cognitive Neuroscience , 2010 .

[9]  Emiliano Feresin Lighter sentence for murderer with 'bad genes' , 2009 .

[10]  Jerald D. Kralik,et al.  Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates , 2000, Nature.

[11]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Emerging ethical issues in neuroscience , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  P. Glimcher,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience and the law , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  T. Canli,et al.  Neuroimaging of emotion and personality: Scientific evidence and ethical considerations , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  P. Pietrini,et al.  Homo ferox: The contribution of functional brain studies to understanding the neural bases of aggressive and criminal behavior. , 2009, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[15]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.