Loud speech over noise: some spectral attributes, with gender differences.

In seeking an acoustic description of overloaded voice, simulated environmental noise was used to elicit loud speech. A total of 23 adults, 12 females and 11 males, read six passages of 90 s duration, over realistic noise presented over loudspeakers. The noise was canceled out, exposing the speech signal to analysis. Spectrum balance (SB) was defined as the level of the 2-6 kHz band relative to the 0.1-1 kHz band. SB averaged across many similar vowel segments became less negative with increasing sound pressure level (SPL), as described in the literature, but only at moderate SPL. At high SPL, SB exhibited a personal "saturation" point, above which the high-band level no longer increased faster than the overall SPL, or even stopped increasing altogether, on average at 90.3 dB (@30 cm) for females and 95.5 dB for males. Saturation occurred 6-8 dB below the personal maximum SPL, regardless of gender. The loudest productions were often characterized by a relative increase in low-frequency energy, apparently in a sharpened first formant. This suggests a change of vocal strategy when the high spectrum can rise no further. The progression of SB with SPL was characteristically different for individual subjects.

[1]  J Sundberg,et al.  Effects of subglottal pressure variation on professional baritone singers' voice sources. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  S. Ternström,et al.  Loud speech in realistic environmental noise: phonetogram data, perceptual voice quality, subjective ratings, and gender differences in healthy speakers. , 2005, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[3]  P. Alku,et al.  Dynamic Extremes of Voice in the Light of Time Domain Parameters Extracted from the Amplitude Features of Glottal Flow and Its Derivative , 2002, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[4]  J. Liénard,et al.  Effect of vocal effort on spectral properties of vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  M. Schroeder New Method of Measuring Reverberation Time , 1965 .

[6]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  The voice source in connected speech , 1997, Speech Commun..

[7]  R. Schulman,et al.  Articulatory dynamics of loud and normal speech. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Susan Thibeault,et al.  Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  Britta Hammarberg,et al.  Perceptual and acoustic analysis of dysphonia , 1986 .

[10]  Paavo Alku,et al.  On the linearity of the relationship between the sound pressure level and the negative peak amplitude of the differentiated glottal flow in vowel production , 1999, Speech Commun..

[11]  H. Traunmüller,et al.  Acoustic effects of variation in vocal effort by men, women, and children. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Peter Kitzing,et al.  LTAS criteria pertinent to the measurement of voice quality , 1986 .

[13]  K. Johnson,et al.  Formants of children, women, and men: the effects of vocal intensity variation. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  I R Titze,et al.  Vocal intensity in speakers and singers. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Maria Södersten,et al.  Cancellation of simulated environmental noise as a tool for measuring vocal performance during noise exposure. , 2002, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.