Dichotically presented emotionally intoned words produce laterality differences as a function of localisation task

Two-syllable words (burden; furrow; mantle; ration) each spoken in happy, angry, sad, and neutral tones of voice were dichotically paired. For each presented wordpair, subjects were asked to localise ("left"; "right") or reject the presence of one pre-specified word on one block of trials and one pre-specified emotional tone on a second trial block. Right ear advantages (REAs) indicated by a superior hit rate averaging 9.6% were found for all words. Left ear advantages (LEAs) averaging 15.2% were obtained for emotional intonation, with additional evidence of differences between emotion categories. Results are discussed in terms of complementary hemispheric roles for linguistic and prosodic analysis.

[1]  J. Cutting The Role of Right Hemisphere Dysfunction in Psychiatric Disorders , 1992, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[2]  L. Elias,et al.  Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  K. Heilman,et al.  Understanding emotional prosody activates right hemisphere regions. , 1996, Archives of neurology.

[4]  M. Bryden,et al.  Dichotic laterality effects obtained with emotional words. , 1988 .

[5]  K. Heilman,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in emotional communication. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  K Mori,et al.  Task‐dependent laterality for cue decoding during spoken language processing , 1998, Neuroreport.

[7]  M. Pell Recognition of prosody following unilateral brain lesion: influence of functional and structural attributes of prosodic contours , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Simultaneous verbal and affective laterality effects , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  E. Koff,et al.  The role of emotion in the linguistic and pragmatic aspects of aphasic performance , 1998, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[10]  D. Delis,et al.  Hemispheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  W. S. Brown,et al.  The relationship between auditory sensitivity and ear asymmetry on a dichotic listening task , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[13]  R. Masterton Role of the central auditory system in hearing: the new direction , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[14]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  The Integrated Mind , 1978, Springer US.

[15]  E Altenmüller,et al.  The cortical processing of perceived emotion: a DC‐potential study on affective speech prosody , 1997, Neuroreport.

[16]  H. Gardner,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials , 1981, Brain and Language.

[17]  A. Pegna,et al.  Hemispheric dominance for melody recognition in musicians and non-musicians , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  M. Annett A classification of hand preference by association analysis. , 1970, British journal of psychology.

[19]  J. Volkmann,et al.  Dichotic listening: What does it measure? , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  R. G. Ley,et al.  A dissociation of right and left hemispheric effects for recognizing emotional tone and verbal content , 1982, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  Robert B. Lufkin,et al.  Corpus callosum morphometry and dichotic listening performace: Individual differences in functional interhemispheric inhibition? , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Hemispheric specialization and the perception of emotion: Evidence from right-handers and from inverted and non-inverted left-handers , 1983, Neuropsychologia.