Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images.

OBJECTIVES Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of ideally positioned and systematically mispositioned dry skulls were measured using two-dimensional and three-dimensional software measurement techniques. Image measurements were compared with caliper measurements of the skulls. STUDY DESIGN Cone beam computed tomography volumes of 28 skulls in ideal, shifted, and rotated positions were assessed by measuring distances between anatomic points and reference wires by using panoramic reconstructions (two-dimensional) and direct measurements from axial slices (three-dimensional). Differences between caliper measurements on skulls and software measurements in images were assessed with paired t tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS Accuracy of measurement was not significantly affected by alterations in skull position or measurement of right or left sides. For easily visualized orthodontic wires, measurement accuracy was expressed by average errors less than 1.2% for two-dimensional measurement techniques and less than 0.6% for three-dimensional measurement techniques. Anatomic measurements were significantly more variable regardless of measurement technique. CONCLUSIONS Both two-dimensional and three-dimensional techniques provide acceptably accurate measurement of mandibular anatomy. Cone beam computed tomography measurement was not significantly influenced by variation in skull orientation during image acquisition.

[1]  P. Petocz,et al.  Accuracy of linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs taken at various positions in vitro. , 2002, European journal of orthodontics.

[2]  J Wolf,et al.  Effect of head positioning in panoramic radiography on vertical measurements: an in vitro study. , 1996, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[3]  J B Ludlow,et al.  Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy and prediction of asymmetry in panoramic radiographic images. , 2005, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[4]  S Hassfeld,et al.  Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. , 2005, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[5]  U Welander,et al.  Image Distortion in Rotational Panoramic Radiography , 1981, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.

[6]  T. Hansson,et al.  The orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. I. The factor of vertical magnification. , 1987, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[7]  A. Čelebić,et al.  Evaluation of the precision of dimensional measurements of the mandible on panoramic radiographs. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[8]  M W Vannier,et al.  Three-dimensional computed tomography landmark measurement in craniofacial surgical planning: experimental validation in vitro. , 1999, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[9]  M W Vannier,et al.  Quantitative analysis of spiral computed tomography for craniofacial clinical applications. , 1998, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[10]  Allan G Farman.  Panoramic radiographic images and the prediction of asymmetry. , 2006, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[11]  H. Wong,et al.  Quantitative measurement on three-dimensional computed tomography: an experimental validation using phantom objects. , 2000, Chang Gung medical journal.

[12]  M W Vannier,et al.  Craniofacial computed tomography scanning: technology, applications and future trends. , 2003, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[13]  A. Ekestubbe,et al.  Condylar height on panoramic radiographs. A methodologic study with a clinical application. , 1994, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[14]  K Maki,et al.  Computer-assisted simulations in orthodontic diagnosis and the application of a new cone beam X-ray computed tomography. , 2003, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[15]  P. Major,et al.  The effect of vertical and horizontal head positioning in panoramic radiography on mesiodistal tooth angulations. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[16]  W. Vach,et al.  Determining mandibular condyle and ramus height with the help of an Orthopantomogram--a valid method? , 1996, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[17]  C. Lascala,et al.  Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). , 2004, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[18]  T. Hansson,et al.  The Orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. II. The vertical symmetry. , 1988, Journal of oral rehabilitation.