Commercially Available Mobile Phone Headache Diary Apps: A Systematic Review

Background Headache diaries are often used by headache sufferers to self-monitor headaches. With advances in mobile technology, mobile electronic diary apps are becoming increasingly common. Objective This review aims to identify and evaluate all commercially available mobile headache diary apps for the two most popular mobile phone platforms, iOS and Android. Methods The authors developed a priori a set of 7 criteria that define an ideal headache diary app intended to help headache sufferers better understand and manage their headaches, while providing relevant data to health professionals. The app criteria were intended as minimum requirements for an acceptable headache diary app that could be prescribed by health care professionals. Each app was evaluated and scored against each criterion. Results Of the 38 apps identified, none of the apps met all 7 app criteria. The 3 highest scoring apps, meeting 5 of the app criteria, were iHeadache (developed by Better QOL), ecoHeadache (developed by ecoTouchMedia), and Headache Diary Pro (developed by Froggyware). Only 18% of the apps were created with scientific or clinical headache expertise and none of the apps reported on psychometric properties. Conclusions Despite the growing market and demand, there is a concerning lack of scientific expertise and evidence base associated with headache diary apps.

[1]  C. Eccleston,et al.  Smartphone applications for pain management , 2011, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[2]  Monique W. M. Jaspers,et al.  A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: Methodological aspects and empirical evidence , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[3]  Lisa Saiman,et al.  Cell phone intervention to improve adherence: Cystic fibrosis care team, patient, and parent perspectives , 2010, Pediatric pulmonology.

[4]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. , 2003, Controlled clinical trials.

[5]  Carolyn A. Watters,et al.  Bringing psychosocial support to headache sufferers using information and communication technology: lessons learned from asking potential users what they want. , 2014, Pain research & management.

[6]  Karthik Natarajan,et al.  Text4Health: impact of text message reminder-recalls for pediatric and adolescent immunizations. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[7]  A. Bastawrous,et al.  Mobile health use in low- and high-income countries: an overview of the peer-reviewed literature , 2013, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[8]  R. Lipton,et al.  The Global Burden of Headache: A Documentation of Headache Prevalence and Disability Worldwide , 2007, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[9]  Elizabeth Loder,et al.  The Prevalence, Impact, and Treatment of Migraine and Severe Headaches in the United States: A Review of Statistics From National Surveillance Studies , 2013, Headache.

[10]  Chris Kelleher,et al.  Overcoming Depression on the Internet (ODIN) (2): A Randomized Trial of a Self-Help Depression Skills Program With Reminders , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[12]  B. Rasmussen,et al.  Presentation of a New Instrument: The Diagnostic Headache Diary , 1992, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[13]  Paul P Stork,et al.  A randomized trial of electronic versus paper pain diaries in children: impact on compliance, accuracy, and acceptability , 2004, Pain.

[14]  Jennifer N Stinson,et al.  A qualitative review of the psychometric properties and feasibility of electronic headache diaries for children and adults: where we are and where we need to go. , 2013, Pain research & management.

[15]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[16]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability inspection methods , 1994, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[17]  R. Jamison,et al.  Electronic diaries for monitoring chronic pain: 1-year validation study , 2001, Pain.

[18]  J. Olesen,et al.  Diaries and Calendars for Migraine. A Review , 2006, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[19]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic Evaluation of Prototypes (individual) , 2022 .

[20]  M. Carter,et al.  Adherence to a Smartphone Application for Weight Loss Compared to Website and Paper Diary: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[21]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[22]  D. Cicchetti.  Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. , 1994 .

[23]  Andre Charland,et al.  Mobile application development , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[24]  AtlAs of headache disorders and resources in the world 2011 , 2011 .

[25]  Emily R Breton,et al.  Weight loss—there is an app for that! But does it adhere to evidence-informed practices? , 2011, Translational behavioral medicine.

[26]  J. T. Murchison,et al.  Radiology smartphone applications; current provision and cautions , 2013, Insights into Imaging.

[27]  Leslie Beth Herbert,et al.  A Comparison of Three Usability Evaluation Methods: Heuristic, Think-Aloud, and Performance Testing , 1993 .

[28]  M. Allena,et al.  An electronic diary on a palm device for headache monitoring: a preliminary experience , 2012, The Journal of Headache and Pain.