Assessing ecosystem services for informing land-use decisions: a problem-oriented approach

Assessments of ecosystem services (ES), that aim at informing decisions on land management, are increasing in number around the globe. Despite selected success stories, evidence for ES information being used in decision making is weak, partly because ES assessments are found to fall short in targeting information needs by decision makers. To improve their applicability in practice, we compared existing concepts of ES assessments with focus on informing land use decisions and identified opportunities for enhancing the relevance of ES assessments for decision making. In a process of codesign, building on experience of four projects in Brazil, China, Madagascar, and Vietnam, we developed a step-wise approach for better targeting ES assessments toward information needs in land use decisions. Our problem-oriented approach aims at (1) structuring ES information according to land use problems identified by stakeholders, (2) targeting context-specific ES information needs by decision makers, and (3) assessing relevant management options. We demonstrate how our approach contributes to making ES assessments more policy relevant and enhances the application of ES assessments as a tool for decision support.

[1]  J. Mustajoki,et al.  Participatory multi-criteria assessment as ‘opening up’ vs. ‘closing down’ of policy discourses: A case of old-growth forest conflict in Finnish Upper Lapland , 2013 .

[2]  M. Schaafsma,et al.  The ecosystem services valuation tool and its future developments , 2013 .

[3]  D. Abson,et al.  Valuing Ecosystem Services in Terms of Ecological Risks and Returns , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  José M. Paruelo,et al.  Ecosystem service evaluation to support land-use policy , 2012 .

[5]  J. Köppel,et al.  Paternalism or participatory governance? Efforts and obstacles in implementing the Brazilian water policy in a large watershed , 2015 .

[6]  D. Richardson,et al.  Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa , 2009 .

[7]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[8]  Carolyn G. Palmer,et al.  Fostering Complexity Thinking in Action Research for Change in Social-Ecological Systems , 2013 .

[9]  Joachim H. Spangenberg,et al.  The ecosystem service cascade: Further developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy , 2014 .

[10]  Darius J. Semmens,et al.  A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation , 2013 .

[11]  G. Daily,et al.  Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions , 2015 .

[12]  A.P.E. van Oudenhoven,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Ecosystem Services as a Contested Concept: A Synthesis of Critique and Counter-arguments Schötter, , 2014 .

[13]  Stephan Mäs,et al.  Land Management and Ecosystem Services How Collaborative Research Programmes Can Support Better Policies , 2012 .

[14]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Complex systems and valuation , 2002 .

[15]  K. Chan,et al.  Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values , 2012 .

[16]  F. Sijtsma,et al.  Beyond monetary measurement: How to evaluate projects and policies using the ecosystem services framework , 2013 .

[17]  P. Döll,et al.  Experiences with a Transdisciplinary Research Approach for Integrating Ecosystem Services into Water Management in Northwest China , 2014 .

[18]  Claire Waterton,et al.  Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to “living with” , 2013 .

[19]  E. Ostrom.  A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Y. Laurans,et al.  Use of ecosystem services economic valuation for decision making: questioning a literature blindspot. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  H. Saarikoski,et al.  Understanding ‘successful’ conflict resolution: Policy regime changes and new interactive arenas in the Great Bear Rainforest , 2013 .

[22]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. , 2014 .

[23]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Ü. Halik,et al.  Sustainable management of river oases along the Tarim River (SuMaRiO) in Northwest China under conditions of climate change , 2014 .

[25]  E. Ostrom.  A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems , 2009, Science.

[26]  R. Costanza,et al.  Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making , 2009 .

[27]  Robert J. Scholes,et al.  Program on ecosystem change and society : an international research strategy for integrated social-ecological systems , 2012 .

[28]  Pedro Martins da Silva,et al.  Indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem services: a synthesis across ecosystems and spatial scales , 2009 .

[29]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .

[30]  Dirk J. Roux,et al.  Can ecosystem services lead ecology on a transdisciplinary pathway? , 2010, Environmental Conservation.

[31]  Karen J. Esler,et al.  What drives the use of scientific evidence in decision making? The case of the South African Working for Water program , 2015 .

[32]  Erich Tasser,et al.  Comparing land-use alternatives: Using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis , 2013 .

[33]  Jordi Honey-Rosés,et al.  A demand driven research agenda for ecosystem services , 2013 .

[34]  K. Heong,et al.  Restoration of rice landscape biodiversity by farmers in Vietnam through education and motivation using media , 2014 .

[35]  Joachim H. Spangenberg,et al.  Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies , 2014 .

[36]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Analysis of current trends in climate parameters, river discharge and glaciers in the Aksu River basin (Central Asia) , 2015 .

[37]  R. Cowling,et al.  An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  I. Fazey,et al.  An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies , 2012 .

[39]  C. Dormann,et al.  A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead , 2011 .

[40]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  J. Spangenberg,et al.  Kulturlandschaftsforschung in Südostasien – das LEGATO-Projekt , 2013 .

[42]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver , 2009 .

[43]  G. Daily,et al.  Field evidence that ecosystem service projects support biodiversity and diversify options , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  K. L. Heong,et al.  Communication and Behavior Change in Rice Farmers' Pest Management: The Case of Using Mass Media In Vietnam , 1999 .

[45]  R. Doluschitz,et al.  Development of agricultural land and water use and its driving forces along the Aksu and Tarim River, P.R. China , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[46]  Louise Willemen,et al.  A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services , 2013 .

[47]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Connecting social networks with ecosystem services for watershed governance: a social-ecological network perspective highlights the critical role of bridging organizations. , 2012 .

[48]  E. Gómez‐Baggethun,et al.  Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: A review of the empirical evidence , 2015 .

[49]  B. Voigt,et al.  New perspectives in ecosystem services science as instruments to understand environmental securities , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  D. Garrick,et al.  Water markets and freshwater ecosystem services: Policy reform and implementation in the Columbia and Murray-Darling Basins , 2009 .

[51]  A. Davidson,et al.  A Methodology to Map Ecosystem Functions to Support Ecosystem Services Assessments , 2013 .

[52]  Rachelle K. Gould,et al.  Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement , 2012 .

[53]  Kent H. Redford,et al.  Do we need to develop a more relevant conservation literature? , 2010, Oryx.

[54]  Martin Beniston,et al.  Climate change impacts on glaciers and runoff in Tien Shan (Central Asia) , 2012 .

[55]  H. Joosten,et al.  Ecosystem services and ethics , 2013 .

[56]  Elizabeth A. Law,et al.  Making decisions for managing ecosystem services , 2015 .

[57]  Matthew Asa Cashmore,et al.  DECISION-ORIENTED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF ITS THEORY AND METHODS , 2006 .

[58]  Response to Turnhout et al.'s Rethinking Biodiversity: From Goods and Services to “Living With” , 2014 .