BACKGROUND
This review describes the programmatic features of entry-level master's programs in nursing in the United States that result in a generalist degree for individuals with a baccalaureate degree in another field. The number of entry-level Master of Science in Nursing programs has grown over the past decade, increasing the importance of understanding the features, similarities, and differences among these programs.
METHOD
Using a custom report of accredited schools of nursing with entry-level master's programs from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing and the Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing's website, we conducted a program review to describe the programs' features.
RESULTS
There is substantial variation in nomenclature, length, credits, and clinical hours among entry-level master's programs.
CONCLUSION
The difference in these programs may create confusion among potential students of the programs and employees of the graduates. Investigations are needed on the relationship between programmatic features and outcomes. [J Nurs Educ. 2019;58(9):525-529.].
[1]
Brent J. Evans,et al.
The Limitations of the GRE in Predicting Success in Biomedical Graduate School
,
2017,
PloS one.
[2]
M. Bender.
The current evidence base for the clinical nurse leader: a narrative review of the literature.
,
2014,
Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.
[3]
S. Motzer,et al.
The graduate record examination: help or hindrance in nursing graduate school admissions?
,
2009,
Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.
[4]
American Nurses' Association first position on education for nursing.
,
1965,
The American journal of nursing.