Libraries, Electronic Resources, and Privacy: The Case for Positive Intellectual Freedom

Public and research libraries have long provided resources in electronic formats, and the tension between providing electronic resources and patron privacy is widely recognized. But assessing trade-offs between privacy and access to electronic resources remains difficult. One reason is a conceptual problem regarding intellectual freedom. Traditionally, the LIS literature has plausibly understood privacy as a facet of intellectual freedom. However, while certain types of electronic resource use may diminish patron privacy, thereby diminishing intellectual freedom, the opportunities created by such resources also appear liberty enhancing. Adjudicating between privacy loss and enhanced opportunities on intellectual freedom grounds must therefore provide an account of intellectual freedom capable of addressing both privacy and opportunity. I will argue that intellectual freedom is a form of positive freedom, where a person’s freedom is a function of the quality of her agency. Using this view as the lodestar, I articulate several principles for assessing adoption of electronic resources and privacy protections.

[1]  Thomas E. Hill,et al.  Autonomy and benevolent lies , 1984 .

[2]  Gary D. Barber Intellectual freedom manual , 1993 .

[3]  Thomas E. HillJr. Autonomy and benevolent lies , 1984 .

[4]  Tom Storey,et al.  Sharing, Privacy and Trust in Our Networked World. A Report to the OCLC Membership. , 2007 .

[5]  J. Christman,et al.  Liberalism and Individual Positive Freedom , 1991, Ethics.

[6]  Lee S. Strickland,et al.  Technology, security, and individual privacy: New tools, new threats, and new public perceptions , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Martin Garnar,et al.  Intellectual freedom manual , 2015 .

[8]  Edward J. Bloustein,et al.  Privacy as an Aspect of Human Dignity : An Answer to Dean Prosser , 1984 .

[9]  I. Berlin,et al.  Four Essays on Liberty , 1969 .

[10]  Seana Valentine Shiffrin,et al.  Paternalism, Unconscionability Doctrine, and Accommodation , 2000 .

[11]  Karen G. Lawson,et al.  University undergraduate students and library-related privacy issues , 2005 .

[12]  E. Nelson Liberty: One or Two Concepts Liberty , 2005 .

[13]  Xiaohua Zhu,et al.  Social Construction of Authorized Users in the Digital Age , 2010, Coll. Res. Libr..

[14]  Marc Parry As Libraries Go Digital, Sharing of Data Is at Odds with Tradition of Privacy. , 2012 .

[15]  Alan Rubel,et al.  Democratic principles and mandatory labeling of genetically engineered food , 2004 .

[16]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Introduction , 2010, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[17]  Gerald C. Maccallum Negative and Positive Freedom , 1967 .

[18]  Julie E. Cohen A Right to Read Anonymously: A Closer Look at , 1997 .

[19]  안태경 Social Science Research Network , 2005 .

[20]  John Azzolini Licensing Digital Content: A Practical Guide for Librarians, 2nd ed. , 2010 .

[21]  Paul Sturges Licensing Digital Content: A Practical Guide for Librarians , 2003 .

[22]  S. Heyman Positive and Negative Liberty , 1992 .

[23]  J. W. DeCew,et al.  Uneasy Access: Privacy for Women in a Free Society , 1988 .

[24]  Samuel J. Best,et al.  Privacy in the Information Age , 2006 .

[25]  États-Unis Uniting and strengthening America by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism (USA patriot act) Act of 2001 , 2001 .

[26]  Mei Zhang,et al.  Four Facets of Privacy and Intellectual Freedom in Licensing Contracts for Electronic Journals , 2015, Coll. Res. Libr..

[27]  Gordon Graham,et al.  The Morality of Freedom. , 1987 .

[28]  Stacey L. Bowers Privacy and Library Records. , 2006 .

[29]  Alan Rubel,et al.  The Particularized Judgment Account of Privacy , 2010 .

[30]  Edward M. Corrado Privacy and Library 2.0: How Do They Conflict? , 2007 .

[31]  Janice M. Bogstad The Librarian’s Legal Companion for Licensing Information Resources and Services , 2014 .

[32]  J. Christman Saving Positive Freedom , 2005 .

[33]  P. Kleingeld,et al.  The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2013 .

[34]  Jennifer King,et al.  What Californians Understand about Privacy Online , 2008 .

[35]  J. Reiman,et al.  Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood , 1984 .

[36]  Trina J. Magi A Content Analysis of Library Vendor Privacy Policies: Do They Meet Our Standards? , 2010, Coll. Res. Libr..

[37]  J. W. DeCew In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics, and the Rise of Technology , 1997 .

[38]  Lee Rainie,et al.  The Rise of E-Reading. , 2012 .

[39]  Marc Jonathan Blitz Constitutional Safeguards for Silent Experiments in Living: Libraries, the Right to Read, and a First Amendment Theory for an Unaccompanied Right to Receive Information , 2006 .

[40]  Richard Bellamy,et al.  The morality of freedom , 1988 .

[41]  Eliza T. Dresang Intellectual Freedom and Libraries: Complexity and Change in the Twenty‐First‐Century Digital Environment1 , 2006, The Library Quarterly.

[42]  Trina J. Magi Fourteen Reasons Privacy Matters: A Multidisciplinary Review of Scholarly Literature1 , 2011, The Library Quarterly.

[43]  W. Koops,et al.  IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) , 1985 .

[44]  G. Cohen,et al.  On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy , 2011 .

[45]  G. Cohen Freedom and money , 2001 .