Slow Recovery of Excitability and the Wenckebach Phenomenon in the Single Guinea Pig Ventricular Myocyte

The cellular mechanisms of Wenckebach periodicity were investigated in single, enzymatically dissociated guinea pig ventricular myocytes, as well as in computer reconstructions of transmembrane potential of the ventricular cell. When depolarizing current pulses of the appropriate magnitude were delivered repetitively to a well-polarized myocyte, rate-dependent activation failure was observed. Such behavior accurately mimicked the Wenckebach phenomenon in cardiac activation and was the consequence of variations in cell excitability during the diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle. The recovery of cell excitability during diastole was studied through the application of single test pulses of fixed amplitude and duration at variable delays with respect to a basic train of normal action potentials. The results show that recovery of excitability is a slow process that can greatly outlast action potential duration (i.e., postrepolarization refractoriness). Two distinct types of subthresbold responses were recorded when activation failure occurred: one was tetrodotoxin- and cobalt-insensitive (type 1) and the other was sensitive to sodium-channel blockade (type 2). Type 1 responses, which were commonly associated with the typical structure of the Wenckebach phenomenon (Mobitz type 1 block), were found to be the result of the nonlinear conductance properties of the inward rectifier current, IK1. Type 2 sodium-channel-mediated responses were associated with the so-called "millisecond Wenckebach." These responses may be implicated in the mechanism of Mobitz type 2 rate-dependent Mock. Single-cell voltage-clamp experiments suggest that variations in excitability during diastole are a consequence of the slow deactivation kinetics of the delayed rectifier, IK. Computer simulations of the ventricular cell response to depolarizing current pulses reproduced very closely all the response patterns obtained in the experimental preparation. It is concluded that postrepolarization refractoriness and Wenckebach periodicity are properties of normal cardiac excitable cells and can be explained in terms of the voltage dependence and slow kinetics of potassium outward currents. The conditions for the occurrence of intermittent activation failure during diastole will depend on the frequency and magnitude of the driving stimulus.

[1]  L. Dreifus,et al.  Second degree atrioventricular block. , 1967, Cardiovascular research.

[2]  B. Bean Two kinds of calcium channels in canine atrial cells. Differences in kinetics, selectivity, and pharmacology , 1985, The Journal of general physiology.

[3]  C. Antzelevitch,et al.  Rate‐dependent Changes in Excitability of Depressed Cardiac Purkinje Fibers as a Mechanism of Intermittent Bundle Branch Block , 1983, Circulation.

[4]  B Sakmann,et al.  Conductance properties of single inwardly rectifying potassium channels in ventricular cells from guinea‐pig heart. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  R. Tsien,et al.  A novel type of cardiac calcium channel in ventricular cells , 1985, Nature.

[6]  J. Jalife The Sucrose Gap Preparation as a Model of AV Nodal Transmission: Are Dual Pathways Necessary for Reciprocation and AV Nodal “Echoes”? , 1983, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[7]  J. Wennemark,et al.  Microelectrode study of Wenckebach periodicity in canine Purkinje fibers. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  K. S. Lee,et al.  Reversal of current through calcium channels in dialysed single heart cells , 1982, Nature.

[9]  D. Noble,et al.  Reconstruction of the electrical activity of cardiac Purkinje fibres. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  G. W. Beeler,et al.  Reconstruction of the action potential of ventricular myocardial fibres , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  R. Tsien,et al.  Multiple effects of calcium antagonists on plateau currents in cardiac Purkinje fibers , 1975, The Journal of general physiology.

[12]  T Powell,et al.  Sodium current in single rat heart muscle cells. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  T. Hironaka,et al.  The resting membrane potential of frog sartorius muscle. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Influence of a change in stimulation rate on action potentials, currents and contractions in rat ventricular cells. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  D. Noble,et al.  The control of calcium current reactivation by catecholamines and acetylcholine in single guinea-pig ventricular myocytes , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[17]  J Jalife,et al.  Excitation, Conduction, and Reflection Impulses in Isolated Bovine and Canine Cardiac Purkinje Fibers , 1981, Circulation research.

[18]  T. Mcdonald,et al.  THE POTASSIUM CURRENT UNDERLYING DELAYED RECTIFICATION IN CAT VENTRICULAR MUSCLE , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  R A Nadeau,et al.  The nature of Wenckebach cycles. , 1969, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[20]  R. Lazzara,et al.  Pathophysiology of second degree atrioventricular block: a unified hypothesis. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  S Nattel,et al.  Prediction of complex atrioventricular conduction rhythms in humans with use of the atrioventricular nodal recovery curve. , 1987, Circulation.

[22]  Richard Langendorf,et al.  Interpretation of Complex Arrhythmias , 1979 .

[23]  J. Spear,et al.  Electrophysiologic studies on atrioventricular nodal Wenckebach cycles. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  C Antzelevitch,et al.  Characteristics of Reflection as a Mechanism of Reentrant Arrhythmias and Its Relationship to Parasystole , 1980, Circulation.

[25]  A. Rosenblueth Mechanism of the Wenckebach-Luciani cycles. , 1958, The American journal of physiology.

[26]  R. Langendorf,et al.  Atrioventricular Block, Type II (Mobitz)—Its Nature and Clinical Significance , 1968, Circulation.

[27]  P. Denes,et al.  The incidence of typical and atypical A-V Wenckebach periodicity. , 1975, American heart journal.

[28]  D. Zipes Second-degree atrioventricular block. , 1979, Circulation.

[29]  K. F. Wenckebach Zur Analyse des unregelmässigen Pulses , 1898 .

[30]  J. Jalife,et al.  Determinants of Postrepolarization Refractoriness in Depressed Mammalian Ventricular Muscle , 1984, Circulation research.

[31]  D. Zipes,et al.  Some Examples of Wenckebach Periodicity in Cardiac Tissues, with an Appraisal of Mechanisms , 1983 .

[32]  M. N. Levy,et al.  Role of Positive Feedback in the Atrioventricular Nodal Wenckebach Phenomenon , 1974, Circulation research.