A Probabilistic Model of Activity Recognition with Loose Clothing

—Human activity recognition has become an attrac- tive research area with the development of on-body wearable sensing technology. With comfortable electronic-textiles, sensors can be embedded into clothing so that it is possible to record human movement outside the laboratory for long periods. However, a long-standing issue is how to deal with motion artefacts introduced by movement of clothing with respect to the body. Surprisingly, recent empirical findings suggest that cloth-attached sensor can actually achieve higher accuracy of activity recognition than rigid-attached sensor, particularly when predicting from short time-windows. In this work, a probabilistic model is introduced in which this improved accuracy and resposiveness is explained by the increased statistical distance between movements recorded via fabric sensing. The predictions of the model are verified in simulated and real human motion capture experiments, where it is evident that this counterintuitive effect is closely captured.

[1]  D. Stricker,et al.  Towards Artefact Aware Human Motion Capture using Inertial Sensors Integrated into Loose Clothing , 2022, 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[2]  Jiacheng Mai,et al.  Human Activity Recognition of Exoskeleton Robot with Supervised Learning Techniques , 2021 .

[3]  D. Bochtis,et al.  Human Activity Recognition through Recurrent Neural Networks for Human–Robot Interaction in Agriculture , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[4]  Zonghua Zhang,et al.  Recent Progress in Sensing and Computing Techniques for Human Activity Recognition and Motion Analysis , 2020, Electronics.

[5]  Kai Yang,et al.  E-Textiles for Healthy Ageing , 2019, Sensors.

[6]  Prem Prakash Jayaraman,et al.  An Industrial IoT Solution for Evaluating Workers' Performance Via Activity Recognition , 2019, 2019 IEEE 39th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS).

[7]  Fan Wu,et al.  Embroidered Electrodes for Control of Affordable Myoelectric Prostheses , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[8]  Brendan Michael,et al.  Activity recognition with wearable sensors on loose clothing , 2017, PloS one.

[9]  Brendan Michael,et al.  Learning Predictive Movement Models From Fabric-Mounted Wearable Sensors , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  Matthew J. Howard,et al.  Eliminating motion artifacts from fabric-mounted wearable sensors , 2014, 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[11]  L. Castano,et al.  Smart fabric sensors and e-textile technologies: a review , 2014 .

[12]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[13]  Pekka Siirtola,et al.  Activity recognition using a wrist-worn inertial measurement unit: A case study for industrial assembly lines , 2009, 2009 17th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.

[14]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Action capture with accelerometers , 2008, SCA '08.

[15]  Kihong Shin,et al.  Fundamentals of Signal Processing for Sound and Vibration Engineers , 2008 .

[16]  R. Zamar,et al.  A multivariate Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of goodness of fit , 1997 .