Calling All Facebook Friends: Exploring Requests for Help on Facebook

Past research suggests Facebook use is linked to perceptions of social capital, a concept that taps into the resources people gain from interactions with their social network. In this study, we examine a sample of public Facebook status updates (N=20,000) for instances in which users request a response from their network. These attempts to mobilize resources offer insight into the mechanisms through which Facebook is used for social capital conversion. After identifying mobilization requests (N=856), we categorize them by cost (i.e., effort needed to satisfy the request) and type (e.g., opinion, information, social coordination) in order to describe the prevalence of these requests and the extent to which they require effort on the part of the potential responders. Finally, we examine characteristics of these users and the linguistic characteristics of status updates that contain mobilization requests.

[1]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Predicting tie strength with social media , 2009, CHI.

[2]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Taxonomy and Theory in Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 2012 .

[3]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q&a behavior , 2010, CHI.

[4]  Stephanie Tom Tong,et al.  Relational Maintenance and Computer-Mediated Communication: Understanding the role of new technologies , 2010 .

[5]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices , 2011, New Media Soc..

[6]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[7]  Reijo Savolainen.  Everyday life information seeking: Approaching information seeking in the context of “way of life” , 1995 .

[8]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  On and Off the 'Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[9]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Perceptions of facebook's value as an information source , 2012, CHI.

[10]  F. Maxwell Harper,et al.  Facts or friends?: distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social Q&A sites , 2009, CHI.

[11]  D. Boyd,et al.  Sociality Through Social Network Sites , 2013 .

[12]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Social networks and Internet connectivity effects , 2005 .

[13]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  ‘There’s a network out there you might as well tap’: Exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook , 2013, New Media Soc..

[14]  P. Resnick.  Beyond Bowling Together: SocioTechnical Capital , 2001 .

[15]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  A Comparison of Information Seeking Using Search Engines and Social Networks , 2010, ICWSM.

[16]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams , 2010, CSCW '10.

[17]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Is Twitter a Good Place for Asking Questions? A Characterization Study , 2011, ICWSM.

[18]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[19]  David R. Karger,et al.  Tie strength in question & answer on social network sites , 2012, CSCW '12.

[20]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[21]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2007) , 2007 .

[23]  Monika Zalnieriute,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies , 2013, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[24]  John Boyd-Carpenter,et al.  Way of life , 1980 .

[25]  Cindy K. Chung,et al.  The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007 , 2007 .

[26]  Wong Fei Mun.  Social Network Sites , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[27]  Stephen Lacy,et al.  Analyzing Media Messages , 2019 .

[28]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Who wants to know?: question-asking and answering practices among facebook users , 2013, CSCW '13.

[29]  John Nerbonne,et al.  The Secret Life of Pronouns. What Our Words Say About Us , 2014, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[30]  Robert G. Capra,et al.  Factors mediating disclosure in social network sites , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Catherine A. Johnson.  Choosing people: the role of social capital in information seeking behaviour , 2004, Inf. Res..

[32]  J. Richardson.  Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education , 1986 .

[33]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Factors Affecting Response Quantity, Quality, and Speed for Questions Asked Via Social Network Status Messages , 2011, ICWSM.

[34]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Cultivating Social Resources on Social Network Sites: Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Their Role in Social Capital Processes , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[35]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Social capital on facebook: differentiating uses and users , 2011, CHI.

[36]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Favors from facebook friends: unpacking dimensions of social capital , 2013, CHI.

[37]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Privacy in Interaction: Exploring Disclosure and Social Capital in Facebook , 2012, ICWSM.

[38]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Culture Matters: A Survey Study of Social Q&A Behavior , 2011, ICWSM.

[40]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[41]  W. Dutton.  The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies , 2013 .

[42]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing , 2006, CSCW '06.

[43]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Social network activity and social well-being , 2010, CHI.