Importance of the Pharmacological Profile of the Bound Ligand in Enrichment on Nuclear Receptors: Toward the Use of Experimentally Validated Decoy Ligands
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Irwin,et al. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[2] D. Rognan,et al. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[3] Michael M. Mysinger,et al. Directory of Useful Decoys, Enhanced (DUD-E): Better Ligands and Decoys for Better Benchmarking , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[4] Simona Distinto,et al. Evaluation of the performance of 3D virtual screening protocols: RMSD comparisons, enrichment assessments, and decoy selection—What can we learn from earlier mistakes? , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[5] P. Fischer,et al. Protein structures in virtual screening: a case study with CDK2. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[6] Thomas Lengauer,et al. ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R , 2005, Bioinform..
[7] F. Wilcoxon. Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .
[8] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. Ligand and Decoy Sets for Docking to G Protein-Coupled Receptors , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[9] Matthieu Montes,et al. NRLiSt BDB, the manually curated nuclear receptors ligands and structures benchmarking database. , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[10] J.. Virtual screening : a real screening complement to high-throughput screening , 2009 .
[11] John W. Liebeschuetz,et al. Evaluating docking programs: keeping the playing field level , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[12] B. Shoichet,et al. Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[13] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Integrating virtual screening in lead discovery. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[14] Matthieu Montes,et al. Multiple Structures for Virtual Ligand Screening: Defining Binding Site Properties-Based Criteria to Optimize the Selection of the Query , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[15] Maria A Miteva,et al. Structure‐based virtual ligand screening with LigandFit: Pose prediction and enrichment of compound collections , 2007, Proteins.
[16] Maria A Miteva,et al. Fast structure-based virtual ligand screening combining FRED, DOCK, and Surflex. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[17] Ajay N. Jain,et al. Parameter estimation for scoring protein-ligand interactions using negative training data. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[18] Ajay N. Jain. Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[19] H. Gronemeyer,et al. Nuclear receptor ligand-binding domains: three-dimensional structures, molecular interactions and pharmacological implications. , 2000, Trends in pharmacological sciences.