Elastic moduli of collagen gels can be predicted from two-dimensional confocal microscopy.

We quantitatively compare data obtained from imaging two-dimensional slices of three-dimensional unlabeled and fluorescently labeled collagen gels with confocal reflectance microscopy (CRM) and/or confocal fluorescence microscopy (CFM). Different network structures are obtained by assembling the gels over a range of concentrations at various temperatures. Comparison between CRM and CFM shows that the techniques are not equally sensitive to details of network structure, with CFM displaying higher fidelity in imaging fibers parallel to the optical axis. Comparison of CRM of plain and labeled collagen gels shows that labeling itself induces changes in gel structure, chiefly through inhibition of fibril bundling. Despite these differences, image analyses carried out on two-dimensional CFM and CRM slices of collagen gels reveal identical trends in structural parameters as a function of collagen concentration and gelation temperature. Fibril diameter approximated from either CRM or CFM is in good accord with that determined via electron microscopy. Two-dimensional CRM images are used to show that semiflexible polymer theory can relate network structural properties to elastic modulus successfully. For networks containing bundled fibrils, it is shown that average structural diameter, rather than fibril diameter, is the length scale that sets the magnitude of the gel elastic modulus.

[1]  C. Vater,et al.  Native cross-links in collagen fibrils induce resistance to human synovial collagenase. , 1979, The Biochemical journal.

[2]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Statistical mechanics of semiflexible bundles of wormlike polymer chains. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[3]  D. Weitz,et al.  Elastic Behavior of Cross-Linked and Bundled Actin Networks , 2004, Science.

[4]  W. M. S T E I N,et al.  An algorithm for extracting the network geometry of three-dimensional collagen gels , 2007 .

[5]  M. Raspanti,et al.  Collagen fibril structure is affected by collagen concentration and decorin. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[6]  F H Silver,et al.  Assembly of type I collagen: fusion of fibril subunits and the influence of fibril diameter on mechanical properties. , 2000, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[7]  W. Comper,et al.  The mechanism of nucleation for in vitro collagen fibril formation , 1977, Biopolymers.

[8]  D A Weitz,et al.  Glioma expansion in collagen I matrices: analyzing collagen concentration-dependent growth and motility patterns. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[9]  R M Nerem,et al.  Vascular tissue engineering. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[10]  P. Onck,et al.  Three-dimensional cross-linked F-actin networks: relation between network architecture and mechanical behavior. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[11]  Klod Kokini,et al.  Fibril microstructure affects strain transmission within collagen extracellular matrices. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  P. Janmey,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels , 2004, Nature.

[13]  Steven C George,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of collagen gel microstructure and mechanics using multiphoton microscopy. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[14]  E. Turley,et al.  The retention and ultrastructural appearances of various extracellular matrix molecules incorporated into three-dimensional hydrated collagen lattices. , 1985, Developmental biology.

[15]  Won Ho Park,et al.  Electrospinning of collagen nanofibers: effects on the behavior of normal human keratinocytes and early-stage wound healing. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[16]  P. Janmey,et al.  Elasticity of semiflexible biopolymer networks. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[17]  G. C. Wood,et al.  The formation of fibrils from collagen solutions. 1. The effect of experimental conditions: kinetic and electron-microscope studies. , 1960, The Biochemical journal.

[18]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Robust pore size analysis of filamentous networks from three-dimensional confocal microscopy. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[19]  J. Davies,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell , 1983, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal.

[21]  Mechanics of bundled semiflexible polymer networks. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[22]  Watt W Webb,et al.  Interpreting second-harmonic generation images of collagen I fibrils. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[23]  J. A. Chapman,et al.  Collagen fibril formation. , 1996, The Biochemical journal.

[24]  P. Friedl.  Dynamic imaging of cellular interactions with extracellular matrix , 2004, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[25]  David G Simpson,et al.  Electrospinning of collagen nanofibers. , 2002, Biomacromolecules.

[26]  M. Stack,et al.  Multi-step pericellular proteolysis controls the transition from individual to collective cancer cell invasion , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[27]  K. Piez,et al.  Collagen fibril formation. Optimal in vitro conditions and preliminary kinetic results. , 1978, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  B. Tromberg,et al.  Imaging cells and extracellular matrix in vivo by using second-harmonic generation and two-photon excited fluorescence , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  David C. Morse,et al.  Viscoelasticity of concentrated isotropic solutions of semiflexible polymers. 2. Linear response , 1998 .

[30]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Rheology and confocal reflectance microscopy as probes of mechanical properties and structure during collagen and collagen/hyaluronan self-assembly. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[31]  J. Paul Robinson,et al.  Tensile mechanical properties of three-dimensional type I collagen extracellular matrices with varied microstructure. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[32]  Enrico Gratton,et al.  Image correlation spectroscopy of multiphoton images correlates with collagen mechanical properties. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[33]  P. Friedl,et al.  The biology of cell locomotion within three-dimensional extracellular matrix , 2000, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[34]  David C. Morse,et al.  Viscoelasticity of Concentrated Isotropic Solutions of Semiflexible Polymers. 1. Model and Stress Tensor , 1998 .

[35]  T van Dillen,et al.  Alternative explanation of stiffening in cross-linked semiflexible networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[36]  G. C. Wood.  The formation of fibrils from collagen solutions. 2. A mechanism of collagen-fibril formation. , 1960, The Biochemical journal.

[37]  J. Mayo Greenberg,et al.  Electromagnetic Scattering by Obliquely Oriented Cylinders , 1966 .

[38]  Vinod Subramaniam,et al.  Micromechanical bending of single collagen fibrils using atomic force microscopy. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[39]  L. Sander,et al.  An algorithm for extracting the network geometry of three‐dimensional collagen gels , 2008, Journal of microscopy.

[40]  Ronald G. Driggers,et al.  Encyclopedia of optical engineering , 2003 .

[41]  Jan Feijen,et al.  Mechanical properties of native and cross-linked type I collagen fibrils. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[42]  David A. Weitz,et al.  The micromechanics of three-dimensional collagen-I gels , 2008, Complex..

[43]  I. S. Saidi,et al.  Mie and Rayleigh modeling of visible-light scattering in neonatal skin. , 1995, Applied optics.