The Pennsylvania Postmarket Multicenter Experience With Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device

BACKGROUND: The flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) is a novel self-expanding double-layer nitinol braided flow diverter that recently received FDA approval. However, early postmarket studies from the United States are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To report our short-term multicenter experience. METHODS: Series of consecutive patients undergoing FRED treatment for intracranial aneurysms were queried from prospectively maintained registries at 4 North-American Centers in Pennsylvania (February 2020-June 2021). The pertinent baseline demographics, aneurysmal characteristics, and procedural outcomes were collected and analyzed, with primary outcome of aneurysmal occlusion and secondary outcome of safety and complications. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (median age 58 years, 82% female) underwent 65 FRED treatment procedures for 72 aneurysms. Most (86.1%) of the aneurysms were unruptured; 80.5% were saccular in morphology, and 87.5% were located along the internal carotid artery, with a median size of 7.1 mm (IQR 5.2-11.9 mm). Radiographic follow-up was available in 86.1% of the aneurysms, showing complete occlusion in 74.2% (80% in catheter angiography-only group), and near-complete occlusion in 11.3% of the cases (median 6.3 months), with 2.8% re-treated. Permanent ischemic complications were encountered in 2.8% of the cases, with no procedural mortality. A modified Rankin Scale of 0 to 2 was documented in 98.1% of the patients at the last clinical follow-up (median 6.1 months). CONCLUSION: The results of the early postmarket experience with the FRED device show reasonable safety and adequate aneurysmal occlusion rates comparable with other flow diverters. However, more extensive multicenter studies with more extended follow-up data are needed to assess the long-term safety and durability of the device.

[1]  S. Hetts,et al.  Safety and efficacy results of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) stent system in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: US pivotal trial , 2021, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[2]  A. Siddiqui,et al.  Flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review , 2021, Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences.

[3]  E. Boccardi,et al.  FRED Italian Registry: a multicenter experience with the flow re-direction endoluminal device for intracranial aneurysms. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  C. Ogilvy,et al.  Predictive factors of incomplete aneurysm occlusion after endovascular treatment with the Pipeline embolization device. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  A. Doerfler,et al.  Two- to five-year follow-up of 78 patients after treatment with the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device , 2020, Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences.

[6]  N. Herial,et al.  Predictors of Complications, Functional Outcome, and Morbidity in a Large Cohort Treated With Flow Diversion. , 2019, Neurosurgery.

[7]  N. Sourour,et al.  Flow Diverters for Intracranial Aneurysms: The DIVERSION National Prospective Cohort Study. , 2019, Stroke.

[8]  C. Bettegowda,et al.  Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device: the PREMIER study 1 year results , 2019, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[9]  Justin M. Moore,et al.  The Pipeline Embolization Device: Changes in Practice and Reduction of Complications in the Treatment of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms in a Multicenter Cohort. , 2019, Neurosurgery.

[10]  J. Gauvrit,et al.  SAFE study (Safety and efficacy Analysis of FRED Embolic device in aneurysm treatment): 1-year clinical and anatomical results , 2018, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[11]  S. Tjoumakaris,et al.  Aneurysms with persistent filling after failed treatment with the Pipeline embolization device. , 2018, Journal of neurosurgery.

[12]  R. Tamargo,et al.  Predictors of cerebral aneurysm persistence and occlusion after flow diversion: a single-institution series of 445 cases with angiographic follow-up. , 2018, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  M. Augustin,et al.  European Multicenter Study for the Evaluation of a Dual-Layer Flow-Diverting Stent for Treatment of Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms: The European Flow-Redirection Intraluminal Device Study , 2018, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[14]  C. Ogilvy,et al.  Predictors of Incomplete Occlusion following Pipeline Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: Is It Less Effective in Older Patients? , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[15]  N. Kocer,et al.  Is there an association between flow diverter fish mouthing and delayed-type hypersensitivity to metals?—a case-control study , 2017, Neuroradiology.

[16]  H. Woo,et al.  Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: 3-year follow-up results. , 2017, Journal of neurosurgery.

[17]  H. Woo,et al.  Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes Following Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Complex Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Five-Year Results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial , 2017, Neurosurgery.

[18]  N. Kocer,et al.  Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device in treatment of cerebral aneurysms: initial experience with short-term follow-up results. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery.

[19]  Adnan H Siddiqui,et al.  Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. , 2013, Radiology.

[20]  C. O’Kelly,et al.  Canadian Experience with the Pipeline Embolization Device for Repair of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[21]  David F. Kallmes,et al.  Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms With Flow Diverters: A Meta-Analysis , 2013, Stroke.

[22]  J. Swieten Interobserver Agreement for the Assessment of Handicap in Stroke Patients , 2005 .

[23]  Daniel Roy,et al.  Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Aneurysms , 2001, Stroke.

[24]  H. Schouten,et al.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. , 1988, Stroke.