Feasibility of tomography with unknown view angles

In the standard two-dimensional (2-D) parallel beam tomographic formulation, it is generally assumed that the angles at which the projections were acquired are known. We have previously demonstrated, however, that under fairly mild conditions these view angles can be uniquely recovered from the projections themselves. We address the question of reliability of such solutions to the angle recovery problem using moments of the projections. We demonstrate that under mild conditions, the angle recovery problem has unique solutions and is stable with respect to perturbations in the data. Furthermore, we determine the Cramer-Rao lower bounds on the variance of the estimates of the angles when the projection are corrupted by additive Gaussian noise. We also treat the case in which each projection is shifted by some unknown amount which must be jointly estimated with the view angles. Motivated by the stability results and relatively small values of the error bounds, we construct a simple algorithm to approximate the ML estimator and demonstrate that the problem can be feasibly solved in the presence of noise. Simulations using this simple estimator on a variety of phantoms show excellent performance at low to moderate noise levels, essentially achieving the Cramer-Rao bounds.

[1]  J. Felmlee,et al.  Adaptive technique for high-definition MR imaging of moving structures. , 1989, Radiology.

[2]  S. Deans The Radon Transform and Some of Its Applications , 1983 .

[3]  M. L. Wood,et al.  Planar‐motion correction with use of k‐space data acquired in fourier MR imaging , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Jacob Ziv,et al.  On the threshold effect in radar range estimation (Corresp.) , 1969, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  The stability of nonlinear least squares problems and the Cramer-Rao bound , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[6]  R. Ash,et al.  Real analysis and probability , 1975 .

[7]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[8]  F. Natterer The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography , 1986 .

[9]  Todd S. Sachs,et al.  The diminishing variance algorithm for real‐time reduction of motion artifacts in MRI , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  Uniqueness of tomography with unknown view angles , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[11]  A. B. Goncharov Methods of integral geometry and recovering a function with compact support from its projections in unknown directions , 1988 .

[12]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .

[13]  David B. Salzman,et al.  A Method of General Moments for Orienting 2D Projections of Unknown 3D Objects , 1990, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[14]  H Yan,et al.  Motion artifact suppression: a review of post-processing techniques. , 1992, Magnetic resonance imaging.